Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 162–180
UDC: 
373.1

Relationships between using modern ICT educational resources and schoolchildren’s academic performance

Chernyshova N. A. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation), Romanova O. A. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation)
1 National Research University Higher School Of Economics
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article investigates the contradictory problem of creating a cognitive educational environment within the context of preventing schoolchildren from using modern information technologies in the classroom in Russian schools. The purpose of the article is to analyze the relationships between the use of ICT resources by schoolchildren and their academic achievements.
Materials and Methods. The study used both qualitative and quantitative methods. Based on Russian data from the international comparative study PISA 2015 (n = 6036) and 2018 (n = 7608) factorial and regression analysis was carried out. Qualitative analysis was conducted on the basis of data collected via interviews with teachers in focus groups (n = 91) at 10 schools in Moscow (the Russian Federation).
Results. The data obtained from the interviews with teachers in Moscow schools reveal their negative attitude to the use of electronic devices by school students. The teachers believe that it deteriorates students’ cognitive and metacognitive skills. The factor analysis of the students’ survey data made it possible to distinguish two groups of variables: (1) the use of ICT resources for educational purposes; (2) the game format of their use. Regression analysis showed that the game format of using ICT resources does not worsen the academic performance. Moreover, frequent usage of ICT recourses for educational purposes significantly correlates with high academic achievements.
Conclusions. It is concluded that the use of ICT resources as a game tool does not lead to a deterioration in academic performance. At the same time, the frequent use of electronic resources for educational purposes can be an important step towards reducing the risks of academic failure and can contribute to increasing students’ academic achievements.

Keywords: 

Modern educational environment; IT-technologies; IT-resources; Use of electronic devices in schools; Learning outcomes; Academic achievements; Socio-economic status of the family.

Prominence Percentile SciVal: 

For citation:
Chernyshova N. A., Romanova O. A. Relationships between using modern ICT educational resources and schoolchildren’s academic performance. Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 162–180. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2006.09
References: 
  1. Ali M., Zhou L., Miller L., Ieromonachou P. User resistance in IT: A literature review. International Journal of Information Management, 2016, vol. 36 (1), pp. 35–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.09.007
  2. Anand V. A study of time management: The correlation between video game usage and academic performance markers. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2007, vol. 10 (4), pp. 552–559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9991
  3. Anshari M., Almunawar M. N., Shahrill M., Wicaksono D. K., Huda M. Smartphones usage in the classrooms: Learning aid or interference? Education and Information technologies, 2017, vol.  22  (6), pp. 3063–3079. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9572-7
  4. Brown J. P. Complexities of digital technology use and the teaching and learning of function. Computers & Education, 2015, vol. 87, pp. 112–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.022
  5. Chen C. H., Hwang G. J., Yang T. C., Chen C. H. Analysis of a ubiquitous performance support system for teachers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2009, vol. 46 (4), pp.  421–433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290903301727
  6. Chu H. C., Hwang G. J., Tsai C. C., Tseng J. C. R. A two-tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning systems for natural science courses. Computers & Education, 2010, vol.  55  (4), pp. 1618–1627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.004
  7. Chu H. C., Hwang G. J., Tsai C. C. A knowledge engineering approach to developing mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning. Computers & Education, 2010, vol. 54 (1), pp. 289–297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.023
  8. Fryer L. K., Bovee H. N. Supporting students' motivation for e-learning: Teachers matter on and offline. The Internet and Higher Education, 2016, vol. 30, pp. 21–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.03.003
  9. Gao Q., Yand Z., Weia Ch., Lianga Y., Mo L. Three different roles, five different aspects: Differences and similarities in viewing school mobile phone policies among teachers, parents, and students. Computers & Education, 2017, vol. 106, pp. 13–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.007
  10. Helsper E. J., Eynon R. Distinct skill pathways to digital engagement. European Journal of Communication, 2013, vol. 28 (6), pp. 696–713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113499113
  11. Hu C. Students, computers and learning: Where is the connection? Education and Information Technologies, 2017, vol. 22 (6), pp. 2665–2670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9670-6
  12. Hu X., Gong Y., Lai C., Leung F. K. S. The relationship between ICT and student literacy in mathematics, reading, and science across 44 countries: A multilevel analysis. Computers & Education, 2018, vol. 125, pp. 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.021
  13. Huizenga J., Admiraal W., Ten Dam G., Voogt J. Mobile game-based learning in secondary education: Students’ immersion, game activities, team performance and learning outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 2019, vol. 99, pp. 137–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.020
  14. Ip B., Jacobs G., Watkins A. Gaming frequency and academic performance. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2008, vol. 24 (4), pp. 355–373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1197
  15. Kashada A., Li H., Koshadah O. Analysis Approach to Identify Factors Influencing Digital Learning Technology Adoption and Utilization in Developing Countries. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 2018, vol. 13 (02), pp. 48–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i02.7399
  16. Kocdar S. Designing Teaching and Learning for a Digital Age. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2017, vol. 18 (3), pp. 159–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.3107
  17. Leem J., Sung E. Teachers' beliefs and technology acceptance concerning smart mobile devices for SMART education in South Korea. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2019, vol. 50 (2), pp. 601–613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12612
  18. Lumbay C., Larisma C. C. M., Centillas Jr. C.L. Computer Gamers Academic Performance in a Technological State College in Leyte, Philippines. Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJ-JSS), 2017, vol. 6 (2S), pp. 41–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25255/jss.2017.6.2S.41.49
  19. Paige J. B., Daley B. J. Situated cognition: A learning framework to support and guide high-fidelity simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 2009, vol. 5 (3), pp. e97–e103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2009.03.120
  20. Redfern J., Santo K., Coorey G., Thakkar J., Hackett M., Thiagalingam A., Chow C.K. Factors influencing engagement, perceived usefulness and behavioral mechanisms associated with a text message support program. PloS One, 2016, vol. 11 (10), pp. e0163929. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163929
  21. Sahin M., Gumus Y. Y., Dincel S. Game addiction and academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 2016, vol. 36 (9), pp. 1533–1543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.972342
  22. Shoufan A. Estimating the cognitive value of YouTube's educational videos: A learning analytics approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 2019, vol. 92, pp. 450–458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.036
  23. Siddiq F., Gochyyev P., Wilson M. Learning in Digital Networks–ICT literacy: A novel assessment of students' 21st century skills. Computers & Education, 2017, vol. 109, pp. 11–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.014
  24. Srijamdee K., Pholphirul P. Does ICT familiarity always help promote educational outcomes? Empirical evidence from PISA-Thailand. Education and Information Technologies, 2020, vol.  25  (4), pp. 2933–2970. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10089-z
  25. Tarus J. K., Gichoya D., Muumbo A. Challenges of implementing e-learning in Kenya: A case of Kenyan public universities. The International review of research in open and Distributed Learning, 2015, vol. 16 (1), pp. 120–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i1.1816
  26. Gubanova A. Y. Media content for children as a part of the educational process. Media Education Journal, 2017, no. 2, pp. 152–169. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29371739
  27. Potemkin A. S. ICT (Information and Communication Teсhnology) in the educational practice of schools. Innovations in Lifelong Learning. 2013, no. 6–7, pp. 43–50. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21032741
  28. Chernyshova N. A. Self-regulated learning strategies and lifelong learning skills: ideas developed in American scientists’ theories. Pedagogy, 2019, no. 1, pp. 56–64. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36983056
Date of the publication 31.12.2020