Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 73–90
UDC: 
101+316+378

Virtualization of social communication in education: Values-based approach to information development (a critical review)

Pushkarev Y. V. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation), Pushkareva E. A. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
1 Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article focuses on personality formation in the information society. The purpose of the study is to identify and clarify the core values within virtualization processes of social communication in education.
Materials and Methods. Adopting philosophical methodology, the authors employed the following research methods: general research theoretical methods, systemic analysis, comparison and generalization of international and Russian studies on the issues of personality formation in the information society. The study is based on the main approaches to understanding social information.
Results. The authors identify the main approaches to the content of social information in communication processes. It is emphasized that modern communication as a social phenomenon is determined by value orientations of a modern person.
The authors identify the characteristic features of scholarly communication in the situation of information saturation, which is associated with active computerization and mathematization of the Humanities; increasing the role of computer modeling in scientific research; increasing the intelligence of automated systems; including researchers in the world information computer network of databases and knowledge.
The study reveals that virtualization of education as a communication mediated by computer technologies within the framework of modern education is considered as the main factor influencing the value orientations of the individual (primarily the values of education). However, it is the virtualization of education that determines a wide range of problems in the development of online education (e-learning) and emerging value contradictions.
Conclusions. In conclusion, the article summarizes the core values of social communication virtualization processes in education.

Keywords: 

Phenomenon of social information; Development of information society; Values of information development; Formation of personality; Virtualization of education; Information in education; Influence of information; Acquisition of information.

Prominence Percentile SciVal: 98.749 Technology Integration | Pre-service Teachers | IPAD

http://apps.webofknowledge.com/full_record.do?product=RSCI&search_mode=G...

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85085869402&origin=...

Virtualization of social communication in education: Values-based approach to information development (a critical review)

For citation:
Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. Virtualization of social communication in education: Values-based approach to information development (a critical review). Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 73–90. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2002.05
References: 
  1. Hill V., Knutzen K. B. Virtual world global collaboration: An educational quest. Information and Learning Science, 2017, vol. 118 (9/10), pp. 547–565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-02-2017-0010
  2. Leidner D. E. Globalization, culture, and information: Towards global knowledge transparency.  Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2010, vol. 19 (2), pp. 69–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2010.02.006
  3. Liew A. Enhancing and enabling management control systems through information technology: The essential roles of internal transparency and global transparency. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 2019, vol. 33, pp. 16-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2019.03.001
  4. Nunkoo R., Ribeiro M. A., Sunnassee V., Gursoy D. Public trust in mega event planning institutions: The role of knowledge, transparency and corruption. Tourism Management, 2018, vol.  66, pp. 155-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.11.010
  5. Šmajs J. The philosophical conception of a constitution for the Earth. Human Affairs, 2015, vol.  25  (3), pp. 342–361. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2015-0028 
  6. Scanlon E. Technology enhanced learning in science: Interactions, affordances and design based research. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2010, no. 2, Art. 8. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/2010-8
  7. Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. Reflexive principles of personal development in the changing information content. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9 (2), pp. 52–66. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1902.04 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38191464
  8. Iudalevich N. V. Information garbage as phenomenon of modern society. Business Education in the Knowledge Economy, 2016, no. 2, pp. 119–122. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26128191
  9. Su C. The effects of students' learning anxiety and motivation on the learning achievement in the activity theory based gamified learning environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2017, vol. 13 (5), pp. 1229–1258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00669a
  10. Antonova Yu. V. Genesis of information culture phenomenon. Human Capital, 2019, no. 1, pp. 9–19. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36709878 
  11. Anikina N. V., Ivanova I. A., Gordina S. V. Information culture of a personality as an integral indicator of a person’s development in the system of a life-long education. Integration of Education, 2012, no. 4, pp. 108–113. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18353928 
  12. Vasenina E. A., Petuchova M. V., Soboleva E. V. Organization of cognitive activity of students in the study of computer science in the conditions of informatively-educational environment. Journal of Pedagogical Innovations, 2018, no. 1, pp. 115–126. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32695144
  13. Ashilova M. S., Begalinov A. S., Begalinova K. K. About the impact of digitalization of society on education in Kazakhstan. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9 (6), pp. 40–51. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1906.03 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41586632
  14. Trofimov V. M. The topology of human reflection: Comparison with finite automata. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9 (5), pp. 110–124. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1905.07 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41271743
  15. Verbitskaya N. O., Do B., Mazurkova A. A. Values transformations in the processes of continuing education in the conditions of digital civilization. Bulletin of South Ural state University. Series: Education. Pedagogical Science, 2018, vol. 10 (2), pp. 44–50. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35003394 
  16. Pushkareva E. A. Value foundations of interaction between modern education and science. Monograph. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Publ., 2014, 172 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24960640
  17. Shub M. L. Social, collective, and cultural memory: A new approach to the definition of the semantic borders of concepts. Observatory of Culture, 2017, vol. 14 (1), pp. 4–11. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29037229 
  18. Pushkareva E. A. Philosophical analysis of the integration of education and science. Monograph. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Publ., 2014, 172 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24174773
  19. Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. The phenomenon of social information in education: Modern research practices (a critical review). Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9 (6), pp. 52–71. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1906.04
  20. Kazanova N. V., Khlipun V. V.Understanding the phenomenon of information in the works of founders of informatics: a view through half a century. Proceedings of Volgograd State Technical University. Series: Problems of Social and Humanitarian Knowledge, 2015, vol. 24 (10), pp. 26–29. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25112746
  21. Demina M. G. The concept of “knowledge society” in reality of the second-order observers. Values and Meanings, 2018, no. 3, pp. 117–129. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35303101
  22. Sanakuev N. G. Procedural and pragmatist character of communication. Bulletin of Volgograd State University. Series 7: Philosophy. Sociology and Social Technologies, 2015, no. 2, pp. 133–142. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24212945
  23. Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. Communication foundation for intellectual culture: Tendencies of contemporary development. XLinguae, 2019, vol. 12 (4), pp. 212–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2019.12.04.18
  24. Trufanova E. O. Information oversaturation: Key problems. Philosophical Problems of Information Technologies and Cyberspace, 2019, no. 1, pp. 4–21. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17726/philIT.2019.1.16.1  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41213222 
  25. Pushkarev Yu. V., Pushkareva E. A. Philosophical interpretation of knowledge and information: Knowledge value and information diversity in modern communication. XLinguae, 2018, vol.  11  (3), pp. 176–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2018.11.03.17 
  26. Protchenko A. N. Education in informatization of society. Integration of Education, 2014, no. 3, pp. 77–82. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/inted.076.018.201403 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22297401
  27. Pushkareva E. A., Latuha O. A. Integration of science and education: Problems of implementation in an educational institution. Monograph. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Publ., 2014. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24211080
  28. Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. Knowledge paradigm in social development: Basic concepts. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2015, vol. 5 (3), pp. 55–62. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1503.05 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23565664
  29. Yonezawa A., Horta H., Osawa A. Mobility, formation and development of the academic profession in science, technology, engineering and mathematics in East and South East Asia. Comparative Education, 2016, vol. 52 (1), pp. 44–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2015.1125617 
  30. Chai Ch. S., Koh E., Lim Ch. P., Tsai Ch.-Ch. Deepening ICT integration through multilevel design of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Computers in Education, 2014, vol.  1  (1), pp. 1–17. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-014-0002-1
  31. Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. Fundamental knowledge in the continuing education: Methodology and axiology of the problem. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2016, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 87–98. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1601.08 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25581271
  32. Sidorkina V. M., Polutina N. S. Transformation of the value of education in a virtual society. Integration of Education, 2014, no. 4, pp. 124–128. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/Inted.077.018.201404.124 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22748980 
  33. Al-Awamleh A. Students’ satisfaction with blended learning programmes in the faculty of physical education. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9 (5), pp. 37–47. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1905.03
  34. Zakaria N., Yusof S. A. M. Crossing cultural boundaries using the internet: Toward building a model of swift trust formation in global virtual teams. Journal of International Management, 2020, vol. 26 (1), article 100654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2018.10.004
  35. Jimenez A., Boehe D. M., Taras V., Caprar D. V. Working across boundaries: Current and future perspectives on global virtual teams. Journal of International Management, 2017, vol. 23 (4), pp.  341–349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2017.05.001
  36. Zakaria N. Emergent patterns of switching behaviors and intercultural communication styles of global virtual teams during distributed decision making. Journal of International Management, 2017, vol. 23, Issue 4, pp. 350–366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2016.09.002 
  37. Matveeva N. S. Network space and vocational education. Journal of Pedagogical Innovations, 2015, no. 4, pp. 50–53. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25085276 
  38. Fedorova G. A., Ragulina M. I., Udalov S. R., Lapchik M. P. Distant student-teacher interaction based on modern information and communication technologies. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9 (2), pp. 108–125. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1902.08 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38191468
  39. Hamada M., Hassan M. An interactive learning environment for information and communication theory. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 2017, vol. 13 (1), pp.  35–59. DOI: http://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00603a
  40. Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. The concept of intellectual potential development: the main dimensions and bases within the context of lifelong education (review). Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, vol. 7 (3), pp. 140–156. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1703.09 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29962768
  41. Angreani L. S., Vijaya A. Designing an effective collaboration using information technology towards world class university. Procedia Computer Science, 2017, vol. 124, pp. 577–584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.192
  42. Wang C.-J. Facilitating the emotional intelligence development of students: Use of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 2019, vol. 25, article 100198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2019.100198
  43. Tanak A. Designing TPACK-based course for preparing student teachers to teach science with technological pedagogical content knowledge. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 2018, In press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.07.012
  44. Akyuz D. Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through performance assessment. Computers & Education, 2018, vol. 125, pp. 212–225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.012
  45. Scherer R., Tondeur J., Siddiq F. On the quest for validity: Testing the factor structure and measurement invariance of the technology-dimensions in the technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) model. Computers & Education, 2017, vol. 112, pp. 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.012
  46. Koh J. H. L., Chai C. S., Benjamin W. Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) and design thinking: A framework to support ICT lesson design for 21st century learning. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 2015, vol. 24 (3), pp. 535–543. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0237-2
  47. Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. Education of knowledge society: Specificity of modern development. Monograph. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Publ., 2014, 196 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24960634
  48. McVey M. Changing spaces of education: New perspectives on the nature of learning. International Review of Education, 2013, vol. 59 (6), pp. 805–807. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-013-9394-9
  49. Egger J., Masood T. Augmented reality in support of intelligent manufacturing – A systematic literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2020, vol. 140, article 106195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106195
  50. Herz M., Rauschnabel P. A. Understanding the diffusion of virtual reality glasses: The role of media, fashion and technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, vol. 138, pp.  228–242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.008
  51. Sorko S. R., Brunnhofer M. Potentials of augmented reality in training. Procedia Manufacturing, 2019, vol. 31, pp. 85–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.014
  52. Alalwan N., Cheng L., Al-Samarraie H., Yousef R., Sarsam S. M. Challenges and prospects of virtual reality and augmented reality utilization among primary school teachers: A developing country perspective. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2020, vol. 66, article 100876. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100876
  53. Herbert B., Ens B., Weerasinghe A., Billinghurst M., Wigley G. Design considerations for combining augmented reality with intelligent tutors. Computers & Graphics, 2018, vol. 77, pp.  166–182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2018.09.017
  54. López-Faican L., Jaen J. EmoFindAR: Evaluation of a mobile multiplayer augmented reality game for primary school children. Computers & Education, 2020, vol. 149, article 103814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103814
  55. Innocenti E. D., Geronazzo M., Vescovi D., Nordahl R., Avanzini F. Mobile virtual reality for musical genre learning in primary education. Computers & Education, 2019, vol. 139, pp. 102–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.010
  56. Cho J., Rahimpour S., Cutler A., Goodwin C. R., Codd P. Enhancing reality: A systematic review of augmented reality in neuronavigation and education. World Neurosurgery, 2020, In press, journal pre-proof. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.04.043
  57. Lampropoulos G., Keramopoulos E., Diamantaras K. Enhancing the functionality of augmented reality using deep learning, semantic web and knowledge graphs: A review. Visual Informatics, 2020, vol. 4 (1), pp. 32–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visinf.2020.01.001
  58. Radianti J., Majchrzak T. A., Fromm J., Wohlgenannt I. A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 2020, vol. 147, article 103778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
  59. Harley J. M., Poitras E. G., Jarrell A., Duffy M. C., Lajoie S. P. Comparing virtual and location-based augmented reality mobile learning: Emotions and learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2016, vol. 64 (3), pp. 359–388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9420-7  
  60. Georgiou Y., Kyza E. A. Relations between student motivation, immersion and learning outcomes in location-based augmented reality settings. Computers in Human Behavior, 2018, vol. 89, pp.  173–181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.011
  61. Chou T.-L., Wu J.-J., Tsai C.-C. Research trends and features of critical thinking studies in e-learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2019, vol. 57 (4), pp. 1038–1077. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118774350
  62. Ifenthaler D., Adcock A. B., Erlandson B. E. Challenges for education in a connected world: Digital learning, data rich environments, and computer-based assessment-introduction to the inaugural special issue of technology, knowledge and learning. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 2014, vol. 19 (1–2), pp. 121–126. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-014-9228-2
Date of the publication 30.04.2020