Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 108–126
© Soboleva E. V., Suvorova T., Bidaibekov Y. Y., Balykbayev T. O., 2020
UDC: 
371.134:004(07)

Designing a personalized learning model for working with technologies of creating three-dimensional images

Soboleva E. V. 1 (Kirov, Russian Federation), Suvorova T. 1 (Kirov, Russian Federation), Bidaibekov Y. Y. 2 (Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan), Balykbayev T. O. 2 (Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan)
1 Vyatka State University
2 Abai Kazakh National pedagogical University
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 839
Abstract: 

Introduction. The authors investigate the problem of realizing the potential of 3D-technologies for creating personalized learning trajectories.
The purpose of the study is to identify the characteristic features of designing a personalized learning model when working with technologies for creating three-dimensional images.
Materials and Methods. The study involves reviewing international and Russian scholarly literature on the issues of personalized learning and the use of 3D technologies in science and education. The experimental methods were employed to verify the theoretical features of designing a personalized learning model when working with 3D images. To evaluate the obtained data, the authors used empirical methods (observation and analysis of the test results and three-dimensional models). A criteria-based assessment matrix was developed. The educational experiment involved 10-11-grade students in Kirov (the Russian Federation). The statistical significance of the qualitative changes was verified by means of G test.
Results. The authors conducted a theoretical analysis in order to clarify the concepts of ‘personalized learning’ and ‘personal learning trajectory’, which allowed them to identify the priorities of the digital society for the field of education. Further theoretical analysis revealed the key problems of personalized learning (choice awareness, determining the characteristics of the educational model, and designing learning trajectories) and considered them from the perspectives of teachers and students. The educational potential of 3D-technologies for improving learning outcomes and facilitating personalized learning was described. The design of a personalized environment when working with 3D-image creation technologies was described with the main focus on ‘Choosing your learning path’ model.
Conclusions. The article summarizes the characteristic features of designing a personalized learning model when working in 3D modeling environments to improve learning outcomes, prepare competitive professionals, and create innovations in science and technology.

Keywords: 

Three-dimensional modeling; 3D-technologies; Didactic potential; Personalization; learning trajectory, Digital society; Learning outcomes.

URL WoS/RSCI: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:43091312

Prominence Percentile SciVal: 91.645 Electronic Books | Online Learning | Context-Aware

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85092663128&origin=...

Designing a personalized learning model for working with technologies of creating three-dimensional images

For citation:
Soboleva E. V., Suvorova T., Bidaibekov Y. Y., Balykbayev T. O. Designing a personalized learning model for working with technologies of creating three-dimensional images. Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 108–126. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2003.06
References: 
  1. Asmolov A. G. Race for the future: “… Now here comes what’s next”. Russian Education and Society, 2018, vol. 60 (5), pp. 381–391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10609393.2018.1495017  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35735964
  2. Benzer A. I., Yildiz B. The effect of computer-aided 3D modeling activities on pre-service teachers’ spatial abilities and attitudes towards 3d modeling. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 2019, vol. 18 (3), pp. 335–348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.335 URL: http://oaji.net/articles/2019/987-1559372061.pdf
  3. Buzzi M. C., Buzzi M., Perrone E., Senette C. Personalized technology-enhanced training for people with cognitive impairment. Universal Access in the Information Society, 2019, vol. 18 (4), pp.  891–907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-018-0619-3
  4. Damyanov I., Tsankov N. The role of infographics for the development of skills for cognitive modeling in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 2018, vol. 13 (01), pp. 82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i01.7541
  5. Chugunov M., Polunina I. N. Interdisciplinary modelling of robots using CAD/CAE technology. Mordovia University Bulletin, 2018, vol. 28 (2), pp. 181–190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/0236-2910.028.201802  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35139176
  6. Hallström J., Schönborn K. J. Models and modelling for authentic STEM education: Reinforcing the argument. International Journal of STEM Education, 2019, vol. 6 (1), pp. 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0178-z
  7. Hsu J., Zhen Y., Lin T., Chiu Y. Affective content analysis of music emotion through EEG. Multimedia Systems, 2018, vol. 24 (2), p. 195–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00530-017-0542-0
  8. Huang T.-Ch., Lin Ch.-Y. From 3D modeling to 3D printing: Development of a differentiated spatial ability teaching model. Telematics and Informatics, 2017, vol. 34 (2), pp. 604–613.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.10.005
  9. Huang T.-Ch., Chen M.-Y., Lin Ch.-Y. Exploring the behavioral patterns transformation of learners in different 3D modeling teaching strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 2019, vol. 92, pp.  670–678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.028
  10. Khan A., Breslav S., Hornbæk K. Interactive instruction in bayesian inference. Human-Computer Interaction, 2018, vol. 33 (3), pp. 207–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2016.1203264
  11. Novak E., Wisdom S. Effects of 3D printing project-based learning on preservice elementary teachers’ science attitudes, science content knowledge, and anxiety about teaching science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2018, vol. 27 (5), pp. 412–432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9733-5
  12. Nuri A., Sajidan Mr., Oetomo D., Prasetyanti N., Parmin P. Improving Indonesian senior high school students’ critical thinking skill through science integrated learning (SIL) model. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 2019, vol. 4 (2), pp. 145–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v4i2.3144
  13. Rodríguez-Martín M., Rodríguez-Gonzálvez P., Sánchez-Patrocinio A., Sánchez J. R. Short CFD simulation activities in the context of fluid-mechanical learning in a multidisciplinary student body. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 2019, vol. 9 (22), pp. 4809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app9224809
  14. Sánchez A., Gonzalez-Gaya C., Zulueta P., Sampaio Z. Introduction of building information modeling in industrial engineering education: Students’ perception. Applied Sciences, 2019, vol. 9 (16), pp. 3287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app9163287
  15. Tømte C. E., Fossland T., Aamodt P.O., Degn L. Digitalisation in higher education: mapping institutional approaches for teaching and learning. Quality in Higher Education, 2019, vol. 25 (1), pp. 98–114. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2019.1603611
  16. Virtanen M. A., Haavisto E., Liikanen E., Kääriäinen M. Students’ perceptions on the use of a ubiquitous 360° learning environment in histotechnology: A pilot study. Journal of Histotechnology, 2018, vol. 41 (2), pp. 49–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01478885.2018.1439680
  17. Vuojärvi H., Eriksson M., Vartiainen H. Cross-boundary collaboration and problem-solving to promote 21st century skills – students’ experiences. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 2019, vol. 18 (13), pp. 30–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.13.3
  18. Yau J. Y., Hristova Z. Evaluation of an extendable context-aware “Learning java” app with personalized user profiling. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 2018, vol. 23 (2), pp. 315–330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9339-7
  19. Asmolov G. A., Asmolov A. G. The Internet as a generative space: Historical-evolutional perspective. Questions of Psychology, 2019, no. 4, pp. 3–28. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42199487
  20. Asmolov A. G., Guseltseva M. S. Value sense of sociocultural modernization of education: From reforms to reformation. Bulletin of RGGU. Psychology. Pedagogy. Education, 2019, no. 1, pp. 18–43. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6398-2019-1-18-43  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39143022
  21. Barabanova S. V., Kaybiyaynen A., Kraysman N. Digitalization of education in the global context. Higher Education in Russia, 2019, vol. 28 (1), pp. 94–103. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-1-94-103 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36826103
  22. Belyakova E. G., Zakharova, I. G. Interaction of university students with educational content in the conditions of information educational environment. The Education and Science Journal, 2019, vol.  21 (3), pp. 77–105. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2019-3-77-105  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37312421
  23. Lyakh Yu. A. The model of personalized learning organization in modern school. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 2019, no. 3, pp. 16–20. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/1813-145X-2019-10410 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38510533
  24. Mudrakova O. A., Latushkina S. A. Using didactic capabilities of 3d modeling for the development of spatial thinking of students. Questions of Pedagogy, 2020, no. 1–1, pp. 139–144. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41804676
  25. Nekrasov S. I. Interrelated processes of digitalization of the modern Russian science and education. The Education and Science Journal, 2018, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 162–179. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2018-2-162-179 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32561587
  26. Osipova S. I., Gafurova N. V., Rudnitsky E. A. Formation of soft skills in the conditions of social and public practices of students in the implementation of the educational program in the ideology of the CDIO international initiative. Perspectives of Science and Education, 2019, no. 4, pp. 91–101. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2019.4.8 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39544349
  27. Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. The phenomenon of social information in education: Modern research practices (a critical review). Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9 (6), pp. 52–71. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1906.04 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41586633
  28. Somkin A. A. Personally-oriented approach in the system of education in the humanities: From monologism to dialogical model of teaching. The Education and Science Journal, 2019, vol. 21  (3), pp. 9–28. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2019-3-9-28 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37312418
  29. Stolbova I. D., Aleksandrova E. P., Kochurova L. V., Nosov K.G. Profile aspects of graphic education at polytechnic university. Higher Education in Russia, 2019, vol. 28 (3), pp. 155–166. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-3  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37184539
  30. Charikova I. N., Kargapoltsev S. M., Likhnenko E. V. Activity Potential of the Category "Ignorance" in Epistemological Space of the Educational Paradigm. Higher Education in Russia, 2019, vol. 28 (12), pp. 77-86. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-12-77-86 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41551369
  31. Khutorskoy A. V. Methodological foundations for applying the competence approach to designing education. Higher Education in Russia, 2017, no. 12, pp. 85–91. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30770728
Date of the publication 30.06.2020