Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 175–188

Comprehension of the cultural component of vocabulary as a precondition for successful communication with native speakers

Merkish N. E. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation)
1 Moscow MGIMO University

Introduction. The article explores the problem of understanding the cultural component of the meaning of lexical units as a prerequisite for successful communication with a native speaker. The purpose of the article is to identify the main features of learning linguo-cultural information which constitutes the cultural component of the word meaning, in order to communicate across cultures.
Materials and Methods. The research methods included questionnaires, interviews, reviewing scholarly literature, analysis and systematization of empirical data. The study was carried out for three years. It involved 105 students (12 groups) studying German as a second foreign language at MGIMO University of Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Results. The article summarizes a number of studies into cultural specifics of vocabulary. The levels of explication of the vocabulary, which are designated as contextual, culturally neutral and culturally specific, are described. It was revealed that the process of word comprehension involves not only transmitting and understanding information, but using it in real communication. Thus, it can be considered as an information-practical process. In addition, the most effective means of semantization have been identified, allowing to comprehend the cultural component of the word.
Conclusions. As a result of the research, the identified features of understanding the cultural component of vocabulary for successful communication with a native speaker are summarized.

For citation:
Merkish N. E. Comprehension of the cultural component of vocabulary as a precondition for successful communication with native speakers. Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 175–188. DOI:
  1. Alber K. Vocabulary Breadth, Vocabulary Depth, and Fluency –A theoretical framework and empirical evidence of lexical competence [Wortschatzumfang, Wortschatztiefe und Verarbeitungsgeschwindigkeit – Analyse der lexikalischen Kompetenz]. Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Linguistik, 2016, vol. 65 (1), pp. 107–128. DOI:
  2. Belyaeva I. G., Samorodova E. A., Voron O. V., Zakirova E. S. Analysis of innovative methods’ effectiveness in teaching foreign languages for special purposes used for the formation of future specialists’ professional competencies. Education Sciences, 2019, vol. 9 (3), pp. 171. DOI:
  3. Binder K. S., Cote N. G., Lee C., Bessette E., Vu H. Beyond breadth: The contributions of vocabulary depth to reading comprehension among skilled readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 2017, vol. 40 (3), pp. 333–343. DOI:
  4. Dalle A., Burhanuddin, Usman M. The effectiveness of domino card games to improve German language vocabulary. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2018, vol. 1028. DOI:
  5. Donnelly S., Kidd E. Individual differences in lexical processing efficiency and vocabulary in toddlers: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2020, vol. 192, pp. 104781. DOI:
  6. El-Khechen W., McElvany N., Wolter I., Kessels U. What does “cannibalistic”, “to torture” and “to destroy” mean? gender-specific vocabulary of primary school children depending on language background [Was heißt „kannibalisch“, „foltern“ und „zerstören“?: Geschlechtsspezifischer Wortschatz von Grundschulkindern in Abhängigkeit von der Familiensprache]. Psychologie in Erziehung Und Unterricht, 2017, vol. 64 (2), pp. 123–137. DOI:
  7. Grimminger A., Rohlfing K. J. Multimodal communication in joint book reading and its relation to later vocabulary size [Multimodale Kommunikation in frühen Buchlesesituationen und ihr Zusammenhang mit dem späteren Wortschatz]. Sprache Stimme Gehör, 2019, vol. 43 (2), pp. 93–99. DOI:
  8. Haman E., Łuniewska M., Hansen P., Simonsen H. G., Chiat S., Bjekić J., . . . Armon-Lotem S. Noun and verb knowledge in monolingual preschool children across 17 languages: Data from cross-linguistic lexical tasks (LITMUS-CLT). Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 2017, vol. 31 (11–12), pp. 818–843. DOI:
  9. Haß U. The promising context and its capacity for deduction of word meanings [Der verheißungsvolle Kontext und seine Leistungen bei der Erschließung von Wortbedeutungen]. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik, 2018, vol. 69, pp. 33–68. DOI:

10. McElvany N.Ohle A.El-Khechen W.Hardy I.Cinar M. Supporting language competencies – The potential of the family language for vocabulary acquisition from texts [Förderung sprachlicher Kompetenzen – Das Potenzial der Familiensprache für den Wortschatzerwerb aus Texten]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 2017, vol. 31 (1), pp. 13–25. DOI:

11. Streubel B., Gunzenhauser C., Grosse G., Saalbach H. Emotion-specific vocabulary and its contribution to emotion understanding in 4- to 9-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2020, vol. 193, pp. 104790. DOI:

12. Tareva E. G., Tarev B. V. The assessment of students’ professional communicative competence: New challenges and possible solutions. XLinguae, 2018, vol. 11 (2), pp. 758–783. DOI:

13. Tretyakova O. V., Karakozov S. D., Voevoda E. V. Media consumption trends in Russia under digitalization. Media Watch, 2019, vol. 10 (2), pp. 197–211. DOI:

14. Baiguzhin P. A., Shibkova D. Z., Aizman R. I., Factors affecting psychophysiological processes of information perception within the context of education informatization. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9 (5), pp. 48–70. (In Russian) DOI: URL:

15. Borzova T. V., Mosunova L. A., The conditions for fostering meaningful understanding of information in learning. Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10 (1), pp. 7–24. (In Russian) DOI: URL:

16. Byrdina O. G., Dolzhenko S. G., Yurinova E. A. Formation of foreign-language communicative competence of non-philological training profile students by means of Content-based Active Speaking Technology. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, vol. 8 (4), pp. 7–25. (In Russian) DOI: URL:

17. Nyman Ye. A., Gural S. K., Smokotin V. M., Bovtenko M. A. Interrelations of languages and cultures and the role of culture in language teaching and learning. Language and Culture, 2013, no. 1, pp. 90–106. (In Russian) URL:

18. Evteev S. V. Phenomenaof culture in the aspect of interlanguage communication. Bulletin of the Bryansk State University, 2015, no. 2, pp. 292–296. (In Russian) URL:

19. Millrood R. P., Maksimova I. R. Learner bilingualism: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Language and Culture, 2017, no. 37, pp. 185–204. (In Russian) DOI: URL:

20. Mosunova L. A., Diner E. V., Buldakova Y. V. Psychological and educational principles of developing students’ speech culture in the process of creating media texts. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9 (2), pp. 7–22. (In Russian) DOI: URL:

21. Safonova V. V. Co-Learning of languages and cultures in the mirror of world tendencies in developing modern language education.Language and Culture, 2014, no. 1, pp. 123–141. (In Russian) URL:

22. Skorova L. V., Smyk Y. V. Psychological media competence of a parent: The main content and structure. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9 (1), pp. 137–156. (In Russian) DOI: URL:

23. Chernikova I. V. The Problem of “language and thought” in the light of the systemic-evolutionary method.Language and Culture, 2016, no. 2, pp. 207–216. (In Russian) DOI: URL:

24. Chigasheva M. А. Communication peculairities in the German language. Philological Sciences at MGIMO, 2015, no. 4, pp. 60–70. (In Russian) URL:

Date of the publication 31.08.2020