Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 43–61
© Savchenkov A. V., 2020
UDC: 
378+159.96

Sustainable motivation for teaching as a component of teacher education students’ professional flexibility

Savchenkov A. V. 1 (Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation)
1 South Ural State Humanitarian Pedagogical University
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 1565
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article addresses the issue of developing teacher education students’ professional flexibility as a component of their professional competence. The aim of the study is to identify the levels of sustainable motivation for teaching as a component of prospective teachers’ professional flexibility.
Materials and Methods. The authors adopt a systemic activity-based approach established by V. P. Bespalko and D. B. Elkonin as well as a structural approach to personality studies. The research methods include questionnaires, reviewing and analysis of scholarly literature. The empirical study of students' motivation for teaching has been conducted for 4 years. The study involved 213 1st-year students doing the undergraduate degree in the field of vocational education and majoring in Computer Science and Computer Engineering, Transport, Decorative and Applied Arts and Design, and Economics and Management at Vocational Pedagogical Institute of South Ural State Humanitarian and Pedagogical University in Chelyabinsk (Russia). The participants completed a questionnaire designed by the authors.
Results. The article clarifies the notions of professional stability and professional flexibility, explains their relationship and interdependence, and highlights their significance for teaching. The theoretical analysis of developing professional flexibility has enabled the authors to conclude that sustainable motivation for teaching is a key component of professional flexibility. According to the obtained data, it was found that more than a third of teacher education students had chosen the university and the field of study taking into account rather low entry requirements they could complete having low scores at National Examinations (Unified State Examinations). This trend might have a negative impact on the process of developing their sustainable motivation for teaching. The obtained empirical results indicated that the teacher education students’ had insufficient level of sustainable motivation for teaching. Therefore, the authors justify the need for interventions aimed at enhancing teacher education students’ sustainable motivation for teaching.
Conclusions. The authors summarize the characteristic features of sustainable motivation for teaching as a component of prospective teachers’ professional flexibility and emphasize the need for interventions aimed at its development.

Keywords: 

Prospective teacher (teacher education student); Professional stability; Professional flexibility; Motivation for teaching.

URL WoS/RSCI: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:42525585

Prominence Percentile SciVal: 99.370 Pedagogical Support | Educational Process | Professional Competence

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85081258461&origin=...

Sustainable motivation for teaching as a component of teacher education students' professional flexibility

For citation:
Savchenkov A. V. Sustainable motivation for teaching as a component of teacher education students’ professional flexibility. Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 43–61. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2001.03
References: 
  1. Börü N. The factors affecting teacher-motivation. International Journal of Instruction, 2018, vol.  11 (4), pp. 761–776. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11448a
  2. Choi M. J., Whang M.-Ch. A study on behavior response of child by emotion coaching of teacher based on emotional recognition technology. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 2017, vol.  8  (7), pp. 323–330. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2017.8.7.323  
  3. Dennis J. P., Vander Wall J. S. The cognitive flexibility inventory: Instrument development and estimates of reliability and validity. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2010, vol. 34 (3), pp. 241–253. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10608-009-9276-4
  4. Good T. L., Lavigne A. L. Issues of teacher performance stability are not new: Limitations and possibilities. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 2014, vol. 23 (2), pp. 1–16. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.1916
  5. Han J., Yin H. Teacher motivation: Definition, research development and implications for teachers. Cogent Education, 2016, vol. 3, art. no. 1217819. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1217819
  6. Iancu A., Rusu A., Maroiu C., Pacurar R., Maricutoiu L. The effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing teacher burnout: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 2018, vol. 30 (2), pp.  373–396. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9420-8
  7. Kang M. A., Cavanagh M. S. Classroom ready? Pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy for their first professional experience placement. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 2018, vol. 43 (7), pp.  134–151. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n7.8
  8. Keller M. M., Chang M. L., Becker E. S., Goetz M., Frenzel A. C. Teachers’ emotional experiences and exhaustion as predictors of emotional labor in the classroom: an experience sampling study. Frontiers in Psychology, 2014, vol. 5, pp. 1442. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01442
  9. Kunter M., Klusmann U., Baumert J., Ritcher D., Voss T., Hachfeld A. Professional competence of teachers: effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2013, vol. 105 (3), pp. 805–820. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0032583 
  10. Lee M., Pekrun R., Taxer J., Schutz P., Vogl E., Xie X. Teachers' emotions and emotion management: integrating emotion regulation theory with emotional labor research. Social Psychology of Education, 2016, vol. 19 (4), pp. 843–863. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11218-016-9359-5
  11. Martin M. M., Rubin R. B. A new measure of cognitive flexibility. Psychological Reports, 1995, vol.  76 (2), pp. 623–626. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1995.76.2.623
  12. Mohammadi M., Ahmadipour N., Kouhdasht R. N., Bordbar N. Flexibility of Iranian teachers teaching methods and high school students’ gains. Modern Applied Science, 2016, vol. 10 (10), pp.  48–54. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/mas.v10n10p48
  13. Savchenkov A. V. Aspects of formation of teachers professional stability. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences, 2019, vol. 80, pp. 702–710. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.09.02.80
  14. Serkan D., Doğanay A. The effects of multiple-pedagogical agents on learners’ academic success, motivation, and cognitive load. Computers & Education, 2017, vol. 111, pp. 74–100. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.005
  15. Tohidi H., Tmomhaiddi M. The effects of motivation in education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, vol. 31, pp. 820–824. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.148
  16. Velthuis C., Fisser P., Pieters J. Teacher training and pre-service primary teachers’ self-efficacy for science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, vol. 25, pp. 445–464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9363-y
  17. Voss T., Wagner W., Klusmann U., Trautwein U., Kunter M. Changes in beginning teachers' classroom management knowledge and emotional exhaustion during the induction phase. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2017, vol. 51, pp. 170–184. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.08.002
  18. Wong V., Ruble L., Yu Y., McGrew J. Too stressed to teach? Teaching quality, student engagement, and IEP outcomes. Exceptional Children, 2017, vol. 83 (4), pp. 412–427. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0014402917690729
  19. Baibakov A. M. Chudina E. E. Development of motivation of educational and cognitive activity of future teachers in the conditions of an integral educational process. Proceedings of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University, 2017, no. 3, pp. 65–68. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28998261
  20. Derkach A. A. Optimization of personal and professional development of students based on the acmeologiche capacity of professional disciplines. Acmeology, 2014, no. 1–2, pp. 15–17. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22632006
  21. Dombrovskaya I. V. Professional flexibility of the library staff as a necessary condition for the promotion of books and reading in contemporary society. Bulletin of the far Eastern Scientific Library, 2007, no. 2, pp. 164–173. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23916993
  22. Kornilova T. V. The principle of uncertainty in psychology of choice and risk. Psychological Research, 2015, vol. 8 (40), pp. 3. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23593080
  23. Mitina L. M. Psychology of personal and professional development of subjects of education: monograph. SPb., 2014, 376 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26764907
  24. Perevalova A. A. Professional stability of the future teacher. Article 3. Research of professional stability of the teacher. Bulletin of the Kemerovo State University, 2014, no. 4–1, pp. 81–86. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22777527
  25. Todysheva T. Y. Personal flexibility in professional activity. Bulletin of the Buryat state University, 2010, no. 5, pp. 84–88. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15165284
  26. Yakovleva I. P., Romanova M. L., Kiseleva E. S., Matveeva L. A. Modern methods of teachers professional reliability evaluation. Scientific Works of the Kuban State Technological University, 2017, no. 2, pp. 259–269. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29952620
Date of the publication 29.02.2020