Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 191–203
UDC: 
УДК 159.91 + 364.026

Social workers’ professional potential: Psychophysiological and social criteria

Antipova E. I. 1 (Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation), Shibkova D. Z. 2 (Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation)
1 South Ural State Humanitarian and Pedagogical University
2 South Ural State University
Abstract: 

Introduction. Introduction of social workers’ professional standards raises the problem of developing psychophysiological criteria for their professional potential. The aim of the research is to reveal psychophysiological factors of social workers’ professional potential in terms of their efficiency, quality of life and level of job satisfaction.
Materials and Methods. In order to identify social workers’ essential traits and qualities, the authors have analyzed ‘Standards of proficiency for social workers’. Social workers’ psychophysiological status is described in terms of their CNS performance indicators and their working efficiency level. The research methodology involves T. D. Loskutova’s PC-based chronoreflexometry modified by M. P. Moroz. Moreover, the research programme includes evaluating the following: quality of life indicators (‘SF-36 Health Status Survey’), level of work satisfaction (V. A. Rozanova’s psychodiagnostic method) and self-assessment of health status (a questionnaire).
Results. The paper reveals and describes psychophysiological criteria of social workers’ proficiency. This is the first study reporting the parameters of social workers’ CNS functional status and their working efficiency levels. The study has found that two-thirds of the participants are characterized by high capacity to adapt to complicated working conditions. Analysis of CNS performance indicators reveals a high-risk group among social workers demonstrating low efficiency during long-term observation, which indicates low level of professional trustworthiness within the identified group. The authors do not observe a direct correlation between working efficiency and termination of professional responsibility. Further analysis exposes the absence of a highly reliable correlation between the majority of life quality indicators and functional state of the body. The only slightly positive correlation is the one between a life quality indicator ‘role limitations due to physical health’ and the parameters of social workers’ CNS functional status and of their working efficiency (i.e. stability of neural response and functionality level).
Conclusions. Lack of highly reliable correlations between life quality indicators and functional state of the body, between personal job satisfaction, hand-eye coordination and life quality indicators have enabled the authors to conclude that the main criterion of social workers’ professional potential is their psychophysiological status, i.e. stability of neural response and CNS functionality level.

Keywords: 
For citation:
Antipova E. I., Shibkova D. Z. Social workers’ professional potential: Psychophysiological and social criteria. Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 191–203. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2001.11
References: 
  1. Antipova E. I., Shibkova D. Z. Assessment of psychophysiological status and quality of life of social work specialists. Human. Sport. Medicine, 2017, vol. 17 (2), pp. 30–39. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29319708
  2. Antipova E. I., Shibkova D. Z. Evaluation of the life quality of specialists in the social work with the use of the SF-36 questionnaire. Hygiene & Sanitation, 2016, vol. 95 (4), pp. 369–375. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26131963
  3. Arhipova E. B., Pankova S. N. Informatization of the social sphere in the conditions of modern modernization processes. Herald of Omsk University, 2015, no. 3, pp. 226–231. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24898631
  4. Arutjunov A. T., Tourzin P. S. On preservation and improvement of occupational health of governmental employees. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology, 2006, no. 5, pp. 1–7. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=12111017
  5. Belinskaya E. P., Melnikova N. M., Pisareva L. Yu. The humanitarian aspects of health and wellness: causes of research interest and main theoretical approaches. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University, 2017, no. 2, pp. 111–116. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29407839
  6. Bibalaeva U. N. The realization of the competence approach in the practical activity of social workers. Surgut State University Journal, 2015, no. 2, pp. 111–114. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25056231
  7. Govorukhina A. A., Kolesnikova E. N., Lozhkina-Gametzkaya N. I., Scherbakova A. E. Quality of life as an indicator of functional adaptation of oil and gas industry workers in the northern region. Population Health and Environment, 2017, no. 1, pp. 23–26. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28408448
  8. Gurvich V. B., Kuzmin S. V., Plotko E. G., Rosly O. F., Fedoruk A. A., Ruzakov V. O. Analysis of the methodic approaches to the occupational risk assessment at the enterprises of the Sverdlovsk region. Hygiene & Sanitation, 2015, vol. 94 (2), pp. 119–123. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23273042
  9. Dubel E. V., Unguryanu T. N. Estimation of health risk factors perception by medical workers. Human Ecology, 2015, no. 2, pp. 33–41. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23033985
  10. Karavanova L. Zh. Social work expert's professional competence. World of Education – Education in the World, 2011, no. 2, pp. 117–123. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17307880
  11. Korelskaya I. E., Kuznetsov A. A. Evaluation of the central nervous system in human parameters of simple visual-motor response. International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research, 2016, no. 8, pp. 194–197. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26426367
  12. Maslov N. B., Bloschinsky I. A., Galushkina E. A., Rogovanov D. Y. Conceptual approach to assessment of experts’ functional status in their professional activity. Human Ecology, 2012, no. 4, pp. 16–24. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17641529
  13. Radysh I. V., Ragozin O. N., Shalamova E. Yu. Biological rhythms, quality of life and health. Moscow, RUDN, 2016, 460 p. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26010813
  14. Sitdikov R. Z., Piskarev Yu. G., Kamaev I. A. Social-hygienic and professional factors, affecting on the health of workers of the confectionery plant. Hygiene & Sanitation, 2014, vol. 93 (3), pp.  49–52. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21830992
  15. Kharlashova N. V., Chebotarjev P. A. Influence of environment factors on the morbidity rate with temporary disability of working in oil refinery workers. Hygiene & Sanitation, 2015, vol. 94 (3), pp. 48–52. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23587796
  16. Shamionov R. M., Beskova T. V. Methods of diagnostics of subjective well-being of the person. Psychological Studies, 2018, no. 11, pp. 8. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36318192
  17. Shutova S. V., Muravyova I. V. Sensorimotor reactions as characteristics of functional state of CNS. Tambov University Review, 2013, vol. 18 (5–3), pp. 2831–2840. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20434160
  18. Boddy J., Dominelli L. Social Media and Social Work: The Challenges of a New Ethical Space. Australian Social Work, 2017, vol. 70 (2), pp. 172–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2016.1224907     
  19. Dominelli L. Globalization, contemporary challenges and social work practice. International Social Work, 2010, vol. 53 (5), pp. 599–612. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0020872810371201   
  20. Engen M., Nissen M., Uggerhøj L. Challenges in social work research – Conflicts, barriers and possibilities in relation to social work. European Journal of Social Work, 2019, vol. 22 (5), pp.  735–737. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2019.1640004  
  21. Hafford-Letchfield T., Engelbrecht L. Contemporary practices in social work supervision: time for new paradigms? European Journal of Social Work, 2018, vol. 21 (3), pp. 329–332. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1446782
  22. Sitter K. C., Curnew A. H. The application of social media in social work community Practice. Social Work Education, 2016, vol. 35 (3), pp. 271–283. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2015.1131257  
  23. Teater B. Social Work Research and Its Relevance to Practice: “The Gap Between Research and Practice Continues to be Wide”. Journal of Social Service Research, 2017, vol. 43 (5), pp. 547–565. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2017.1340393
  24. Wolan-Nowakowska M. Importance of Competence of Social Work Special Educator. Lubelski Rocznik Pedagogiczny, 2016, vol. 35 (3), pp. 153–163. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/lrp.2016.35.3.153  
Date of the publication 29.02.2020