Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 72–95
UDC: 
17:37.01

The problem of contemplation and contemplative practicies in education

Kozhevnikova M. N. 1 (St. Petersburg, Russian Federation)
1 Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
Abstract: 

Introduction. The relevance of the article is explained by modern education policy and education practices determined by it, which are aimed at fixed learning outcomes. It leads to the problem of losing interest in learning processes. Therefore, the aim of the article is to problematize the procedural aspect in education and study contemplative educational practices as process-focused ones. The research objectives are to outline contemplative trends in modern education, to summarize and analyze them in the light of the philosophy of education.
Materials and Methods. The basis of the research is phenomenological methodology. The author applies general methods of the philosophy of education and adopted phenomenological, socio-phenomenological, and cross-cultural approaches. Furthermore, the research methodology comprises socio-philosophical criticism in the analysis of modern educational reality and educational policy; historical genetic and historical comparative methods in the analysis of educational trends and practices in different countries in different historical periods; methods of typology and generalization of common trends; and etymological and semantic analysis of concepts. The research materials include international and Russian publications on practical and theoretical aspects of education and philosophy. The author also employs personal experience of participant observation when carrying out specific practices.
Results. Section 1 of the article presents the research problem which is fixation on learning outcomes and examines the experiences of coping with it in education with examples of educational practices. The necessity to pay more attention to process has been problematized and the issue of contemplation in education has been justified. The most important aspects of the experiences under discussion (“slowing down”; “stopping”, “silence”) were identified and analyzed. In a broader perspective, an analysis of the contemplative movement in education, as a whole, has been conducted. Section 2 is devoted to the phenomenon of contemplation as such and presents its well-known interpretations along with author's analysis of its nature as a special phenomenon, primarily from the point of view of the philosophy of subjectivity. On this basis, the essence of contemplative practices and such meanings as the discovery of another, of the Other, the development of empathy are clarified. Section 3 focuses on research results, clarifies the meaning and place of contemplation in modern education and, moreover, suggests some ideas for further use of contemplative practices.
Conclusions. In conclusion, the author summarizes research results about the issues of contemplation and contemplative practices in modern education.

Keywords: 

Contemplative practices; Educational philosophy; Educational policy; Subjectness; Empathy; Emotional-social learning; Mindfulness.

URL WoS/RSCIhttps://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:41271741

Prominence Percentile SciVal: 93.466 Enactivism | Neurophenomenology | Participatory Sense-Making

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85074669439&origin=...

The problem of contemplation and contemplative practicies in education

For citation:
Kozhevnikova M. N. The problem of contemplation and contemplative practicies in education. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 72–95. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1905.05
References: 
  1. Kozhevnikova M. N. Resisting managerism: Management for creative autonomous reflexive teacher. Person and Education, 2018, no. 2, pp. 195-199. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36589373
  2. Kozhevnikova M. N. Russian civilization, mentality and strategic learning objectives. Society and power, 2017, no. 4, pp. 36–42. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30738126
  3. Kozhevnikova M. N. The concept of growth-development in Dewey’s philosophy of education as a method and a result. Philosophy of Education, 2013, no. 5, pp. 122–130. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21088828
  4. Mareeva E. V., Mareev S. N. The problem of thinking: Contemplative and activity approach. Moscow, Academic Project Publ., 2013, 281 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22323073
  5. Khrustaleva A. V. Gershenzon's slow reading: At the sources of method. Bulletin of Tambov University. Series: Humanities, 2009, no. 6, pp. 288–298. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=13056690
  6. Ergas O. The deeper teachings of mindfulness-based ‘interventions” as a reconstruction of ‘education’. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 2015, vol. 49 (2), pp. 203–220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12137
  7. Forbes S. H. Holistic education. An analysis of its ideas and nature. Brandon, VT Foundations for Educational Renewal Publ., 2003, 404 p. URL: http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Holistic%20education.%20An%20analysis%20of%20its%20ideas%20and%20nature&author=S.%20H..%20Forbes&publication_year=2003
  8. Forrest M. Practising silence in teaching. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 2013, vol. 47 (4), pp. 605–622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12043
  9. Hart T. Opening the contemplative mind in the classroom. Journal of Transformative Education, 2004,vol. 2 (1), pp. 28–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344603259311
  10. Jaworski A., Sachdev I. Beliefs about silence in the classroom. Language and Education, 1998, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 273–292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500789808666754
  11. Jurow S. A. Cultivating Self in the context of transformative professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 2009, vol. 60, no. 3. URL: https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-204418641/cultivating-self-in-the-context-of-transformative
  12. Lewin D. Behold: Silence and attention in education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 2014, vol. 48 (3), pp. 355–369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12074
  13. Miedema J. Slow Reading. Duluth, MN, Litwin Books Publ., 2009. ISBN 10: 1936117363 URL: https://openlibrary.org/books/OL22853304M/Slow_reading
  14. Mikics D. Slow reading in a hurried age. Harvard University press Publ., 2013, 336 p. ISBN 10: 0674724720 URL: https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674724723
  15. Newkirk T. The art of slow reading: Six time-honored practices for engagement. Heinemann Educational Books, 2011, 224 p. ISBN 0325037310 (ISBN13: 9780325037318)
  16. Ollin R. Silent pedagogy and rethinking classroom practice: Structuring teaching through silence rather than talk. Cambridge Journal of Education, 2008, vol. 38, issue 2, pp. 265–280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640802063528
  17. Palmer P. J. To Know as We Are Known: Education as a Spiritual Journey. New York, HarperCollins Publ., 1993. URL: http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=To%20know% 20as%20we%20are%20known%3A%20Education%20as%20a%20spiritual%20journey&author=P.%20J..%20Palmer&publication_year=1993
  18. Schinkel A. The educational importance of deep wonder. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 2017, vol. 51 (2), pp. 538–553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12233
  19. Trahan H. A. The silent teacher: A performative. Meditative Model of Pedagogy Liminalities: A Journal of Performance Studies, 2013, vol. 9, no. 3. URL: http://liminalities.net/9-3/silent.pdf  
  20. Walker M. B. Slow Philosophy Reading against the Institution. Bloomsbury Academiс Publ., 2016, 336 p. ISBN 1474279910 (ISBN13: 9781474279918)
  21. Zimmermann A. C., Morgan W. J. A Time for silence? Its possibilities for dialogue and for reflective learning. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 2016, vol. 35, issue 4, pp. 399–413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-015-9485-0
Date of the publication 31.10.2019