Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 179–195
© Krivolapchuck I. A., Chernova M. B., Savushkina E. V., 2020
UDC: 
612.821

Characteristics of psychophysiological reactivity of children aged 5–6 and 6–8 years during intellectual, sensomotor and physical challenges

Krivolapchuck I. A. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation), Chernova M. B. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation), Savushkina E. V. 2 (Grodno, Republic of Belarus)
1 Institute of Developmental Physiology, Russian Academy of Education
2 Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 1526
Abstract: 

Introduction. Recent years have witnessed theoretical and practical recognition of the problem of measuring children’s psychophysiological reactivity at different developmental stages and identifying its peculiarities during performing different types of tests.
The purpose of the article is to identify the characteristics of children’s psychophysiological reactivity during intellectual, sensormotor and physical loads in transition from preschool to primary school age.
Materials and Methods. The current study involved apparently healthy children aged between 5 and 6 years (n=106) and between 6 and 8 years (n=102). The intellectual load consisted in working with computer-based Anfimov’s tables. Sensor motor load involved chains of visual-motor reactions with choosing from four alternatives using a control panel. Bicycle ergometer tests were conducted to perform graduated physical exercise of moderate intensity. In order to measure psychophysiological reactivity, the authors used omegametry, heart rate variability analysis, blood pressure recordings, measuring electrodermal activity, external respiration, and occasional anxiety. The authors used such statistical methods as variational series, correlation coefficients and identifying statistically significant difference.
Results. The results of this study indicate that intellectual and sensomotor loads performed at maximal speed within time limits with the “threat of punishment” and physical activities of moderate intention cause unidirectional functional changes in the organism. Another important finding was a lower psychophysiological cost of adaptation in schoolchildren aged between 6 and 8 years compared to preschool children aged between 5 and 6 years.
Conclusions. The article concludes that in transition from preschool to primary school age peculiarities of children’s psychophysiological reactivity identified at one type of load remain during performing the other tests. Schoolchildren aged between 6 and 8 years demonstrated higher effectiveness and lower psychophysiological cost of adaptation to intellectual, sensomotor and physical challenges in comparison to 5-6-year-old preschool children.

Keywords: 

Psychophysiological reactivity; Loads of various types; Functional state; Activity efficiency; Age characteristics.

URL WoS/RSCI: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:43091316

Prominence Percentile SciVal: 97.628 Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia | Heart Rate Variability | Autonomic Nervous System

http://apps.webofknowledge.com/full_record.do?product=RSCI&search_mode=G...

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85092670166&origin=...

Characteristics of psychophysiological reactivity of children aged 5-6 and 6-8 years during intellectual, sensomotor and physical challenges

For citation:
Krivolapchuck I. A., Chernova M. B., Savushkina E. V. Characteristics of psychophysiological reactivity of children aged 5–6 and 6–8 years during intellectual, sensomotor and physical challenges. Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 179–195. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2003.10
References: 
  1. Bezrukikh M. M, MachinskayaR. I., Farber D. A. Structural and functional organization of a developing brain and formation of cognitive functions in child ontogeny. Human Physiology, 2009, vol. 35 (6), pp. 10–24. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=12989134
  2. Ilyukhina V. A. Super slow information-control systems in the integration of the life processes of the brain and the body. Human Physiology, 2013, vol. 39 (3), pp. 114–126. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7868/S0131164613030107 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21229093
  3. MachinskayaR. I. Control systems of the brain. Journal of Higher Nervous Activity I. P. Pavlov, 2015, vol. 65 (1), pp. 33–60. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7868 / S0044467715010086 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22995553
  4. Myznikov I. L., Shcherbina F. A. Characteristics of the formation of compensatory and adaptive responses of sailors to chronic stress. Human Physiology, 2006, vol. 32 (3), pp. 92–97. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=9220225
  5. Semenova O. A., Machinskaya R. I. Features of the regulatory components of cognitive activity in children 5-10 years old with changes in the electrical activity of the brain of limbic origin. Journal of Higher Nervous Activity I. P. Pavlov, 2016, vol. 66 (4), pp. 458–469. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7868/S0044467716040109 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26498100
  6. Sobchik L. N. Psychodiagnostics methods as the tool of research of the person and crisis conditions. Personality in Extreme Conditions and Crisis Situations, 2011, no. 1, pp. 85–90. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19076100 
  7. Agorastos A., Pervanidou P., Chrousos G.P., Baker D. G. Developmental trajectories of early life stress and trauma: A narrative review on neurobiological aspects beyond stress system dysregulation. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2019, vol. 10, pp. 118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00118 
  8. Armstrong N., Barker A. R., McManus A. M. Muscle metabolism changes with age and maturation: How do they relate to youth sport performance? British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2015, vol. 49 (13), pp. 860–864. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2014-094491
  9. Boyce W. T. Differential susceptibility of the developing brain to contextual adversity and stress. Neuropsychopharmacology, 2015, vol. 41 (1), pp. 142–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2015.294   
  10. Bush N. R., Caron Z. K., Blackburn K. S., Alkon A. Measuring cardiac autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity in toddlers – Resting and developmental challenges. JoVE, 2016, vol. 108, pp. 53652. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3791/53652
  11. Coulombe B. R., Rudd K. L., Yates T. M. Children's physiological reactivity in emotion contexts and prosocial behavior. Brain and Behavior, 2019, vol. 9 (10). – e01380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1380
  12. De Los Reyes A., Aldao A., Qasmieh N., Dunn E. J., Lipton M. F., Hartman C., Youngstrom E. A., Dougherty L. R., Lerner M. D. Graphical representations of adolescents' psychophysiological reactivity to social stressor tasks: Reliability and validity of the Chernoff face approach and person-centered profiles for clinical use. Psychological Assessment, 2017, vol. 29 (4), pp. 422–434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000354
  13. Dieleman G. C., Huizink A. C., Tulen J. H., Utens E. M., Tiemeier H. Stress reactivity predicts symptom improvement in children with anxiety disorders. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2016, vol. 196, pp. 190–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.02.022
  14. Farber D. A., Machinskaya R. I., Kurgansky A. V., Petrenko N. E. Functional organization of the brain in the period of preparation for recognizing fragmented images in seven- to eight-year-old children and adults. Human Physiology, 2014, vol. 40 (5), pp. 475–482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S036211971405003X
  15. Hamilton J. L., Alloy L. B. A typical reactivity of heart rate variability to stress and depression across development: Systematic review of the literature and directions for future research.  Clinical Psychology Review, 2016, vol. 50, pp. 67–79. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2016.09.003
  16. Hare T. A., Tottenham N., Galvan A. Voss H. U., Glover G. H., Casey B. J. Biological substrates of emotional reactivity and regulation in adolescence during an emotional go–nogo task. Biological Psychiatry, 2008, vol. 63 (10), pp. 927–934. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.03.015 
  17. Johnson A. E., Perry N. B., Hostinar C. E., Gunnar M.R. Cognitive-affective strategies and cortisol stress reactivity in children and adolescents: Normative development and effects of early life stress. Developmental Psychobiology, 2019, vol. 61 (7), pp. 999–1013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.21849
  18. Kovac S., Speckmann E., Gorji A. Uncensored EEG: The role of DC potentials in neurobiology of the brain. Progress in Neurobiology, 2018, Vol. 165–167, pp. 51–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2018.02.001 
  19. Krivolapchuk I. A., Chernova M. B. Physical performance and psychophysiological reactivity of 7-8 year-old children to different types of exercise. Medicina dello Sport, 2012, vol. 65 (2), pp. 173–185. URL: https://www.minervamedica.it/en/journals/medicina-dello-sport/article.php?cod=R26Y2012N02A0173
  20. Lambiase M. J., Dorn J., Roemmich J. N. Systolic blood pressure reactivity during submaximal exercise and acute psychological stress in youth. American Journal of Hypertension, 2013, vol. 26 (3), pp. 409–415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hps036 
  21. Latham M. D., Cook N., Simmons J. G., Byrne M. L., Kettle J. W. L., Schwartz O., Vijayakumar N., Whittle S., Allen N. B. Physiological correlates of emotional reactivity and regulation in early adolescents. Biological Psychology, 2017, vol. 127, pp. 229–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.07.018
  22. Nelemans S. A., Hale W. W., Branje S. J. T., van Lier P. A. C., Koot H. M., Meeus W. H. J. The role of stress reactivity in the long-term persistence of adolescent social anxiety symptoms. Biological Psychology, 2017, vol. 125, pp. 91–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.03.003
  23. Obradovic J., Bush N. R., Stamperdahl J., Adler N. E., Boyce W. T. Biological sensitivity to context: the interactive effects of stress reactivity and family adversity on socioemotional behavior and school readiness. Child Development, 2010, vol. 81 (1), pp. 270–289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01394.x 
  24. Quas J. A., Yim I. S., Oberlander T. F., Nordstokke D., Essex M. J., Armstrong J. M., Bush N., Obradoviж J., Boyce W. T. The symphonic structure of childhood stress reactivity: patterns of sympathetic, parasympathetic, andadrenocortical responses to psychological challenge. Development and Psychopathology, 2014, vol. 26 (4pt1), pp. 963–982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579414000480
  25. Roos L. E., Beauchamp K. G., Giuliano R., Zalewski M., Kim H. K., Fisher P. A. Children's biological responsivity to acute stress predicts concurrent cognitive performance. Stress, 2018, vol.  21 (4), pp. 347–354. URL: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10253890.2018.1458087 
  26. Roos L. E., Giuliano R. J., Beauchamp K. G., Gunnar M., Amidon B., Fisher P. A. Validation of autonomic and endocrine reactivity to a laboratory stressor in young children. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2017, vol. 77, рр. 51–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.11.023
  27. Rozenman M., Sturm A., McCracken J. T., Piacentini J. Autonomic arousal in anxious and typically developing youth during a stressor involving error feedback. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2017, vol. 26 (12), pp. 1423–1432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-017-1001-3
  28. Shapiro D., Jamner L. D., Lane J. D., Light K. C., Myrtek M., Sawada Y., Steptoe A. Blood pressure publication guidelines. Society for psychophysical research. Psychophysiology, 1996, vol. 33 (1), pp. 1–12. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb02103.x 
  29. Shlyk N. I., Sapozhnikova E. N., Kirillova T. G., Semenov V. G. Typoloagical characteristics of the functional state of regulatory systems in schoolchildren and young athletes (According to heart rate variability data). Human Physiology, 2009, vol. 35 (6), pp. 730–738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119709060103  
  30. Sothmann M. S., Buckworth J., Claytor R. P., Cox R. H., White-Welkley J. E., Dishman R. K. Exercise training and the cross-stressor adaptation hypothesis. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 1996, vol. 24 (1), pp. 267–288. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1249/00003677-199600240-00011
  31. Trimmel M., Goger C., Spitzer U., Geiss-Granadia T. Brain DC Potentials Evoked by Listening to Mozart’s Sonata K. 448, Albinoni’s adagio, Schubert’s fantasia, and brown noise: Indications of a Mozart effect independent of mood and arousal. Journal of Psychology and Brain Studies, 2017, vol. 1 (1:2), pp. 1–7. DOI: https://www.imedpub.com/articles/review-article.pdf
  32. Winiarski D. A., Engel M. L., Karnik N. S., Brennan P. A. Early life stress and childhood aggression: Mediating and moderating effects of child callousness and stress reactivity. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 2018, vol. 49 (5), pp. 730–739. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-018-0785-9 
  33. Winzeler K., Voellmin A., Hug E., Kirmse U., Helmig S., Princip M., Cajochen C., Bader K., Wilhelm F. H. Adverse childhood experiences and autonomic regulation in response to acute stress: The role of the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems. Anxiety Stress Coping, 2017, vol. 30 (2), рр. 145–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2016.1238076 
  34. Zarakovsky G. M. The objective function of human adaptation: Developing the ideas of Vsevolod I. Medvedev. Human Physiology, 2014, vol. 40 (6), pp. 589–596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119714060139
Date of the publication 30.06.2020