The status of the history of philosophy in the humanitarian field and the university system: The perspective of self-consciousness
Introduction. The paper studies the current status of the history of philosophy in the humanitarian field and the university system. The purpose of the research is to identify the status of the history of philosophy in the general humanitarian field and the university system in the context of self-consciousness of philosophy historians.
Materials and Methods. The paper implements a perspectivist approach, exploring the problem from the position of a science actor in the dimension of historians of philosophy. The principles of textual analysis, hermeneutical methods, and modeling are used. The research data include the historical and philosophical works, published in the Russian language over the past fifteen years.
Results. The study substantiates the author’s approach to studying the status of the history of philosophy in the perspective of historiography and the self-consciousness of historians of philosophy. The features of modern reflection by historians of the philosophy of their own discipline are summarized. The interdisciplinary status of the history of philosophy in the Humanities and higher education is demonstrated. The author suggests a model of relationships between the history of philosophy and other humanities, which can be used in developing university-level educational programs.
Conclusionss. The productivity of studying the history of philosophy in the perspective of historiography and self-consciousness of historians of philosophy is substantiated. Within the framework of the proposed author’s model, the ways of its contextualization as a field with an interdisciplinary status in the Humanities and higher education are identified.
History of philosophy; Philosophical historiography; Historian of philosophy; Perspectivist approach; Self-consciousness; Methodology; Interdisciplinarity; Humanities; Higher education.
URL WoS/RSCI: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:39256956
Prominence Percentile SciVal: 78.731 Hayden White | Philosophy of History | Historical Representation
https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85074642443&origin=...
- Makkreel R. A. Traditional historicism, contemporary interpretations of historicity, and the history of philosophy. New Literary History, 1990, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 977‒991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/469195
- Normore C. G. What is to be done in the history of philosophy. Topoi, 2006, vol. 25, issue 1-2, pp. 75–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-006-0012-3
- Passmore J. The idea of a history of philosophy. History and Theory, 1965, vol. 5, beiheft 5, pp. 1–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2504117
- Kelly D. R. What is happening to the history of ideas? Journal of the History of Ideas, 1990, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 3‒25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2709744
- Mandelbaum M. The history of ideas, intellectual history and the history of philosophy. History and Theory, 1965, vol. 5, beiheft 5, pp. 33‒66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2504118
- Mash R. How important for philosophers is the history of philosophy? History and Theory, 1987, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 287‒299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2505064
- Popkin R. H. Philosophy and the history of philosophy. Journal of Philosophy, 1985, vol. 82, issue 11, pp. 625‒632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2026418
- Schneider U. J. Intellectual history and the history of philosophy. Intellectual News, 1996, vol. 1, issue 1, pp. 28‒30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15615324.1996.10432168
- Desmons O. Vincent Citot, dir., Problèmes épistémologiques en histoire de la philosophie, Montréal, Liber, 2017, 398 pages. Philosophiques, 2018, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 321–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1048634ar
- Schmidt-Biggemann W. Geschichtsphilosophie und philosophiegeschichte: einsichten und paradoxien. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 2018, vol. 66, issue 1, pp. 2–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/dzph-2018-0002
- Hatton S. Intellectual history and the history of philosophy. History of European Ideas, 2014, vol. 40, issue 7, pp. 925‒937. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2014.882054
- Erlenbusch-Anderson V. Philosophical practice following Foucault. Foucault Studies, 2018, no. 25, pp. 55–83. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22439/fs.v25i2.5574
- Ribeiro H. J. Richard Rorty's philosophy of history and historiography: Hermeneutical questions. Revista de Historia das Ideias, 2016, vol. 34, pp. 35–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-8925_34_2
- Baring E. Ideas on the move: Context in transnational intellectual history. Journal of the History of Ideas, 2016, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 567–587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2016.0031
- Bianco G. The misadventures of the “problem” in “philosophy”: from Kant to Deleuze. Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 2018, vol. 23, issue 2, pp. 8–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2018.1451459
- Mitralexis S. Parallel, additional or alternative histories of philosophy? Questions on the theory and methodology of the history of philosophy. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 2018, vol. 26, issue 6, pp. 1222–1233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2018.1458281
- Beaney M. Twenty-five years of the British journal for the history of philosophy. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 2018, vol. 26, issue 1, pp. 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2018.1423735
- Karafyllis N. C. Philosophy needs history of science needs history of philosophy. Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte, 2018, vol. 41, issue 4, pp. 379–382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bewi.201801919
- Rescher N. The fragmentation of contemporary philosophy using the example of the history of philosophy. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 2018, vol. 66, issue 6, pp. 747–763. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/dzph-2018-0054
- Vlasova O. A. “The revolution of relativity” and self-consciousness in the history of philosophy of the 20th century. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences, 2018, no. 11, pp. 114–125. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36674432
- Vlasova O. A. The possibility of self-consciousness: historians of philosophy in modern Russia. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2017, no. 7 (403), pp. 88‒94. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29958042
- Shchedrina T. G. Archive of the era: problem and concept. Culturology, 2009, no. 1, pp. 104‒111. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=11909511
- Vdovina I. S. Paul Ricoeur: A History of philosophy as self-understanding of philosophy. History of Philosophy, 2012, no. 17, pp. 45‒62. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18955918
- Dyakov A. V. The postmodern history of philosophy: Pro et contra. Philosophy Issues, 2016, no. 6, pp. 176‒184. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26421768
- Yulina N. S. Philosophical thought in the USA. XX century. Monograph. Moscow, Kanon+ Publ., 2010, 599 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20062660