Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 23–35

Organizing educational process in higher school on basis of requirements to teacher in polycultural environment [In English]

Mardakhaev L. V. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation), Egorychev A. M. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation), Mallaev D. M. 2 (Makhachkala, Russian Federation), Varlamova E. Y. 3 (Cheboksary, Russian Federation), Kostina E. A. 4 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
1 Russian State Social University
2 Dagestan State Pedagogical University
3 Chuvash State Pedagogical University
4 Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University

Introduction. The article is devoted to the problem of organizing and carrying out the educational process according to the key points in linguistic culturology. The purpose of the article is definition of the features of the educational process, organized in accordance with the requirements for the teacher in polycultural environment. The research is aimed at analysis of the cultural content and reveal of socio-cultural requirements for the teacher. The analytical findings have been used as the basis to highlight the features of the educational process, targeted at preparation of a future teacher, who is considered as a representative of the own nationality, for implementing the professional activity in the polycultural society.
Materials and Methods. The research has employed theoretical analysis of studies, which describe the basic ways to carry out the process of educating the rising generation in accordance with the linguo-cultural factor. Generalization of the cultural experience, accumulated in polycultural society, has contributed to analysis of the requirements for professional and personal preparation of future teachers.
Results. The authors have revealed and described the socio-cultural requirements of the Russian and foreign cultures, considered as the complex of components of the integrated world cultural and educational area; at the same time the fact that each culture has its unique features, has been admitted and taken into account. The authors also have highlighted the features of the educational process in a higher school to achieve the purpose of making a future teacher prepared for self-realization in polycultural society; they have described the courses of educational process, organized in a higher school and based on consideration of a teacher as a person, who represents the own nationality and the accumulated national socio-cultural experience.
Conclusions. The authors come to the conclusion that certain cultural requirements for developed personal and professional features of a teacher have emerged. These features show some similarities and differences in the cultural contexts, due to the unique specificity of each culture. Educational process, organized due to the socio-cultural requirements for a teacher, implies modeling the educational activity in accordance with these requirements and contributing to saving, developing of the personal socio-cultural position of a teacher as a representative of the nation (own people). The authors have compiled the specifics to organize the educational process, based on the cultural requirements for a teacher.


Professional training of teachers; Culture; Linguistic culture; Methodical preparation; Image of teacher; Ethnocultural image of teacher; Socio-cultural position of teacher; Ethnic identity

For citation:
Mardakhaev L. V., Egorychev A. M., Mallaev D. M., Varlamova E. Y., Kostina E. A. Organizing educational process in higher school on basis of requirements to teacher in polycultural environment [In English]. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 23–35. DOI:
  1. Arnon S., Reichel N. Who is the ideal teacher? Am I? Similarity and difference in perception of students of education regarding the qualities of a good teacher and of their own qualities as teachers. Teachers and Teaching:Theory and Practice, 2007, vol. 13, issue 5, pp. 441–464. DOI:
  2. Britzman D.P. Cultural myths in the making of a teacher: Biography and social structure in teacher education. Harvard Educational Review, 1986, vol. 56 (4), pp. 442–456. DOI:  
  3. Chang-Kredl S., Colannino D. Constructing the image of the teacher on Reddit: Best and worst teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2017, vol. 64, pp. 43–51. DOI:
  4. Ertmer P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich A. T. Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 2010, vol. 42, issue 3, pp. 255–284. DOI:
  5. Gumperz J. J., Cook-Gumperz J. Studying language, culture, and society: Sociolinguistics or linguistic anthropology? Journal of Sociolinguistics, 2008, vol. 12, issue 4, pp. 532–545. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00378.x
  6. Hammer M. R., Bennett M. J., Wiseman R. Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The intercultural development inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2003, vol. 27, issue 4, pp. 421–443. DOI: 10.1016/S0147-1767(03)00032-4
  7. Hinner M. B. Intercultural misunderstandings: Causes and solutions. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 2017, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 885–909. DOI:
  8. Imai M., Kanero J., Masuda T. The relation between language, culture, and thought. Current Opinion in Psychology, 2016, vol. 8, pp. 70–77. DOI:
  9. Koester J., Lustig M. W. Intercultural communication competence: Theory, measurement, and application. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2015, vol. 48, pp. 20–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.03.006
  10. Liu J., Fang F. (Gabriel). Perceptions, awareness and perceived effects of home culture on intercultural communication: Perspectives of university students in China. System, 2017, vol. 67, pp. 25–37. DOI:
  11. Louie N. L. Culture and ideology in mathematics teacher noticing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2018, vol. 97, issue 1, pp. 55–69. DOI:
  12. Mardakhaev L. V., Egorychev A. M., Varlamova E. Y., Kostina E. A. Development of linguo-cultural personality of future teachers within the educational environment of higher educational institutions. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, vol. 8 (4), pp. 204–216. DOI:
  13. Piątkowska K. From cultural knowledge to intercultural communicative competence: Changing perspectives on the role of culture in foreign language teaching. Intercultural Education, 2015, vol. 26, issue 5, pp. 397–408. DOI:
  14. Shemshadsara Z. G. Developing cultural awareness in foreign language teaching. English Language Teaching, 2012, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 95–99. DOI:
  15. Sommer T. Culture in Foreign Language Teaching. Canadian Modern Language Review, 1974, vol. 30, issue 4, pp. 342–346. DOI:
  16. Steen-Utheim A., Wittek A. L. Dialogic feedback and potentialities for student learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2017, vol. 15, pp. 18–30. DOI:
  17. Thompson B., Kirby S., Smith K. Culture shapes the evolution of cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016, vol. 113, issue 16, pp. 4530–4535. DOI:
  18. Tintiangco-Cubales A., Kohli R., Sacramento J., Henning N., Agarwal-Rangnath R., Sleeter C. Toward an ethnic studies pedagogy: Implications for K-12 schools from the research. Urban Review, 2015, vol. 47, issue 1, pp. 104–125. DOI:
  19. Mardahaev L. V. Formation of the foundations of the future officer humanitarian culture. Humanitarian Problems of Military Science, 2014, no. 1, pp. 197–200. (In Russian) URL:
Date of the publication 30.04.2019