Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 151–168
© Pisareva S. A., Puchkov M. Y., Rivkina S. V., Tryapitsina A. P., 2019
UDC: 
37.082 + 37.086 + 37.087

Teachers’ professional competence: The model of level-based assessment

Pisareva S. A. 1 (St.Petersburg, Russian Federation), Puchkov M. Y. 1 (St.Petersburg, Russian Federation), Rivkina S. V. 1 (St.Petersburg, Russian Federation), Tryapitsina A. P. 1 (St.Petersburg, Russian Federation)
1 Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 5081
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article is devoted to the problem of assessing teachers’ professional competence, which allows to take into account complexity and variability of teaching. The purpose of the research is to present and justify the competence-based model of teachers’ professional evaluation, which is an alternative to the existing model of teachers' certification. The presented competence-based model allows to take into account the essential characteristics of modern teaching, to focus on supporting teachers’ motivation to self-improvement and removing barriers which prevent an adequate attitude to external evaluation.
Materials and Methods. The study was conducted within the framework of the activity-based approach, which allowed to analyze teachers’ professional practice as the unity of value-motivational, substantive and procedural components. Applying the activity-based approach led to the consideration of teaching as an activity which is aimed at solving professional tasks. The tools for the assessment of teachers’ professional competence include diagnostic work and the criterion scale of lesson evaluation. 2300 Russian language teachers and 2295 mathematics teachers from 13 regions of the Russian Federation, and 197 experts took part in the model approbation.
Results. The authors clarified the concept of ‘teacher’s professional competence’, described the system-forming function of the educational component within the structure of teacher’s professional competence, justified the usage of professional tasks hierarchy for assessing teachers’ professional competence. The study revealed the conditions for the phased evaluation of teachers’ professional competence.
Conclusions. The authors present an interpretation of the research results, identify the risks of the approbation and teachers’ difficulties and emphasize the need for assisting teachers in developing a new professional function which is promoting students’ education.

Keywords: 

Level-based assessment; Model of level-based assessment; Level of competence; Teacher’s professional competence; Professional task.

URL WoS/RSCI: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:38538213

Prominence Percentile SciVal: 94.487 Classroom Management | Self-Efficacy | Pre-service Teachers

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85071420395&origin=...

Teachers' professional competence: The model of level-based assessment

For citation:
Pisareva S. A., Puchkov M. Y., Rivkina S. V., Tryapitsina A. P. Teachers’ professional competence: The model of level-based assessment. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 151–168. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1903.09
References: 
  1. De Boer E., Janssen F. J. J. M., van Driel J. H. Using an attribution support tool to enhance the teacher efficacy of student science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2016, vol. 27, issue 3, pp. 303–324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9461-8  
  2. Donovan M. K., Cannon S. O. The university supervisor, edTPA, and the new making of the teacher. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 2018, vol. 26, no. 28. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.26.2849
  3. Cappannini O. M., Espíndola O. R. Obstacles in diagnostic assessment. A proposal for overcoming them by identifying models presented in the course. EducacionQuimica, 2012, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 484–491. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0187-893X(17)30137-4
  4. Huber S. G., Skedsmo G. Teacher evaluation–accountability and impro ving teaching practices. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 2016, vol. 28, issue 2, pp. 105–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-016-9241-1  
  5. Matthews P. H. N. Chomsky aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1965. Pp. x + 251. Journal of Linguistics, 1967, vol. 3, issue 1, pp. 119–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700012998  
  6. Skaalvik E. M., Skaalvik S. Motivated for teaching? Associations with school goal structure, teacher self-efficacy, job satisfaction and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2017, vol. 67, pp. 152–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.006  
  7. Kusumawardhani P. N. Does teacher certification program lead to better quality teachers? Evidence from Indonesia. Education Economics, 2017, vol. 25, issue 6, pp. 590–618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2017.1329405
  8. Meuwissen K. W., Choppin J. M. Preservice teachers’ adaptations to tensions associated with the edTPA during its early implementation in New York and Washington states. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 2015, vol. 23, no. 103. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.2078  
  9. Mohamadi Z., Malekshahi N. Designing and validating a potential formative evaluation inventory for teacher competences. Language Testing in Asia, 2018, vol. 8, pp. 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-018-0059-2
  10. Skaalvik E. M., Skaalvik S. Still motivated to teach? A study of school context variables, stress and job satisfaction among teachers in senior high school. Social Psychology of Education, 2017, vol. 20, issue 1, pp. 15–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-016-9363-9.
  11. Uriegas B., Kupczynski L., Mundy M.-A. A comparison of traditional and alternative certification routes on classroom management. SAGE Open, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014553599
  12. Zee M., Koomen H. M. Y. Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 2016, vol. 86, issue 4, pp. 981–1015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801  
  13. Boguslavsky M. V. Advanced training centers in the network of federal experimental sites (paradigm, trends, effective model and new activities). Monograph. Moscow, Institute of Educational Policy "Eureka" Publ., 2001, 22 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=2119974
  14. Verbitsky A. A., Kalashnikov V. G. Category “context” in psychology and pedagogy. Monograph. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2010, 300 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20243415
  15. Vereshchagina N. O., Smooth I. V., Glubokova E. N., Pisareva S. A., Solomin V. P., Tryapitsyna A. P. Developing the Competence of the Future Teacher in the Educational Process of a Modern University. Monograph. St. Petersburg, Russian State Pedagogical University A. I. Herzen Publ., 2016, 207 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27419331
  16. Kalyar M. N., Ahmad B., Kalyar H. Does teacher motivation lead to student motivation? The Mediating role of teaching behavior. Educational Studies Moscow, 2018, no. 3, pp. 91–119. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2018-3-91-119  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35618158
  17. Klimenko L. V., Posukhova O. Yu. School teachers' professional identity in the context of the precariatization of social and labor relations in large Russian cities. Educational Studies Moscow, 2018, no. 3, pp. 36–67. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2018-3-36-67  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35618156
  18. Lenskaya E. A. The quality of education and quality of training of teachers. Questions of Education, 2008, no. 4, pp. 81-96. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=11714769
  19. Sergienko A. Yu. Teacher education management in Singapore. Education Management: Theory and Practice, 2018, no. 1, pp. 23–35. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=34973086
  20. Smoleusova T. V. Methodical readiness of teachers to introduce innovations in the classroom, the relevant requirements of the federal state educational standard. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2015, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 27–36. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1504.03  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23917472
  21. Temnyatkina O. V., Tokmeninova D. V. Modern approaches to teacher performance assessment an overview of foreign publications. Educational Studies Moscow, 2018, no. 3, pp. 180–195. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35618161
Date of the publication 30.06.2019