Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 169–184
© Mikidenko N. L., Storozheva S. P., Kharlamov A. V., 2019
UDC: 
378.01+316.74

The competence-based model of higher engineering education: Features of implementation in the modern labor market

Mikidenko N. L. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation), Storozheva S. P. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation), Kharlamov A. V. 2 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
1 Siberian State University of Telecommunications and Informatics
2 Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Russian Federation
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 8358
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article examines engineering graduates’ knowledge, skills and personal qualities demanded by innovative branches of the economy. The purpose of the study is to identify the features of higher engineering education competence-based model within the modern labor market.
Materials and Methods. The study is based on the theory of competence-based approach in higher education. The competence-based approach is considered as a basis for the harmonization of educational and professional standards in the aspect of formed competencies. Competences are understood as fulfilling abilities to solve professional tasks effectively within a specific professional field. Students’ attitude to the issues of demand for competencies in the labor market and priorities in the competences formed during their studies at the university were identified on the basis of a survey conducted with undergraduate students of a regional branch university. When interpreting the results, methods of description, comparison, classification and semantic interpretation of data were used.
Results. A survey of undergraduate students studying telecommunications was conducted, students' self-assessment their professional competencies and readiness for professional practice were identified, students' opinions on the basic competencies of the engineer were revealed. Students' opinions were compared with the views of employers on the basis of national and regional studies. It is shown that identifying the opinions of undergraduate students allows us to review and adjust their educational strategies which promote employment and career improvements, form a loyal attitude to the need for lifelong education and increase qualifications and successful professional self-realization. Professional motivation, taking into account the competencies demanded by the labor market, and positive attitudes towards the chosen career make it possible to overcome unfavorable contexts of the labor market and create conditions for successful professional socialization with regard to the requirements of innovativeness and social responsibility.
Conclusions. The authors summarize the features of competence-based model of higher engineering education in the modern labor market.

Keywords: 

Engineering education; Students; Competence-based approach; Professional competence; Competence of engineering education; Labor market; Employer; Communications and telecommunications industry.

URL WoS/RSCI: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:38538214

Prominence Percentile SciVal: 99.370 Pedagogical Support | Educational Process | Professional Competence

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85071442698&origin=...

The competence-based model of higher engineering education: Features of implementation in the modern labor market

For citation:
Mikidenko N. L., Storozheva S. P., Kharlamov A. V. The competence-based model of higher engineering education: Features of implementation in the modern labor market. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 169–184. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1903.10
References: 
  1. Artemeva V. A., Veselova E. K., Dvoretskaya M. Ya., Korzhova E. Yu. Social responsibility and personal innovativeness of working and non-working students. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 73–90. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1805.05 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36433779
  2. Vishnevsky Yu. R., Boronina L. N., Bannikova L. N. Engineering education and reproduction of engineering personnel: Practice and actual problems. Engineering Education, 2017, no. 21, pp. 18–24. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29988086
  3. Bannikova L. N., Boronina L. N., Vishnevsky Y. R. Implementation of the new models of preparation of research engineers: A sociological analysis. Higher Education in Russia, 2016, no. 11, pp. 88–96. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27330105 
  4. Bondareva I. B. Particularities of engineering work. Ivanovo State University Bulletin. Series Economics, 2016, no. 1, pp. 18–23. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25895339
  5. Boronina L. N., Bannikova L. N., Balyasov A. A. Peculiarities and contradictions in formation of professional potential of future engineers in the context of innovative development of the regional economy. Quality. Innovation. Education, 2018, no. 5, pp. 20–25. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36498596
  6. Brusakova I. A. Professional competences innovation engineer. Modern Education: Content, Technology, Quality, 2016, vol. 1, pp. 84–87. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26530177
  7. Burganova N. T. Professional competence of an engineer. Socio-Economic and Technical Systems: Research, Design, Optimization, 2016, no. 3, pp. 42–48. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26687631
  8. Vishnevskiy Y. R., Narkhov D. Yu., Didkovskaya Y. V. Trends in higher vocational education: Professionalization or deprofessionalization? Education and Science, 2018, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 152–170. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32361920
  9. Klucharev G. A., Dezhina I. G. Russian Education for Innovative Economy: “The Pressure Points”. Sociological Studies, 2018, no. 9, pp. 40–48. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31857/S013216250001957-5  (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36367657
  10. Zotov V. V. Competences and professionally important qualities: The correlation of notions and the field of applicability in education, professional environment and state service. Tambov University Review. Series Social Sciences, 2017, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 28–33. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29273645
  11. Kislov A. G. From advance to trans-professional education. Education and Science, 2018, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 54–74. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32361915
  12. Markeeva A. V. Social consequences of the development of the Internet of Things (IOT). Modern Information Technologies and IT education, 2016, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 236–240. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28151046
  13. Myagkov A. Yu. Technical university students: Professional competences and expectations on the labour market. Sociological Studies, 2016, no. 6, pp. 102–109. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26187035
  14. Palyanov A. A., Rimskaya O. N. New engineer competencies for the space industry. Professional Education in Russia and Abroad, 2016, no. 1, pp. 55–61. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28436627
  15. Rudskoy A. I., Borovkov A. I., Romanov P. I., Kolosova O. V. General professional competence of a modern russian engineer. Higher Education in Russia, 2018, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 5–18. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32481785
  16. Yushko S. V., Galikhanov M. F., Kondratyev V. V. Integrative training of future engineers to innovative activities in conditions of postindustrial economy. Higher Education in Russia, 2019, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 65–75. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36826099
  17. Aginako-Arri Z., Garmendia-Mujika M., Bezanilla-Albisua M. J., Solaberrieta-Mendez E. Professional skills development in engineering education at the university of the Basque country: problem or project based on learning?. DYNA, 2019, vol. 94, pp. 22–25. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6036/8720
  18. Becker G. S. Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 1962, vol. 70, no. 5, part 2, pp. 9–49. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/258724
  19. Borrego M., Douglas E. P., Amelink C. T. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research methods in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 2009, vol. 98, issue 1, pp. 53–66. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01005.x
  20. Božić M., Čizmić S., Šumarac-Pavlović A., Escalas-Tramullas M. T. Problem-based learning in telecommunications: internship-like course bridging the gap between the classroom and industry. International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Education, 2014, vol. 51, issue 2, pp. 110–120. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7227/IJEEE.51.2.3
  21. Felgueiras M.C., Rocha J.S., Caetano N. Engineering education towards sustainability. Energy Procedia, 2017, vol. 136, pp. 414-417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.266
  22. Laar E. van, Deursen A. J. A. M. van, Dijk J. A. G. M. van, Haan J. de. 21st-century digital skills instrument aimed at working professionals: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Telematics and Informatics, 2018, vol. 35, Issue 8, pp. 2184-2200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.08.006
  23. Nyemba W.R., Carter K.F., Mbohwa Ch., Chinguwa S. A systems thinking approach to collaborations for capacity building and sustainability in engineering education. Procedia Manufacturing, 2019, vol. 33, pp. 732-739. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.04.092
  24. Pei-Li Yu, Shih-Chieh Fang, Yu-Lin Wang. Improving IT professionals job skills development: The use of management styles and individual cultural value orientation. Asia Pacific Management Review, 2016, vol. 21, issue 2, pp. 63-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2015.07.002
  25. Prince M. J., Felder R. M. Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 2006, vol. 95, issue 2, pp. 123–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x
  26. Rampasso I. S., Anholon R., Silva D., Cooper Ordoñez R. E., Santa-Eulália L. A. An analysis of the difficulties associated to sustainability insertion in engineering education: Examples from HEIs in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, vol. 193, pp. 363-371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.079
  27. Tejedor G., Segalàs J., Rosas-Casals M. Transdisciplinarity in higher education for sustainability: How discourses are approached in engineering education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, vol. 175, pp. 29-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.085
  28. Warnock J. N., Mohammadi-Aragh M. J. Case study: use of problem-based learning to develop students' technical and professional skills. European Journal of Engineering Education, 2016, vol. 41, issue 2, pp. 142–153. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2015.1040739 
Date of the publication 30.06.2019