Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 185–199
UDC: 
378

Flipped classroom technology in engineering education: Criteria of educational innovation

Kochetkov M. V. 1 (Moscow; Sayanogorsk, Russian Federation), Noskov M. F. 2 (Sayanogorsk, Russian Federation)
1 Moscow Pedagogical State University; Sayano-Shushensky Branch of Siberian Federal University
2 Sayano-Shushensky Branch of Siberian Federal University
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article focuses on a significant problem of developing education according to current innovative trends and challenges. The purpose of the research is to identify the criteria of educational innovation.
Materials and Methods. The research methodology is based on the socio-cultural approach, which considers education as a leading, predictive institution of social development, due to the consistency of the definition of “innovation” with its semantic highlights characteristic for conceptual national documents.
Results. In the context of global socio-cultural trends, the most general definition of “innovation” is explicated – as something new and effective in the context of preserving and developing anthropological potential. For the field of education, it is proposed to focus on a narrower understanding of innovation – in accordance with the social and technological tasks which appear in the conceptual national documents of the Russian Federation. Two more criteria are efficiency and essential novelty of educational innovation. To illustrate the theoretical findings based on the authors’ “non-traditional” approach to learning (in the Western version the closest is the ‘Flipped Classroom’ technology) the characteristic features of innovative learning are revealed.
Conclusions. The criteria of educational innovation in the context of Russian innovation-oriented socio-cultural reality are identified. They include methodological novelty, educational efficiency and compliance with the tasks of technological “breakthrough” of Russian Society. In terms of global trends in understanding the category of ‘innovation’ in Russian educational research investigations it is recommended to use such terms as “novelty” and “creation”.

Keywords: 

Flipped classroom; Inverted classroom; Non-traditional approach to learning; Practical training session; Blended learning; Innovation; Creativity

For citation:
Kochetkov M. V., Noskov M. F. Flipped classroom technology in engineering education: Criteria of educational innovation. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 185–199. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1903.11
References: 
  1. Zeer E. F., Novoselov S. A., Cimanuk E. E. Institutional approach to innovation in education. Innovations in Education, 2010, no. 1, pp. 52-64. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=12996488
  2. Zeer E. F., Novoselov S. A., Cimanuk E. E. Innovations as a form of integration of pedagogical science and educational practice. Pedagogical education in Russia, 2011, no. 2, pp. 155-163. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=16441681
  3. Domracheva S. A. On the issue of pedagogical innovations and pedagogical innovations. Bulletin of the Mari State University, 2011, no. 6, pp. 97-100. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20340040
  4. Voeykova O. B., Lyachin V. I.  Categorical definition of innovative space. Vestnik of SibGAU, 2015, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1014–1021. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25109533
  5. Linton J. Quiet Contributors: The role of the arts, humanities and social sciences in innovation. Foresight and STI Governance, 2018, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 6–12. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2018.3.6.12
  6. Luttenberger S., Macher D., Maidl V., Rominger C., Aydin N., Paechter M. Different patterns of university students' integration of lecture podcasts, learning materials, and lecture attendance in a psychology course. Education and Information Technologies, 2018, vol. 23, issue 1, pp. 165–178. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9592-3
  7. Inzelt A., Csonka L. The approach of the business sector to responsible research and innovation (RRI). Foresight and STI Governance, 2017, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 63–73. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2017.4.63.73  
  8. Havas A. Social and business innovations: Are common measurement approaches possible? Foresight and STI Governance, 2016, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 58–80. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/1995-459X.2016.2.58.80
  9. Zemtsov S., Muradov A., Wade I., Barinova V. Determinants of regional innovation in Russia: Are people or capital more important? Foresight and STI Governance, 2016,– vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 29–42. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/1995-459X.2016.2.29.42
  10. Sukhomlin V. A. Full victory of innovations above the Russian education. The Moscow University Bulletin. Series. Pedagogical Education, 2009, no. 1, pp. 16–39. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=12157592
  11. Nagovitsyn R. S., Zamolotskikh E. G., Rassolova E. A., Farnieva M. G., Oborotova S. A. The use of the innovative synectic method in the educational process of higher educational institutions. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 7–22. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1803.01 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35223272
  12. Asmolov A. G. Modern challenges and perspectives of professional development in the world of education. Educational Panorama, 2016, no. 1, pp. 6–8. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25864138
  13. Darren P. M. C. , Brady-Van den Bos М. Too much, too soon? A critical investigation into factors that make flipped classrooms effective. Higher Education Research and Development, 2018, vol. 37, issue 4, pp. 683–697. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1455642
  14. Tikhonova N. V. The "flipped classroom" method in higher education: Opportunities and problems of implementation. Kazan Pedagogical Journal, 2018, no. 2, pp. 74–79. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32768839
  15. Legan M. V.  Organization and assessment of the quality flipped learning by undergraduates. Quality. Innovation. Education, 2017, no. 3, pp. 9–16. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29457869
  16. Altynikova N. V., Gerasev A. D., Ryapisov N. A., Mayer B. O., Gizhitskaya S. A.  Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University: Rate on innovation. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2013, no. 1, pp. 5–20. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18832050
  17. Schaeffer P. R., Fischer B., Queiroz S. Beyond education: The role of research universities in innovation ecosystems. Foresight and STI Governance, 2018, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 50–61. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2018.2.50.61
  18. Kergroach S. Industry 4.0: New challenges and opportunities for the labour market. Foresight and STI Governance, 2017, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 6–8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2017.4.6.8
  19. Brookhart S. M., Guskey T. R., Bowers A. J., McMillan J. H., Smith J. K., Smith L. F., Stevens  M.  T., Welsh M. E. A Century of grading research: Meaning and value in the most common educational measure. Review of Educational Research, 2016, vol. 86, issue 4, pp. 803–848. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654316672069
  20. Khan R. How frugal innovation promotes social sustainability. Sustainability, 2016, vol. 8, issue 10, pp. 1034. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su8101034
  21. Latuha O. A. Training leaders of organizations in sustainable development management. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 225–236. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1803.16 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35223290
  22. Melnikova O. Y., Zhigadlo A. P.  Ecological competence of bachelors of socio-economic profile in the context of the education principles for sustainable development. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 139–153. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1803.10 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35223284
  23. Anra Y., Yamin M. Relationships between lecturer performance, organizational culture, leadership, and achievement motivation. Foresight and STI Governance, 2017, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 92–97. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2017.2.92.97
  24. Eghbal F., Hoveida R., Seyadat S. S., Samavatyan H., Yarmohammadian M. H. The effect of talent management process on the research performance of faculty members with the mediating role of organizational justice. Foresight and STI Governance, 2017, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 83–91. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2017.2.83.91
  25. Kochetkov M. V. Theoretical and methodological foundations and organizational and pedagogical conditions for the development of the creative personality of the teacher and student. Monograph. Moscow, RAE Publ., 2004, 264 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19911408
  26. Kochetkov M. V. Holistic professional self-development of a teacher in co-creative educational activities. Monograph. Krasnoyarsk, Siberian State Technological University Publ., 2013, 289 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24061459
  27. Antonova N. L., Merenkov A. V. Flipped learning in higher education: Problems and contradictions. Integration of Education, 2018, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 237–247. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.091.022.201802.237-247 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35161764
  28. McLaughlin J. E., Roth M. T., Glatt D. M., Gharkholonarehe N., Davidson C. A., Griffin L. M., Esserman D. A., Mumper R. J. The flipped classroom: A course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Academic Medicine, 2014, vol. 89, issue 2, pp. 236–243. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000086
  29. Zupon K. Flipped classrooms and student achievement. Culminating Projects in Information Media, 2017, vol. 13. URL: http://repository.stcloudstate.edu/im_etds/13
Date of the publication 30.06.2019