Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 37–51
© Bogdan S. S., Lashkova L. L., Lukiyanchina E. V., 2019
UDC: 
165+159.955

Nurturing the development of critical thinking based on universal cognitive attitudes, strategies and techniques

Bogdan S. S. 1 (Surgut, Russian Federation), Lashkova L. L. 1 (Surgut, Russian Federation), Lukiyanchina E. V. 1 (Surgut, Russian Federation)
1 Surgut State Pedagogical University
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 4999
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article investigates the problem of identifying universal cognitive attitudes and strategies of critical thinking in modern education. The aim of the research is to reveal the characteristic features of nurturing critical thinking based on universal cognitive attitudes, strategies and techniques.
Materials and Methods. The article is based on works by D.Halpern, V.R.Rudgero and D.Levitin devoted to the development of basis of critical thinking. The research methodology includes general scientific method and comparing and reviewing foreign studies on critical thinking.
Results. The authors have revealed the structure and the contents of the conceptual cognitive core of critical thinking, as well as such basic universal cognitive attitudes of critical thinking as conative and ethical ones. They include independence, mental flexibility and courage, observation and insistence, readiness for self-knowledge, meta cognition and planning, and confidence in the power of the mind. The authors summarize and classify the main skills of cognitive and logic techniques and strategies in critical thinking. The defined conceptual core of critical thinking includes universal cognitive attitudes and strategies which serve as emotional, intellectual and instrumental constituents for the development of effective techniques in fostering critical thinking within modern education.
Conclusions. In conclusion the authors summarize the characteristic features of nurturing critical thinking based on universal cognitive attitudes, strategies and techniques.

Keywords: 

Critical thinking; Cognitive attitudes and strategies; Skepticism; False information; Modern education; Information society.

URL WoS/RSCI: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:38191463

Prominence Percentile SciVal: 79.030 Critical Thinking | Gelassenheit | Informal Fallacies

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85065990279&origin=...

Nurturing the development of critical thinking based on universal cognitive attitudes, strategies and techniques

For citation:
Bogdan S. S., Lashkova L. L., Lukiyanchina E. V. Nurturing the development of critical thinking based on universal cognitive attitudes, strategies and techniques. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 37–51. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1902.03
References: 
  1. Beloborodova N. S., Melnikova N. A. Debate as a form of development of the critical thinking of college students. World of Science, Culture and Education, 2016, no. 6, pp. 73–75. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27652278
  2. Volkov E. N. Learning scientific (critical) thinking skills and visual objectivization of knowledge: Content, practices, tools. Bulletin of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod. Series: Social Sciences, 2016, no. 2, pp. 199–203. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26815797
  3. Gor'kov I. A. Critical thinking and philosophical education in contemporary society. Prepodavatel XXI vek, 2015, no. 2-1, pp. 41–47. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23803881
  4. Dzhioeva A. R. About didactic aspect of critical thinking development technology. World of Science, Culture and Education, 2015, no. 4, pp. 126–128. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24107654
  5. Sayfudinova A. V., Pushkina V. P. Critical thinking as perspective technology of training. Modern Education: Contents, Technologies, Quality, 2016, vol. 1, pp. 268–270. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26530254
  6. Tsukerman G. A., Mitina O. V. Critical thinking diagnostics. Voprosy Psychologii, 2015, no. 3, pp.  15–30. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25510936
  7. Abrami P. C., Bernard R. M., Borokhovski E., Waddington D. I., Wade C. A., Persson T. Strategies for teaching students to think critically: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 2015, vol. 85, issue 2, pp. 275–314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314551063
  8. Bolger D. J., Mackey A. P., Wang M., Grigorenko E. L. The role and sources of individual differences in critical-analytic thinking: a capsule overview. Educational Psychology Review, 2014, vol. 26, issue 4, pp. 495–518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9279-x
  9. Butler H. A. Halpern Critical thinking assessment predicts real-world outcomes of critical thinking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2012, vol. 26, issue 5, pp. 721–729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2851
  10. English A. R. Dialogic teaching and moral learning: self-critique, narrativity, community and ‘Blind Spots’. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 2016, vol. 50, issue 2, pp. 160–176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12198
  11. Ennis R. H. Critical thinking across the curriculum: A vision. Topoi, 2018, vol. 37, issue 1, pp.  165–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4
  12. Forawi S. A. Standard-based science education and critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2016, vol. 20, pp. 52–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.02.005  
  13. Ghanizadeh A. The interplay between reflective thinking, critical thinking, self-monitoring, and academic achievement in higher education. Higher Education, 2017, vol. 74, issue 1, pp. 101–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0031-y
  14. Huber C. R., Kuncel N. R. Does college teach critical thinking? A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 2016, vol. 86, issue 2, pp. 431–468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315605917
  15. Johnson R. H., Hamby B. A meta-level approach to the problem of defining ‘Critical Thinking’. Argumentation, 2015, vol. 29, issue 4, pp. 417–430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9356-4
  16. Lawson T. J., Jordan-Fleming M. K., Bodle J. H. Measuring psychological critical thinking: an update. Teaching of Psychology, 2015, vol. 42, issue 3, pp. 248–253. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628315587624
  17. Lin S. S. Erratum to: Science and non-science undergraduate students’ critical thinking and argumentation performance in reading a science news report. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2016, vol. 14, issue 5, pp. 997–997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9524-2
  18. Mercier H., Boudry M., Paglieri F., Trouche E. Natural-born arguers: Teaching how to make the best of our reasoning abilities. Educational Psychologist,2017, vol. 52, issue 1, pp. 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207537
  19. Noone C., Hogan M. J.  A randomised active-controlled trial to examine the effects of an online mindfulness intervention on executive control, critical thinking and key thinking dispositions in a university student sample. BMC Psychology, 2018, vol. 6, pp. 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-018-0226-3
  20. Novotny N. L., Stapleton S. J., Hardy E. C. Enhancing critical thinking in graduate nursing online asynchronous discussions. Journal of Nursing Education, 2016, vol. 55, issue 9, pp. 514–521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20160816-05
  21. Rapanta C. Teaching as abductive reasoning: The role of argumentation. Informal Logic, 2018, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 293–311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v38i2.4849
  22. Schmaltz R. M., Jansen E., Wenckowski N. Redefining critical thinking: Teaching students to think like scientists. Frontiers in Psychology, 2017, vol. 8, pp. 459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00459
  23. Song X.  ‘Critical thinking’ and pedagogical implications for higher education. East Asia, 2016, vol. 33, issue 1, pp. 25–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-015-9250-6
  24. Tan C. A Confucian conception of critical thinking. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 2017, vol.  51, issue 1, pp. 331–343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12228
  25. Weaver M. G., Samoshin A. V., Lewis R. B., Gainer M. J. Developing students' critical thinking, problem solving, and analysis skills in an inquiry-based synthetic organic laboratory course. Journal of Chemical Education, 2016, vol. 93, issue 5, pp. 847–851. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00678
  26. Zenker F. Introduction: reasoning, argumentation, and critical thinking instruction. Topoi, 2018, vol. 37, issue 1, pp. 91–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9416-x 
Date of the publication 30.04.2019