Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 108–125
© Fedorova G. A., Ragulina M. I., Udalov S. R., Lapchik M. P., 2019
UDC: 
378.147:004

Distant student-teacher interaction based on modern information and communication technologies

Fedorova G. A. 1 (Omsk, Russian Federation), Ragulina M. I. 1 (Omsk, Russian Federation), Udalov S. R. 1 (Omsk, Russian Federation), Lapchik M. P. 2 (Omsk, Russian Federation)
1 Omsk State Pedagogical University
2 Corresponding author, Omsk State Pedagogical University
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 4297
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article addresses the problem of enhancing practice-oriented learning of undergraduate students in the context of purposeful development of additional communicative components of their ICT-competence. The purpose of the study is to reveal the conditions for the development of distant student-teacher interaction based on modern information and communication technologies.
Materials and Methods. Methodological basis for the study is composed of activity, environmental, competence-based approaches to learning. Purposefully organized educational process with the participation of students and teachers is based on the systematic use of network communications. Dynamics of developing ICT-competence of undergraduate students was evaluated by means of pedagogical experiment based on the following methods: tests; assessment of performing problem-solving tasks; questionnaires; identification of the individual level of student`s teaching abilities and creative productivity by means of observation.
Results. The authors revealed special communicative ICT-competencies and corresponding educational outcomes and developed methods of distant creative student-teacher interaction within the framework of implementing educational, methodological and research projects. The research showed that didactic conditions created for practice-oriented learning of undergraduate education students based on distant cooperation with practicing teachers and aimed at mastering and using modern information and communication technologies in real educational process of schools ensure the positive dynamics of developing ICT-competence of prospective teachers. The effectiveness of the proposed approach for the development of special communicative ICT-competencies in future bachelors of education was proved experimentally, as well as their positive motivation to learn about the innovative aspects of modern schools and the nature of teaching profession.
Conclusions. The authors summarize the conditions for the effective development of distant student-teacher interaction on the basis of modern information and communication technologies.

Keywords: 

Bachelor of education; ICT-competence; Virtual creative groups; Distant technologies; Practice-oriented training; Information educational environment; Social partnership.

URL WoS/RSCI: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:38191468

Prominence Percentile SciVal: 98.749 Technology Integration | Pre-service Teachers | IPAD

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85065988363&origin=...

Distant student-teacher interaction based on modern information and communication technologies

For citation:
Fedorova G. A., Ragulina M. I., Udalov S. R., Lapchik M. P. Distant student-teacher interaction based on modern information and communication technologies. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 108–125. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1902.08
References: 
  1. Almerich G., Orellana N., Suárez-Rodríguez J., Díaz-García I. Teachers’ information and communication technology competences: A structural approach. Computers and Education, 2016, vol. 100, pp. 110–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.002
  2. Alt D. Science teachers' conceptions of teaching and learning, ICT efficacy, ICT professional development and ICT practices enacted in their classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2018, vol. 73, pp. 141–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.020
  3. Avidov-Ungar O., Forkosh-Baruch A. Professional identity of teacher educators in the digital era in light of demands of pedagogical innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2018, vol. 73, pp. 183–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.017
  4. Chen X., Breslow L., De Boer J. Analyzing productive learning behaviors for students using immediate corrective feedback in a blended learning environment. Computers and Education, 2018, vol. 117, pp. 59–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.013
  5. Durksen T. L., Klassen R. M., Daniels L. M. Motivation and collaboration: The keys to a developmental framework for teachers’ professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2017, vol. 67, pp. 53–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.011
  6. Golitsyna I. Educational process in electronic information-educational environment. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2017, vol. 237, pp. 939–944. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.132
  7. Hao Y., Lee K. S. Teachers’ concern about integrating Web 2.0 technologies and its relationship with teacher characteristics. Computers in Human Behavior, 2015, vol. 48, pp. 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.028
  8. Lemon N., Wilson A., Oxworth C., Zavros-Orr A., Wood B. Lines of school-university partnership: Perception, sensation and meshwork reshaping of pre-service teachers’ experiences. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 2018, vol. 43 (10), pp. 81–97. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.v43.n10.5
  9. McDonald M., Kazemi E., Kavanagh S. S. Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education: A call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 2013, vol. 64 (5), pp. 378–386. DOI: https://10.1177/0022487113493807
  10. Mtebe J. S., Mbwilo B., Kissaka M. M. Factors influencing teachers’ use of multimedia enhanced content in secondary schools in Tanzania. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2016, vol. 17 (2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i2.2280
  11. Ojeda P. B. A., Aguilar M. F. G., Zeran E. S. Initial teacher training and information and communication technologies at university of Magallanes-Chilean Patagonia. Digital Education Review, 2016, no. 30, pp. 135–146. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1344/der.2016.30.123-134
  12. Powell C. G., Bodur Y. Teachers’ perceptions of an online professional development experience: Implications for a design and implementation framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2019, vol. 77, pp. 19–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.09.004
  13. Prenger R., Poortman C. L., Handelzalts A. Factors influencing teachers’ professional development in networked professional learning communities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2017, vol. 68, pp. 77–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.08.014
  14. Quartz K. H., Weinstein R. S., Kaufman G., Levine H., Mehan H., Pollock M., Priselac J. Z., Worrell F. C. University-partnered new school designs: Fertile ground for research-practice partnerships. Educational Researcher, 2017, vol. 46 (3), pp. 143–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17703947
  15. Tondeur J., Aesaert K., Prestridge S., Consuegra E. A multilevel analysis of what matters in the training of pre-service teacher's ICT competencies. Computers and Education, 2018, vol. 122, pp.  32–42 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.002
  16. Turvey K., Hayler M. Collaboration and personalisation in teacher education; the case of blogging. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2017, vol. 68, pp. 42–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.08.003
  17. Tsai Y., Lin C., Hong J., Tai K. The effects of metacognition on online learning interest and continuance to learn with MOOCs. Computers and Education, 2018, vol. 121, pp. 18–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.011
  18. Xie K., Tosto D., Chen G. S., Vongkulluksn W. V. A systematic review of design and technology components of educational digital resources. Computers and Education, 2018, vol. 127, pp. 90–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.011
  19. Zuiker S. J., AngD. Virtual environments and the ongoing work of becoming a Singapore teacher. The Internet and Higher Education, 2011, vol. 14 (1), pp. 34–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.05.006
  20. Abykenova D. B., Assainova A. Z. Forming master's degree students’ ICT competencies as future researchers and educators: A Kazakhstan case study. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, no. 1, pp. 34–48. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1701.03 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28416055
  21. Atanasian S. L. Features of informatization of educational activity in pedagogical universities. RUDN Journal of Informatization in Education, 2009, no. 2, pp. 5–13. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=12293090
  22. Bolotov V. A. To the questions on the reform of pedagogical education. Psychological Science and Education, 2014, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 32–40. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22413084
  23. Kuznetsov A. A., Suvorova T. N. Training of teachers for development, assessment of quality and application of electronic educational resources. Pedagogy, 2016, no. 1, pp. 94–101. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25654677
  24. Lapchik M. P. ICT Competence of bachelors of education. Computer Science and Education, 2012, no. 2, pp. 29–33. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17760900
  25. Spirina Y. A., Kazimova D. A., Mulikova S. A. Development of university information educational environment as a condition of improving educational-methodical work. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, no. 4, pp. 26–39. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1704.02 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29962680
Date of the publication 30.04.2019