Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 43–56
© Avakyan I. B., Vinogradova G. A., 2019
UDC: 
378:159.9

Factor analysis of developing innovative readiness of academic staff

Avakyan I. B. 1 (Syzran, Russian Federation), Vinogradova G. A. 2 (Tolyatti, Russian Federation)
1 Military Training and Research Center of the Air Force "Air Force Academy. prof. NOT. Zhukovsky and Yu.A. Gagarin "
2 Tolyatti State University
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 8811
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article investigates the phenomenon of innovative readiness of academic staff. The purpose of the research is to identify the factors which affect the development of innovative readiness of academic staff.
Materials and Methods. The research methodology includes a theoretical analysis of recent Russian and international scientific literature on innovative readiness and reviewing psychological and educational studies in the field of innovative educational practices. The investigation is carried out on the basis of empirical methods (tests, questionnaires, observation, interviews) and mathematical and statistical methods of data processing (single-sample λ-Kolmogorov-Smirnov criterion, linear regression method, "principal component method" factor analysis). The sample comprised 2036 academics of 9 higher educational institutions in Russia.
Results. The study revealed factors which contribute to the dynamics of development and changes in the innovative readiness of academic staff: the external factor is the socio-psychological climate of universities, the internal factors are dynamic and static. Secondly, a linear relationship has been revealed between the socio-psychological climate and internal factors of developing innovative readiness of academic staff. Finally, the authors proposed a factor model for the development of innovative readiness of academic staff based on the presented factor analysis.
Conclusions. The authors conclude that the proposed factor model of developing innovative readiness of academic staff should be considered as a priority area of innovative educational practices in order to increase innovativeness and ensure the competitiveness of Russian academic staff.

Keywords: 

Innovative readiness; Socio-psychological climate; Teaching staff; Higher education institution; Communicative abilities; Professional-pedagogical self-development; Achievement motivation

URL WoS/RSCI: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:38165982

Prominence Percentile SciVal: 99.849 Entrepreneurial Intention | Effectuation | Opportunity Recognition

URL SCOPUS: https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85065095464&origin=...

Factor analysis of developing innovative readiness of academic staff

For citation:
Avakyan I. B., Vinogradova G. A. Factor analysis of developing innovative readiness of academic staff. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 43–56. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1901.03
References: 
  1. Rudneva T. I., Solovova N. V. Higher education institution professor new paradigm of higher education, strategies of educational work. Bulletin of Tver State University. Series “Pedagogy and psychology”, 2016, no. 4, pp. 103–109. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28158079
  2. Zagvyazinsky V. I., Strokova T. A. Resistance to innovation: Essence, preventive measures and ways out. Education and Science Journal, 2014, no. 3, pp. 3–21. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21398979 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2014-3-3-21
  3. Avakyan I. B. Assessment of the readiness of the teacher of higher education to the application of innovative technologies. Perm University Herald, 2018, no. 1, pp. 63–78. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32785985 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2018-1-63-78
  4. Prischepa T. A. Peculiarities of training of teachers for innovative activity. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2014, no. 6, pp. 47–52. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21682103
  5. Kozulina A. P. Readiness of Russian Universities’ faculty for training foreign students: evaluation criteria and methods. Internet Journal Naukovedenie, 2014, no. 6, pp. 54. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23455853  DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15862/54PVN614
  6. Podymova L. S. Specifics of innovational receptivity of lecturers of institutes of higher education. Psychological and Pedagogical Journal Gaudeamus, 2015, no. 1, pp. 46–49. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24312330
  7. Miniyarov V. M., Esterle A. E. Factors of professional self-development of school psychologist in course of professional practice. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 2017, vol. 14 (1), pp. 26–37. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28341214 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2017-14-1-26-37  
  8. Zhurkin M. G., Borisova E. V. Typology of higher education institutions from position of innovative activity in professional sphere. Actual Problems of the Humanities and Natural Sciences, 2015, no. 3-2, pp. 90–94. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23215104
  9. Kopytova N. E. Innovative competencies of the university teacher. Psychological and Pedagogical Journal Gaudeamus, 2013, no. 1, pp. 28–33. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20133121  
  10. Sergienko Yu. A., Sunayakina T. Creativity as the basis of innovative teaching activity. Periodic Scientific and Methodological Journal Concept, 2016, no. S3, pp. 81–85. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25279451  
  11. Bicheva I. B., Kitov A. G. About the readiness of teachers to innovative transformations in teaching and professional activities. Internet Journal Naukovedenie, 2014, no. 6, pp. 45. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23455844  DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15862/45PVN614
  12. Prokhorova M. P., Semchenko A. A. Innovative activity of the teacher of higher education institution as factor of quality of pedagogical education. Bulletin of Minin University, 2016, no. 1-1, pp. 26. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25715363
  13. Ivanova N. L., Popova E. P. Professionals and the problem of implementing innovation in university. Educational Studies. Moscow, 2017, no. 1, pp. 184–206. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28879314 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2017-1-184-206
  14. Budnikova S. P. Motivation of professional choice as a component of professional subjectness in teachers. Psychological Science and Education, 2017, vol. 22 (5), pp. 14–22. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30455079 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/pse.2017220502
  15. Margolis A. A., Arzhanykh E. V., Gurkina O. А., Novikova E. M. Teachers’ opinion about implementation of the professional standard: Results of sociological research. Psychological Science and Education, 2016, vol. 21 (2), pp. 22–34. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26376208 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/pse.2016210204  
  16. Panteleeva V. V., Knysheva T. P. Innovational readiness of the personnel questionnaire. Acmeology, 2016, no. 3, pp. 81–86. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27525903  
  17. Weitze C. L. Designing pedagogical innovation for collaborating teacher teams. Journal of Education for Teaching, 2017, vol. 43 (3), pp. 361–373. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2017.1319511
  18. Stupnisky R. H., BrckaLorenz A., Yuhas B., Guay F. Faculty members’ motivation for teaching and best practices: Testing a model based on self-determination theory across institution types. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2018, vol. 53, pp. 15–26. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.01.004
  19. Walder A. M. Pedagogical innovation in Canadian higher education: Professors’ perspectives on its effects on teaching and learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2017, vol. 54, pp. 71–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.11.001
  20. López M. A. R. European higher education area-driven educational innovation. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2017, vol. 237, pp. 1505–1512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.237
  21. Sutanto E. M. The influence of organizational learning capability and organizational creativity on organizational innovation of Universities in East Java, Indonesia. Asia Pacific Management Review, 2017, vol. 22 (3), pp. 128–135. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2016.11.002
  22. Koeslag-Kreunen M. G. M., Van der Klink M. R., Van den Bossche P., Gijselaers W. H. Leadership for team learning: The case of university teacher teams. Higher Education, 2018, vol. 75 (2), pp. 191–207. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0126-0
  23. de la Fuente J., Kauffman D., Díaz-Orueta U., Kauffman Y. Adapting the research development and innovation (RD & I) value chain in psychology to educational psychology area. Frontiers in Psychology, 2018, vol. 9, pp. 1188. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01188
  24. Elrehail H., Emeagwali O. E., Alsaad A., Alzghoul A. The impact of transformational and authentic leadership on innovation in higher education: The contingent role of knowledge sharing. Telematics and Informatics, 2018, vol. 35 (1), pp. 55–67. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.09.018  
  25. Khatri R., Henderson C., Cole R., Froyd J. E., Friedrichsen D., Stanford C. Characteristics of well-propagated teaching innovations in undergraduate STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 2017, vol. 4, pp. 2. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0056-5

 

Date of the publication 28.02.2019