Science for Education Today, 2019, No.1, pp.57-75
UDC: 
159.9

The influence of polymodality of reflection on personality self-organization

Sizikova T. E. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
1 Novosibirsk state pedagogical University
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article studies how reflection influences the self-organization of individuals. The purpose of this research is to reveal the characteristic features of this influence.
Materials and Methods. The article is an analytical literature review on reflection based on post-non-classical principles of self-organization.
Results. The author analyzes recent studies on reflection within the framework of structural, functional, phenomenological, attributive and substrate approaches. The exploratory ontology of reflection is revealed. The article describes such characteristics of integrity in reflection as intentionality as poly-oriented nature of reflection and polymodality of reflection. The author considers self-organization of personality as a result of reflection, which is a triangular network of modalities characterized by intentionality. The results indicate that certain features of personality self-organization depend on the predominance of one of the modalities in reflection. The author, within the framework of triangular relations of modalities, identifies twenty-two strategies of self-organization of individuals.
Conclusions. The article concludes that polymodality of reflection determines the strategies of self-organization of individuals. Twenty-two strategies of personality self-organization are formed within eighteen modalities of reflection on the basis of their multilevel triangular relations.

Keywords: 

Integrity of reflection; Polymodality of reflection; Strategies of personality self-organization; Triangulation network of modalities; Modal strategy

References: 
  1. Belkina V. N., Revyakina I. I. Age dynamics of development of reflection at different stages of pedagogical professionalization. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 2003, no. 1, pp. 120–124 (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18920492
  2. Bocharova E. E. Adaptation readiness of personality to situations of social changes. Izvestiya Saratovskogo Universitrta. (N.S.), Ser. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2015, no. 1, pp. 45–51. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23798405
  3. Glebov V. A. The essence of the cadets professional competences in a military institute. Modern Problems of Science and Education, 2013, no. 5, pp. 170. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20992231
  4. Dudareva V. Yu., Semenov I. N. Phenomenology of refleсtion and its investigation in modern foreign psychology. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2008, no. 1, pp. 101–120. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=11719867
  5. Zinchenko V. P. Trial of thinking about thinking. To the 80 anniversary of V. V. Davydov. (1930–1998). Russian Studies in Philosophy, 2010, no. 11, pp. 75–91. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15263423
  6. Ibatullina G. M. Reflection and principles of genre world-modeling. Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice, 2013, no. 12–1, pp. 92–94. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20684074
  7. Karpov A. V. Reflectiveness as a mental quality and the method to diagnose it. Psychological Journal, 2003, no. 5, pp. 45–57. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=173159917.
  8. Klochko V. E. Self-organization in psychological systems: problems of formation of mental space of the personality. Tomsk: Tomsk State University, 2005. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20087935
  9. Klochko V. E. Modern psychology: A system sense of a paradigm shift. Siberian Journal of Psychology, 2007, no. 26, pp. 15–21. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=12689063
  10. Kozhevnikov N. N., Danilova V. S. Prerequisites and possibilities of formation of the disciplinary ontology in psychology. Bulletin of North-Eastern Federal University, 2013, no. 5, pp. 85–90. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21271409
  11. Lazorak O. V. Humanitarian orientation in the education of students of technical specialties: Existential aspect. Fundamental Research, 2013, no. 10–8, pp. 1801–1805. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20682988
  12. Leontiev D. A., Osin E. N. “Good” and “bad” reflection: From an explanatory model to differential assessment. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2014, no. 4, pp. 110–135. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24899593
  13. Lukianov O. V., Volynets K. V. Initiative and involvement in existential consulting. Analysis of a case. Tomsk State University Journal, 2015, no. 400, pp. 277–281. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25109842
  14. Malanov S. V. Ontology of mental phenomena: Mechanisms of processing of information or indicative research activity? Methodology and History of Psychology, 2006, no. 1, pp. 147–159. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19011628
  15. Rossokhin A. Reflection and internal dialogue in altered States of consciousness: Inter-consciousness in psychoanalysis. M.: Kogito-Center, 2010, 304 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20240194
  16. Sizikova T. E. Meta-model of reflection within the framework of meta-ontology. Siberian Journal of Psychology, 2018, no. 68, pp. 6–31. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36482980
  17. Stipek A. A., Lukyanov O. V. Relational-oriented goals in existential group therapy. Siberian Journal of Psychology, 2017, no. 63, pp. 49–60. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29011184
  18. Stepanov S. Yu., Semenov I. N. Psychology of reflection: Problems and research. Voprosy Psychologii, 1985, no. 3, pp. 31–40. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18916860
  19. Stepin V. S. Self developing systems and post-non-classic rationality. Russian Studies in Philosophy, 2003, no. 8, pp. 5–17. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17275107
  20. Ulanovsky A. M. History and vectors of development of qualitative research in psychology. Methodology and History of Psychology, 2008, no. 2, pp. 129-139. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19011718
  21. Sharov A. S. Ontology of reflection: Nature, functions and mechanisms. Reflexive Processes and Management, 2005, no. 1, pp. 71–92. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25518149
  22. Shigabetdinova G. M. Phenomenon of reflection: Boundaries of the concept. Bulletin of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod, 2014, no. 2-1, pp. 415–422. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21755346
  23. Clegg J. W. The importance of feeling awkward: A dialogical narrative phenomenology of socially awkward situations. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2012, vol. 9 (3), рр. 262–278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2010.500357
  24. Cunliffe A. L. Reflexive dialogical practice in management learning. Management Learning, 2002, vol. 33 (1), pp. 35–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507602331002
  25. Devine R. T., Hughes C. Relations between false belief understanding and executive function in early childhood: A meta-analysis. Child Dev, 2014, vol. 85 (5), рр. 1777–1794. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12237
  26. Fernández P. R, Ettinger J. J, Gibson E. Can processing demands explain toddlers’ performance in false-belief tasks? Response to Setoh et al. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2017, vol. 114 (19), pp. E3750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1701286114
  27. Guignard S., Apostolidis T., Bertoldo R., Goula K. Looking to the future for being well-seen: further evidences about the normative feature of the future time perspective. Revue International de Psychologie Sociale, 2015, vol. 28 (2), pp. 7–23. URL: https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85016185495&origin=resultslist&sort= plf-f&src=s&st1=Looking+to+the+future+for+being+well-seen&st2=&sid= 28fb49ee728634a28d8dde5a6ca14c05&sot=b&sdt=b&sl=56&s=TITLE-ABS-KEY%28Looking+to+the+future+for+being+well-seen%29&relpos=0&citeCnt=3&searchTerm=   
  28. Hannush M. J. Toward a phenomenology of addiction: Embodiment, technology, transcendence, written by Frank Schalow. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 2018, vol. 49, issue 1, рр. 113–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15691624-12341340
  29. Hashem I. A. T., Yaqoob I., Anuar N. B., Mokhtar S., Gani A., Khan S. U. The rise of “big data” on cloud computing: Review and open research issues. Information Systems, 2015, vol. 47, pp. 98–115. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2014.07.006  
  30. Karpov A. O. The problem of separation the notions of “knowledce” and “information” in the knowledge society and its education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2017, vol. 237, pp. 804–810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.152
  31. Langager A. L., Roald T. Bodily and therapeutic movement. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 2018, vol. 49 (1), рр. 43–63. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15691624-12341336
  32. Lukianova N. A., Fell E. V. Meaning making in communication processes: The role of a human agency. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 200, pp. 614–617. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.047
  33. Ma W. J., Jazayeri M. Neural coding of uncertainty and probability. Annu Rev Neuroscience, 2014, vol. 37, pp. 205–220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014017
  34. Michael H., Herzog T. K., Scharnowski F. Time slices: What is the duration of a percept? PLOS Biology, 2016, vol. 14, issue 4, e1002433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002433.g003
  35. Mruck K., Breuer F. Subjectivity and reflexivity in qualitative research–The FQS Issues. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2003, vol. 4 (2), Art. 23. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-4.2.696
  36. Peters F. Theories of consciousness as reflexivity. Philosophical Forum, 2013, vol. 44 (4), pp. 341–372. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/phil.12018
  37. Rachel L. S. Embedding reflexivity within experiential qualitative psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2010, vol. 7 (3), pp. 233–243. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14780880802699092
  38. Rettie H., Emiliussen J. Practical impressions of interpretative phenomenological analysis from the novice’s standpoint. Nurse Researcher, 2018, vol. 26 (2). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/nr.2018.e1589
  39. Thiboutot C. Psychotherapy for the other: Levinas and the face-to-face relationship, written by Kevin C. Krycka, George Kunz, & George G. Sayre. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 2017, vol. 48, issue 1, pр. 155–160. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15691624-12341325
  40. Voloshina S. V., Demeshkina Т. A. The autobiographical story as a means of modeling global events. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 200, pp. 563–568 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.029
  41. Whitehead P. M., Smith T. G. Overcoming the impassable gulf: Phenomenologizing psychophysics. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 2018, vol. 49, issue 1, рр. 64–82. DOI: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15691624-12341337 
Date of the publication 28.02.2019