| 
User login
Parity of concepts design and research activity of pupils of 5-6 classes
The author considers the priority direction of realization of the Federal state educational standard of the basic general education (further FSES Open Company). The accent is transferred on education of originally free person, development of its individuality, creative activity, skill of independent movement in information fields. It is system-activity approach of training which is put in basis FSES Open Company provides: formation of readiness for self-development and continuous formation; designing and designing of the social environment of development trained in education system; active educational-cognitive activity trained; construction of educational process to the individual age, psychological and physiological characteristics of pupils.
According to the standard the basic educational program is realized by educational establishment through fixed and after-hour activity. The effective form of conducting educational activity is design and research activity. In the article the author stresses general and essentially distinctive characteristics of these concepts. Taking in attention age features of pupils an average part, it is important to not miss the moment of maintenance and development of interest to studying mathematics. Inclusion of such activity in educational process allows to develop at pupils motivation to the doctrine, to raise cognitive activity of pupils at lessons of mathematics, to develop skill to work in qualitatively new educational environment, to generate research skills and to build an individual trajectory of development of pupils.
system-activity the approach, design activity of pupils, research activity of pupils, the competence
1. Krupskaya N.K. Pedagogic composition in six volumes. Moscow: Pedagogics Publ., 1978, no. 1, 368 p. (In Russian).
2. Leont'evА.N. About formation of abilities. Questions of psychology, 1960, no. 1, pp. 7–17. (In Russian).
3. Pod'yakov A.N. Research behaviour: strategy, knowledge, the help, counteraction, the conflict. Moscow, 2006, 264p. (In Russian).
4. Prilepskaya N.A. To a question on creation of the innovative environment for productive training. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2011, no. 1, pp. 23–33. (In Russian).
5. Pushkareva E.A. Philosophical thinking for formation of reflexivity of knowledge of educational process. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2012, no. 1, pp. 74–78. (In Russian).
6. Ruzavin G.I. Methodology of scientific research: Studies. The grant for high schools. Moscow, 1999, p. 317. (In Russian).
7. Savtnkov A.I. Research training and designing in modern formation. Research work of schoolboys, 2004, no. 7, pp. 22–31. (In Russian).
8. Seregin G.M. Statement of a question as one of means of a deepening of understanding of a teaching material. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2012, no. 3, pp. 65–72. (In Russian).
9. Smoleusova T. V. Problems of implementation of the requirements of Federal State Educational Standards primary education in class and innovation. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2012, no. 6, pp. 5–10.(In Russian).
10. Chernishenko E.G. Formation of research culture of pupils in conditions of general educational establishment. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2012, no. 5, pp. 20–26. (In Russian).
