Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 172–187
UDC: 
37.022

Acquiring transdisciplinary knowledge by engineering students of Russian universities

Gorbunov V. I. 1 (Cheboksary, Russian Federation), Evdokimova O. K. 1 (Cheboksary, Russian Federation), Rimondi G. 2 (Parma, Italian Republic), Andreev V. V. 3 (Cheboksary, Russian Federation)
1 Chuvash State University
2 Moscow Pedagogical State University, Moscow, Russian Federation, Parma State University, Parma, Italy
3 Moscow Pedagogical State University, Moscow, Russian Federation, Chuvash State University, Cheboksary, Russian Federation
Abstract: 

Introduction. The paper investigates the problem of modernization and development of engineering education within the contemporary context of global challenges. The aim of the research is to identify the particularities of acquiring transdisciplinary knowledge by students pursuing a degree in the field of engineering.
Materials and Methods. The researchers took synergetic and systemic approaches to the study and conducted an analysis of university-level engineering education. The experimental substantiation involved processing and analyzing students’ examination results using the elements of cluster analysis.
Results. The authors have identified the main features of acquiring transdisciplinary knowledge by students pursuing a degree in the field of engineering. It has been revealed that the discipline ‘The Russian language and Standards of Speech’ can be considered as an integrating discipline in the curriculum ensuring acquiring transdisciplinary skills by engineering students. Moreover, the study has summarized international experience of applying transdisciplinary approach to training highly qualified specialists. The authors have proved that the discipline ‘The Russian language and standards of speech’ is one of the most effective means of promoting figurative thinking, which is significant for developing creative thinking of prospective engineers. Transdisciplinary approach, based on the rational relationship between the known and the unknown, creates sufficient motivation which can arouse and maintain students’ interest in the essence of problems in the process of learning and acquiring new knowledge.
Conclusions. The authors conclude about the specificity of acquiring transdisciplinary knowledge by university students pursuing a degree in the field of engineering.

Keywords: 

Transdisciplinarity; Interdisciplinary; Russian language; Standards of speech; Engineering education; Professional activity; Curriculum; Educational program

URL SCOPUS: https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85065089949&origin=...

Acquiring transdisciplinary knowledge by engineering students of Russian universities

For citation:
Gorbunov V. I., Evdokimova O. K., Rimondi G., Andreev V. V. Acquiring transdisciplinary knowledge by engineering students of Russian universities. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 172–187. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1901.11
References: 
  1. Gorbunov V. I., Evdokimova O. K., Lyapaeva L. V. Intelligence of regional technical institute students: posing the problem, means of evaluation, trial results. Yakovlev Chuvash State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2016, no. 1, pp. 82–90. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25792028
  2. Evdokimova O. K., Gorbunov V. I., Vasilyeva L. N. On the problem of training scientific-technical intelligentsia at the university. Yakovlev Chuvash State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, no. 3–2, pp. 173–180. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32274620
  3. Gorbunov V. I., Evdokimova O. K., Mineev A. I. Lifelong learning of humanitarian in the training system for bachelors in higher technical education. Studia Humanitatis, 2017, no. 1, pp. 7. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28960148
  4. Andreev V. V. On some aspects of bachelors and masters training in the field of information technologies and communication systems. Methodological Issues of Teaching of Information and Communication Technologies in the Higher Education, 2014, vol. 3 (1), pp. 37–38. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24833221
  5. Andreev V. V., Gibadulin R. Ya., Prodanov G., Zhdanov R. I. Russian institute for advanced study as a new form of training of highly trained teaching staff. Integration of Education, 2017, vol. 21 (4), pp. 623–636. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.089.021.201704.623-636
  6. Coeckelbergh M. The art, poetics, and grammar of technological innovation as practice, process, and performance. AI and Society, 2018, vol. 33 (4), pp. 501–510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0714-7
  7. Lebow D. G. A Social Machine for transdisciplinary research. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 2018, vol. 21, pp. 201–217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/4025
  8. Tejedor G., Segalàs J., Rosas-Casals M. Transdisciplinarity in higher education for sustainability: How discourses are approached in engineering education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, vol. 175, pp. 29–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.085
  9. Balsiger J. Transdisciplinarity in the class room? Simulating the co-production of sustainability knowledge. Futures, 2015, vol. 65, pp. 185–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.08.005
  10. Moore M., Martinson M. L., Nurius P. S., Kemp S. P. Transdisciplinarity in research: Perspectives of early career faculty. Research on Social Work Practice, 2018, vol. 28 (3), pp. 254–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731517708033
  11. Kudo S., Mursaleen H., Ness B., Nagao M. Exercise on transdisciplinarity: Lessons from a field-based course on rural sustainability in an aging society. Sustainability, 2018, vol. 10, issue 4, pp.  1155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041155
  12. Barrera J., Saura-Mas S., Blanco A. Transperformative education: Toward a new educational paradigm based on transdisciplinarity and artistic performativity. World Futures, 2018. Latest Articles. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2018.1463761
  13. Pohl C., Krütli P., Stauffacher M. Teaching transdisciplinarity appropriately for students' education level. GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 2018, vol. 27 (2), pp. 250–252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.2.14
  14. García Ochoa G., McDonald S., Monk N. Embedding Cultural Literacy in Higher Education: a new approach. Intercultural Education, 2016, vol. 27 (6), pp. 546–559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2016.1241551
  15. Khoo S.-M., Haapakoski J., Hellstén M., Malone J. Moving from interdisciplinary research to transdisciplinary educational ethics: Bridging epistemological differences in researching higher education internationalization(s). European Educational Research Journal, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904118781223 
  16. Markle R., Brenneman M., Jackson T., Burrus J., Robbins S. Synthesizing frameworks of higher education student learning outcomes. ETS Research Report Series, 2013, vol. 2013, issue 2, pp. i–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2013.tb02329.x
  17. Mittelstrass J. The order of knowledge: From disciplinarity to transdisciplinarity and back. European Review, 2018, vol. 26, supplement S2, pp. S68–S75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798718000273
  18. De Costa P. I., Norton B. Introduction: Identity, transdisciplinarity, and the good language teacher. Modern Language Journal, 2017, vol. 101, issue S1, pp. 3–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12368
  19. Jarvis J. Restorying for transdisciplinarity: A proposed teaching-learning strategy in a context of human rights education. The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 2018, vol. 14 (2), pp. a483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/td.v14i2.483
  20. Scholz R. W., Yarime M., Shiroyama H. Global leadership for social design: Theoretical and educational perspectives. Sustainability Science, 2018, vol. 13 (2), pp. 447–464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0454-0
  21. VanWynsberghe R., Herman A. C. Education for social change and pragmatist theory: five features of educative environments designed for social change. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 2015, vol. 34 (3), pp. 268–283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2014.988189
  22. Earl A., VanWynsberghe R., Walter P., Straka T. Adaptive education applied to higher education for sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 2018, vol. 19 (6), pp. 1111–1130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-08-2017-0131
  23. Fourati-Jamoussi F., Dubois M. J. F., Agnès M., Leroux V., Sauvée L. Sustainable development as a driver for educational innovation in engineering school: the case of UniLaSalle. European Journal of Engineering Education, 2018. Latest Articles. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2018.1501348
  24. Khoo S.-M. Sustainable knowledge transformation in and through higher education: A case for transdisciplinary leadership. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning, 2017, vol. 8 (3), pp. 5–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18546/IJDEGL.8.3.02
  25. Tamura M., Onuki M., Sekiyama M., Hara K., Uwasu M., Tsuji N., Ishimura G., Tanaka N., Mori  A., Mino T. Developing joint educational programs in sustainability science across different universities: a case study from Japan. Sustainability Science, 2018, vol. 13, issue 3, pp. 849–860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0503-8
  26. Di Giulio A., Defila R. Enabling university educators to equip students with inter- and transdisciplinary competencies. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 2017, vol. 18 (5), pp. 630–647. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-02-2016-0030
Date of the publication 28.02.2019