Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 121–137
© Lomonosova N. V., Zolkina A. V., 2018
UDC: 
378

Digital learning resources: Enhancing efficiency within blended higher education [In English]

Lomonosova N. V. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation), Zolkina A. V. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation)
1 National University of Science and Technology “MISIS”
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 4321
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article explores the problem of digitization of higher education aimed at enhancing students’ autonomous learning. The purpose of this research is to reveal the appropriate conditions of applying digital learning resources within blended higher education.
Materials and Methods. The research is based on general theoretical, empirical and statistical methods. The authors consider the main theoretical and pedagogical approaches to modern understanding of blended learning and report the results of an experiment focused on identifying an optimal proportion of digital and traditional methods of “teacher-learner” interaction. The analysis of the results are provided. Key structural constituents of blended learning are identified and justified by means of system analysis.
Results. The findings indicate that the system of blended learning comprises the interrelation of the following elements: (1) methodological, administrative (legal and financial), educational and technical support; (2) computerisation of all university-based processes; (3) control of protecting students’ rights; (4) solving significant social problem and (5) comprehensive assessment of digital educational resources. According to the systemic approach, each element of blended learning system is a system itself. At the same time, digital educational resources should be considered as basic elements of blended learning and an integral part of the whole education process, but not as an auxiliary tool for conventional education. Improvements in using digital educational resources in the system of blended learning can raise both students’ performance and quality of educational process as a whole. The study highlights the significance of an appropriate proportion (70 / 30) of using digital educational technologies and conventional teacher-student interactions.
Conclusions. The authors summarize the appropriate conditions of applying digital learning resources within blended higher education.

Keywords: 

Blended learning; Hybrid learning; Mixed-mode instruction; Electronic technology; Electronic learning resources; Professional competence; Administrative arrangements; Higher education; Information communication technology

98.383 Community of Inquiry | Social Presence | Online Discussion

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?src=s&origin=cto&ctoId=CTODS_1...

Digital learning resources: Enhancing efficiency within blended higher education

For citation:
Lomonosova N. V., Zolkina A. V. Digital learning resources: Enhancing efficiency within blended higher education [In English]. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 121–137. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1806.08
References: 
  1. Schneider O. A concept to simplify authoring of adaptive hypermedia eLearning structures. Interactive Learning Environments, 2018, vol. 26, issue 6, pp. 760–775. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1412987
  2. Tsai M.-C., Tsai C.-W. Applying online externally-facilitated regulated learning and computational thinking to improve students’ learning. Universal Access in the Information Society, 2018, vol. 17 (4), pp. 811–820. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0542-z
  3. Jones K. A., Sharma R. S. An experiment in blended learning: Learning without lectures.  2017 IEEE Conference on e-Learning, e-Management and e-Services (IC3e), 2017, pp. 1–6.  DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3e.2017.8409229
  4. Evseeva A. M. Blended learning as a form of foreign language teaching in technical university. Modern Problems of Science and Education, 2014, no. 6, pp. 955. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22878199
  5. Fomina A. S. Blended learning in higher schools: institutional, organizational, technological and pedagogical aspects. Theory and Practice of Social Development,2014, no. 21, pp. 272–279. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23049656 
  6. Wang Q., Huang C. Pedagogical, social and technical designs of a blended synchronous learning environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2018, vol. 49 (3), pp. 451–462. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12558
  7. Baragash R. S., Al-Samarraie H. Blended learning: Investigating the influence of engagement in multiple learning delivery modes on students’ performance. Telematics and Informatics, 2018, vol. 35, issue 7, pp. 2082–2098. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.07.010
  8. Osipova O. P. main stages of instructional design and expert evaluation of electronic learning resources. Open and Distance Education, 2015, no. 2, pp. 76–82. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24004882
  9. Osipova O. P. Quality of additional professional education in the conditions of remote support of professional development. Science and School, 2016, no. 1, pp. 82–91. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25738430
  10. Zolkin D. V., Lomonosova N. V. Methodology for development and implementation of new master`s degree curriculum in conditions of computerization in higher education. Open and Distance Education, 2017, no. 2, pp. 52–57. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/16095944/66/7  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29443401
  11. Laurillard D. The educational problem that MOOCs could solve: Professional development for teachers of disadvantaged students. Research in Learning Technology, 2016, vol. 24, pp. 29369. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v24.29369
  12. Janusz B.,  Bobrzyński J.,  Furgał M.,  De Barbaro B.,  Gdowska K. The need of qualitative research in psychiatry. Psychiatria Polska, 2010, vol. 44, issue 1, pp. 5–11. URL: https:// www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77952061675&origin=resultsl..."2010"%2ct&sl=20&s=AUTHOR-NAME%28Gdowska%29&relpos=0&citeCnt=11&searchTerm=#references 
  13. Lomonosova N. V. The optimization of criteria for blended learning university students based on rational mix traditional and electronic methods teaching. Open and Distance Education, 2016, no. 4, pp. 24–30. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/16095944/64/4  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28301080
  14. Lomonosova N. V. Basic principles of designing the system of blended learning at the university. Prepodavatel XXI vek, 2017, no. 2–1, pp. 64–71. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29461310
  15. Peters M. A., Jandric P. Dewey`s democracy and education in the age of digital reason: The global, ecological and digital turns. Open Review of Educational Research, 2017, vol. 4 (1), pp. 205–218.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2017.1395290
  16. Aagaard J. Media multitasking, attention, and distraction: A critical discussion. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 2015, vol. 14 (4), pp. 885–896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-014-9375-x
  17. Volkova S. V. Phenomenology of digital educational technologies. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, no. 1, pp. 93–106. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1801.06
  18. Young Hoan Cho, Hyoseon Choi, Jiwon Shin, Him Chan Yu, Yoon Kang Kim, Jung Yeon Kim. Review of Research on Online Learning Environments in Higher Education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 191, pp. 2012–2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.634 
  19. Kubrický J., Částková P. Teacher's competences for the use of web pages in teaching as a part of technical education teacher's ICT competences. Procedia  – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 174, pp. 3236–3242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.988 
  20. Babintsev V. P., Sapryka V. А., Serkina Ya. I., Ushamirskaya G. F.  Reform of higher education in Russia: habitus conflict. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 2016, vol. 17, issue 3, pp. 284–294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2016.17.284
  21. De-Marcos L., Garcia-Lopez E., Garcia-Cabot A. On the effectiveness of game-like and social approaches in learning: Comparing educational gaming, gamification & social networking. Computers & Education, 2016, vol. 95, pp. 99–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.008
  22. Hatlevik O. E. Examining the relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy, their digital competence, strategies to evaluate information, and use of ICT at school. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 2017, vol. 61, issue 5, pp. 555–567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1172501
  23. Miroshnichenko N. V. Distance learning environment: phenomenology and classification. Open and Distance Education, 2018, no. 2, pp. 5–9. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28301080
  24. Vostricova N. M. Possible models of blended learning in training of future bachelors of metallurgical majors. Open and Distance Education, 2018, no. 1, pp. 5–11. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/16095944/69/1  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32734701
  25. Rogers L., Twidle J. A pedagogical framework for developing innovative science teachers with ICT. Research in Science & Technological Education, 2013, vol. 31, issue 3, pp. 227–251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2013.833900

 

Date of the publication 31.12.2018