Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 245–265
© Davletyarova K. V., Medvedeva E. V., Ovchinnikova N. A., Ezhova G. S., Kapilevich L. V., 2018
UDC: 
612.8.01

Characteristics of brain bioelectric activity in disabled students: Combining cognitive and physical loads

Davletyarova K. V. 1 (Tomsk, Russian Federation), Medvedeva E. V. 1 (Tomsk, Russian Federation), Ovchinnikova N. A. 2 (Tomsk, Russian Federation), Ezhova G. S. 2 (Tomsk, Russian Federation), Kapilevich L. V. 3 (Tomsk, Russian Federation)
1 National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
2 National Research Tomsk State University
3 National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University; National Research Tomsk State University
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 8640
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article investigates mechanisms of physiological motor regulation and interaction of motor and cognitive activities in disabled people. The purpose of this study is to identify the characteristic features of brain bioelectric activity in students with visual or locomotor system disorders during cognitive and physical loads.
Materials and Methods. The participants were students with special education needs, as well as healthy students aged between 18 and 20. They were divided into three groups. The first group consisted of students with locomotor system disorders (type 3 and 4 scoliosis); the second group consisted of students with visual disorders (high degree myopia); the third group (control) was represented by students attending physical education classes twice a week in the main group of health. The studies were carried out in two stages: the first stage (before physical activity) involved conducting a cognitive test followed by EEG recording. The second stage consisted of PWC170 test, followed by a cognitive test. Finally, bioelectric brain activity was examined by means of EEG method.
Results. The results show that physical activity has a modulating effect on the cognitive sphere (in particular, on the function of attention and short-term memory) and on bioelectrical brain activity. The study indicated more significant effect on students with visual or locomotor system disorders than on healthy volunteers. In addition, the authors found that the nature, level and periodicity of physical activities, along with the formation of motor stereotypes, contribute to students' adaptation to educational activity. The authors analyzed the interrelation of psychophysiological characteristics, the effectiveness of cognitive activity and motor activity in students with disabilities and established approaches to managing the adaptation of students with special needs to conditions of inclusion by means of motor activity.
Conclusions. The mutual influence of physical and cognitive activities is realized by means of developing specific activity patterns of the cerebral cortex, which is reflected in the peculiarities of bioelectrical activity.

Keywords: 

Physiology; Nervous system; Electroencephalography; Myopia; Scoliosis; Adaptation

97.421 Myopia | Refractive Errors | Retinoscopy

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?src=s&origin=cto&ctoId=CTODS_1...

Characteristics of brain bioelectric activity in disabled students: Combining cognitive and physical loads

For citation:
Davletyarova K. V., Medvedeva E. V., Ovchinnikova N. A., Ezhova G. S., Kapilevich L. V. Characteristics of brain bioelectric activity in disabled students: Combining cognitive and physical loads. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 245–265. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1805.15
References: 
  1. Lalaeva G. S., Zakharova A. N., Kabachkova A. V., Mironov A. A., Kapilevich L. V. Psychophysiological features of cyclic and endurance athletes. Theory and Practice of Physical Culture, 2015, no. 11, pp. 73–75. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24842311   
  2. Makashova N. In. Comparative analysis of hemodynamic parameters in the assessment of the glaucoma process in patients with myopia. Bulletin of Ophthalmology, 2004, no. 2, pp. 25–29. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21061804
  3. Dorosheva E. A. Evolutionary approach to the formation of myopia: the restructuring of the visual analyzer as an adaptation to the social and cultural conditions. Experimental Psychology, 2014, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 83–96. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22593082
  4. Hysi P. G., Wojciechowski R., Rahi S. J., Hammond C. J. Genome-wide association studies of refrective error and myopia, lessons learned, and implication for the future. Investigation Ophthalmological and Visual Science, 2014, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 3344–3351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-14149
  5. Gwiazda J., Deng L. Seasonal variations in the progression of myopia in children enrolled in the correction of myopia evaluation trial. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 2014, vol. 55, issue 2, pp. 752–758. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.13-13029
  6. Modjtahedi B., Ferris F., Hunter D., Fong D. Public health burden and potential interventions for myopia. Ophthalmology, 2018, vol. 125, issue 5, pp. 628–630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.01.033
  7. Grudzińska E., Modrzejewska M. Modern diagnostic techniques for the assessment of ocular blood flow in myopia: Current state of knowledge. Journal of Ophthalmology, 2018, vol. 2018, article ID 4694789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4694789
  8. Cherednichenko N. L. The influence of physical activity on state of accommodation, refraktogenesis and regulation of the vegetative nervous system in children and adolescents. Medical News of North Caucasus, 2016, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 468–470. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.14300/mnnc.2016.11107
  9. Aprelev A. E., Setko N. P., Karaulova E. S., Pashinina R. V., Beilina E. B., Lozinskii A. S. Dependence of range of accommodation on the prevalence of CNS vegetal tone type at students with varying degree of myopia. Medical Journal of Bashkortostan, 2015, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 88–91. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23758223
  10. Chakraborty R., Ostrin L. A., Nickla D., Iuvone P. M., Pardue M. T., Stone R. A. Circadian rhythms, refractive development, and myopia. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, 2018, vol. 38, issue 3, pp. 217–245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12453
  11. Neupokoev S. N., Bredikhina J. P., Guseva N. L. Influence of muscle tension type on bioelectrical activity and regional blood flow in lower limbs of skilled. Theory and Practice of Physical Culture, 2017, no. 8, p. 25. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30621276
  12. Popova T. V. Variability of bioelectric activity of the brain in different states of athletes. Theory and Practice of Physical Culture, 2006, no. 8, pp. 20–22. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=14345145
  13. Red’ka O. V., Mayorov Yu. Spectral characteristics of the ongoing electroencephalogram in children suffering from visual dysfunctions. Neurophysiology, 2014, vol. 46, issue 2, pp. 149–159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-014-9421-x
  14. Schepers I. M.,  Hipp J. F., Schneider T. R.,  Röder B.,  Engel A. K. Functionally specific oscillatory activity correlates between visual and auditory cortex in the blind. Brain, 2012, vol. 135, issue 3, pp. 922–934. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws014
  15. Tilley S., Neale Ch., Patuano A., Cinderby S. Older people’s experiences of mobility and mood in an urban environment: A mixed methods approach using electroencephalography (EEG) and interviews. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2017, vol. 14, issue 2, p. 151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14020151
  16. Parka J. L., Fairweatherb M. M., Donaldson D. I. Making the case for mobile cognition: EEG and sports performance. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2015, vol. 52, pp. 117–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.02.014
  17. Gong A., Liu J., Li F., Liu F., Jiang C., Fu Y. Correlation between resting-state electroencephalographic characteristics and shooting performance. Neuroscience, 2017, vol. 366, pp. 172–183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.10.016
  18. Gawlik K., Zwierzchowska A., Manowska B., Celebańska D. Aerobic capacity of adults with intellectual disabilities. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, 2017, vol. 24 (1), pp. 117–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/12321966.1233999
  19. Klusiewicz A., Borkowski L., Sitkowski D., Burkhard-Jagodzińska K., Szczepańska B., Ładyga M. Indirect methods of assessing maximal oxygen uptake in rowers: Practical implications for evaluating physical fitness in a training cycle. Journal of Human Kinetics, 2016, vol. 50, issue 1, pp. 187–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0155
  20. Woost L., Bazin P.-L., Taubert M., Trampel R., Tardif C. L., Garthe A., Kempermann G., Renner U., Stalla G., Ott D. V. M., Rjosk V., Obrig H., Villringer A., Roggenhofer E., Klein  T. A. Physical exercise and spatial training: A longitudinal study of effects on cognition, growth factors, and hippocampal plasticity. Scientific Reports, 2018, vol. 8, article number: 4239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19993-9
  21. Rahe J., Becker J. Cognitive training with and without additional physical activity in healthy older adults: cognitive effects, neurobiological mechanisms, and prediction of training success. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 2015, vol. 7, p. 187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00187
  22. Czaprowski D., Kotwicki T., Biernat R. Physical capacity of girls with mild and moderate idiopathic scoliosis: influence of the size, length and number of curvatures. European Spine Journal, 2012, vol. 135, issue 3, pp. 922–934. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws014
  23. Bland J., Pfeiffer K., Eisenmann J. The PWC170: comparison of different stage lengths in 11-16 year olds. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 2012, vol. 21, issue 6, pp. 1099–1105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-2068-z
Date of the publication 31.10.2018