Integration of psychological knowledge and psychological community: Current trends and future perspectives
Introduction. The article explores integration in psychology with the main focus on integration of psychological knowledge and psychological community. The purpose of the research is to identify contemporary trends and characteristic features of integration processes in psychology.
Materials and Methods. The research is based on the communicative methodology of psychological science. The data of social psychological research were collected via survey methods and questionnaires. The respondents (n = 52) were representatives of scientific psychological community. The purpose of this study was to reveal the attitude of psychologists to individual parameters of integration in psychology.
Results. As a result, it was found that the problem of integration in psychology is clearly differentiated into two components – the integration of psychological knowledge and the integration of psychological community. It is asserted that each direction of integration has its own specifics, unique mechanisms of implementation, and special links with each other. On the basis of the results of the socio-psychological research, the authors identified perceptions and attitudes of psychological professional community to integration problem, key methodological problems of psychology, and the usefulness of foreign experience in its solution. The authors emphasize the potential of communicative methodology for solving the problems identified in this study.
Conclusions. The findings suggest that modern problems of psychological education are closely related to the unresolved key methodological problems of the subject, the method of psychology, and the opposition between academic and practical psychology.
Integration; Psychological knowledge; Community; Education; Academic psychology; Practical psychology
99.370 Pedagogical Support | Educational Process | Professional Competence
https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?src=s&origin=cto&ctoId=CTODS_1...
1. Yurevich A. V. Introduction to the problem. Methodology and History of Psychology, 2007, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 91–93. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19011771
2. Mironenko I. A. Activity theory: Quest for the unattainable and hope for the future (Reply to commentaries). Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 2016, vol. 50, issue 3, pp. 382–391. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-016-9353-7
3. Klochko V. E., Galajinsky E. V., Krasnoryadtseva O. M., Lukyanov O. V. System anthropological psychology: Framework of categories. Siberian Psychological Journal, 2015, no. 56, pp. 9–20. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23651476
4. Kabrin V. I. Anthropological fate of the subject. Methodology and History of Psychology, 2010, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 52–68. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19011551
5. Seryj A. V., Yanitskiy M. S., Solodukhin A. V., Trubnikova O. A. The methodological bases of the integrated approach development in psychological correction and psychotherapy of cardiological patients before and after coronary bypass surgery. Siberian Journal of Psychology, 2017, no. 63, pp. 89–101. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/63/7
6. Séamus P., Velez G., Qadafi A., Tennant J. The SAGE model of social psychological research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2018, vol. 13, issue 3, pp. 359–372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617734863
7. Kostromina S. N., Grishina N. V. The future of personality theory: A processual approach. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 2018, vol. 52, issue 2, pp. 296–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-018-9420-3
8. Lorion R. P. Reflections on community psychology's past and future: What if a stitch in time only saves six?. Journal of Community Psychology, 2018, vol. 46, issue 3, pp. 267–280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21954
9. Linkov V. Psychology is not primarily empirical science: A comparison of cultures in the lexical hypothesis tradition as a failure of introspection. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 2017, vol. 51, issue 2, pp. 285–302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-016-9375-1
10. Beauregard M., Trent N. L., Schwartz G. E. Toward a postmaterialist psychology: Theory, research, and applications. New Ideas in Psychology, 2018, vol. 50, pp. 21–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2018.02.004
11. Rolls E. T. Neurobiological foundations of aesthetics and art. New Ideas in Psychology, 2017, vol. 47, pp. 121–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2017.03.005
12. Haarlammert M., Birman D., Oberoi A., Jordana W. Moore inside‐out: representational ethics and diverse communities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 2017, vol. 60, issue 3-4, pp. 414–423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12188
13. Stivala A. Diversity and community: The role of agent‐based modeling. American Journal of Community Psychology, 2017, vol. 59, issue 3-4, pp. 261–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12131
14. Neal Z. Taking stock of the diversity and sense of community debate. American Journal of Community Psychology, 2017, vol. 59, issue 3-4, pp. 255–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12132
15. Miyatsu T., Nguyen K., McDaniel M. Five popular study strategies: Their pitfalls and optimal implementations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2018, vol. 13, issue 3, pp. 390–407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617710510
16. Lichty L. F., Palamaro‐Munsell E. Pursuing an ethical, socially just classroom: Searching for community psychology pedagogy. American Journal of Community Psychology, 2017, vol. 60, issue 3-4, pp. 316–326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12199
17. Bogomaz S. A. Assessment of psychological safety for the school graduates. Siberian Psychological Journal, 2009, no. 34, pp. 58–62. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=13024564
18. Mazilov V. A. Methodology of Psychological Science: History and Modernity. Monograph. Yaroslavl, Ushinsky Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University Publ., 2017, 419 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32263554
19. Yurevich A. V. Methodology and Sociology of Psychology. Monograph. Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Publ., 2010, 272 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20240047
20. Yurevich A. V. Social psychology of scientific activity. Monograph. Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS, 2013, 447 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20247707
21. Yanchuk V. A. Interparadigmal dialogue as a mechanism of deepening understanding psychological phenomenology. Methodology of Modern Psychology, 2014, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 276–296. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32381289
22. Yurevich A. V. Methodological liberalism in psychology. Questions of Psychology, 2001, no. 5, pp. 3–18. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15499972
23. Kozlov V. V. Problems of integrative socio-psychological research. Human Factor: Social Psychologist, 2018, no. 1 (35), pp. 35–46. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=34882156
24. Mascolo M. F. Beyond Objectivity and subjectivity: The intersubjective foundations of psychological science. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 2016, vol. 50, issue 4, pp. 543–554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-016-9357-3
25. Mammen J. Using a topological model in psychology: Developing sense and choice categories. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 2016, vol. 50, issue 2, pp. 196–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-016-9342-x
26. Shadrikov V. D. The subject matter of psychology (The inner world of human life). Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics, 2004, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5–19. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19429282