Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 216–235
UDC: 
372.016+811.133.1

Lexico-cultural focus of French as a second language acquisition as a contributing factor to successful academic mobility

Mikuta I. V. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation), Kurak G. V. 2 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation), Teleshova R. I. 3 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
1 Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk National Research University
2 Novosibirsk National Research University
3 Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article examines the problem of enhancing student academic mobility. The purpose of the study is to identify the main lexical and cultural difficulties encountered by students at different levels of French proficiency in various situations in a foreign educational environment in a multicultural society.
Materials and Methods. The authors used a questionnaire as a method of collecting survey information. Undergraduate students and graduates of Novosibirsk State University and Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University (n = 200) having experience of academic mobility were recruited for this study. The majority of respondents demonstrated B2 and C1 levels of language proficiency. The questionnaire contained a set of open-ended questions aimed at identifying linguistic and cultural difficulties experienced by students at a foreign university. The open questions enabled the respondents to express their opinion freely and completely. Moreover, the authors managed to collect useful information for developing individual educational trajectories. 63 students undertaking various degree courses at Novosibirsk State University who studied French at the beginning level for one academic year and reached A1-A2 levels of language proficiency were interviewed in order to identify which situations of everyday communication they considered as difficult. The authors clarified possible reasons for these difficulties.
Results. The authors reveal typical communicative situations which are not appropriately included in the language courses. In addition, the authors summarize lexical and cultural difficulties experienced by Russian students at French universities and emphasize that teaching French at modern higher education institution should include situations typical for academic communication of mobile students and develop cultural and cross-cultural competencies. Foreign language acquisition should be based on cultural phenomena included in learning situations, aimed at ensuring a productive intercultural dialogue.
Conclusions. The research highlighted the main lexical and cultural problems encountered by students at different levels of French proficiency in various situations of a foreign educational environment.

For citation:
Mikuta I. V., Kurak G. V., Teleshova R. I. Lexico-cultural focus of French as a second language acquisition as a contributing factor to successful academic mobility. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 216–235. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1806.14
References: 
  1. Astanina A. N., Verbitskaya N. O. The use of e-learning technique to improve the quality of education of university correspondence students. Professional Education in the Modern World, 2018, vol. 8,  no. 1, pp. 1670–1676.  (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32829644 
  2. Bagautdinov A. A., Minkin M. R., Ivanov A. F., Nizameeva A. M. Language as a constructor of social and cultural reality. Xlinguae, 2018, vol. 11, no. 1XL, pp. 33–42. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32755288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2018.11.01XL.04.
  3. Zarechneva N. G. Foreign language teaching in the context of competence-based approach. Professional Education in the Modern World, 2017, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1476–1480.  (In Russian) URL : https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32465215
  4. Leonova O. G. Conceptualization of the concept of «globalization» in modern science. Age of Globalization, 2018, no. 1, pp. 15–23. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32595467
  5. Onushchenko N. M. Integration of the mobile technologies into the process of teaching the French language. Pedagogical Education and Science, 2018, no. 1, pp. 104–107. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35006991
  6. Tangalycheva R. K. Theoretical-methodological bases of sociological study of intercultural communication. Monograph. Saint-Petersburg, Scythia-print Pub Publ., 2014,  332 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24208788
  7. Teleshova R. I. Reflections on the Russian sources in the work of Henri Troyat. Monograph. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Publ., 2014, 247 p. (In Russian) URL : https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25786534
  8. Khalyapina L. P. The main directions of teaching foreign languages in a multicultural world. Actual Problems of Philology and Methods of Teaching Foreign Languages, 2017, vol. 11, pp. 262–266. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29196782
  9. Kharitonova O. V. Academic mobility in the space of higher education. Man and Education, 2012, no. 2, pp. 41–45. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17823859
  10. Teslenko A. N., Ibrayeva A. B., Rakisheva A. Sh., Kulzhabaeva Zh. O. Double-diploma education in Kazakhstan as a tool of academic mobility of faculty and students. Sociological Studies, 2017, no. 6, pp. 138–142. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29405032
  11. Yarotskaya L. V. Foreign language and the formation of a professional personality (non-linguistic high school). Monograph.  Moscow, Triumf Publ., 2016, 258 p.  (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25908975
  12. Aba D. Addressing intercultural experience and academic mobility in higher education. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 2016, vol. 45, issue 6, pp. 487–502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2016.1236032
  13. Alipichev A. Yu., Galushkin A. A., Dronova  S. Yu., Panfilova E. A.  Towards successful implementation of CLIL courses in Russian universities. XLinguae, 2017, vol. 10, issue 4, pp. 345–356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2017.10.04.28
  14. Archanjo  R. Moving globally to transform locally? Academic mobility and language policy in Brazil. Language Policy, 2017, vol. 16,  issue 3,  pp. 291–312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-016-9408-0  
  15. Bajrami L.,  Ismaili M. The role of video materials in EFL classrooms. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2016, vol. 232, pp. 502–506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.068
  16. Bégin L. Quelques enjeux de mise en oeuvre de l’éducation au pluralisme. À propos de différence et liberté de georges leroux. Philosophiques, 2016, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 489–497. DOI https://doi.org/10.7202/1038218ar    
  17. Blondel C., Brissaud C., Conseil J., Jeantheau J.-P., Mortamet C. Les difficultés des adultes face à l’écrit: l’apport de l’épreuve de production écrite de l’enquête Information et vie quotidienne. Economie et Statistique, 2016, no. 490, pp. 37–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/estat.2016.10720
  18. Byram M., Wagner M. Making a difference: Language teaching for intercultural and international dialogue. Foreign language Annals, 2018, vol. 51, issue 1, pp. 140–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12319                                                                                            
  19. Rocher F. Identité nationale et multiculturalisme. Deux notions antagonistes ?, de Sabine Choquet, Paris, Classiques Garnier, 2015, 455 p. Politique et Sociétés, 2017, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 179–180. DOI : https://doi.org/10.7202/1040426ar  
  20. Devaux J., Oppenchaim N. La socialisation à la mobilité n’est-elle qu’une question de genre ? L’exemple des adolescents de catégories populaires du rural et de zones urbaines sensibles. Les Annales de la Recherche Urbaine, 2017, no. 112, pp. 48–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/aru.2017.3239
  21. Duguet A., Le Mener M., Morlaix S. Les déterminants de la réussite à l’université. Quels apports de la recherche en Education ? Quelles perspectives de recherche ?. Spiral – Revue de Recherches en Education,  2016, no. Suppl.E 57,  pp. 31–53.  https://doi.org/10.3406/spira.2016.1745
  22. Gargano T., Throop J. Logging on: Using online learning to support the academic nomad. Journal of International Students, 2017, vol. 7, issue 3, pp. 918–924. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.570041  
  23. Gashi-Berisha V. Literary and intercultural aspects in methodology of teaching French as a foreign language [Les aspects littéraires et interculturels dans les méthodologies du français langue étrangère]. Xlinguae, 2018, vol. 11, issue 1XL, pp. 92–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2018.11.01XL.09
  24. Gélinas-Proulx A., Labelle J., Jacquin Ph. Compétence interculturelle : adaptation d’un Modèle initial pour les directions d’établissement scolaire de langue française du Québec et du Nouveau-Brunswick. Revue des Sciences de L’éducation, 2017, vol. 43, issue 2, pp.  119–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1043028ar  
  25. Gonzalez-Monteagudo J. Transitions et transformations des étudiants internationaux en contextes de mobilité académique. Pensée Plurielle, 2016, vol. 1, no. 41, pp. 111–122. DOI : https://doi.org/10.3917/pp.041.0111  
  26. Harris V. W., Kumaran M., Harris H. J., Moen D., Visconti B. Assessing multicultural competence (knowledge and awareness) in study abroad experiences. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2017.1421901      
  27. Jackson J. ‘Breathing the smells of native styled English’: A narrativized account of an L2 sojourn.  Language and Intercultural Communication, 2016, vol. 16, issue 3, pp. 332–348.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2016.1168047
  28. Kopylovskaya M. Y., Dobrova T. Y. Dealing With “West-East” cultural divide: the problem of cultural unawareness in ESP for international relations. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 2016, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 505–516.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP1603505K  
  29. Özdemir E. Promoting EFL learners’ intercultural communication effectiveness: a focus on Facebook. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2017, vol. 30, issue 6, pp. 510–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1325907
  30. Potvin M. L’éducation au pluralisme : la centralité des sciences sociales. Philosophiques, 2016, vol. 43,  no  2, pp.  481–488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1038217ar  
  31. Saillant F., Lévy J. J.,  Ramirez-Villagra A. Perspectives interculturelles, droits et reconnaissance à Montréal. Anthropologie et Sociétés, 2017, vol. 41, no. 3, pp.  155–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1043046ar  
  32. Sari L. La Méditerranée orientale ou la fusion des altérités et des cultures. Babel, 2017, no. 36, pp. 27–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/babel.4938
  33. Urciuoli B. La « diversité » comme capital. La re-conceptualisation néolibérale de la différence linguistique et sociale. Anthropologie et Sociétés, 2015, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 91–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1034761ar  
  34. Welply O. Re-imagining otherness: an exploration of the global imaginaries of children from immigrant backgrounds in primary schools in France and England. European Educational Research Journal, 2015, vol. 14, issue 5, P. 430–453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904115603733
  35. White B. W., Emongo L., Hsab G. Présentation. Vers une anthropologie de l’interculturel. Anthropologie et Sociétés, 2017, vol.  41,  no. 3, pp. 9–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1043040ar  
  36. Yu Y., Moskal M. Missing intercultural engagements in the university experiences of Chinese international students in the UK.  Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 2018. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2018.1448259
Date of the publication 31.12.2018