Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 59–72
UDC: 
378

Universal humanitarian competencies as a basis for developing professional competence of a modern teacher

Bekoeva M. I. 1 (Vladikavkaz, Russian Federation), Ambalova S. A. 2 (Vladikavkaz, Russian Federation), Takhokhov B. A. 2 (Vladikavkaz, Russian Federation)
1 Federal State educational institution of higher education budget «North-Ossetian State University by the name of Kosta Levanovich Khetagurov», Vladikavkaz, Russia.
2 Federal State educational institution of higher education budget «North-Ossetian State University by the name of Kosta Levanovich Khetagurov», Vladikavkaz, Russia
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article affirms the idea that the role of a teacher in modern education is not determined by transmission of a certain bundle of knowledge, information and practical experience. Thus, the work addresses a significant scientific problem of identifying the set of universal humanitarian competences which form the basis of modern teachers’ professional competence. The purpose of the research is to identify a specific corpus of universal humanitarian competences of teachers, creating a conceptual and methodological level of their professional competence.
Materials and Methods. The methodology of the work is based on the humanistic paradigm of education, focused on individual’s free development; systemic, personality-centered, activity-based and competence-based approaches, using such methods as generalization and analysis, comparison and description.
Results. The study found that competence-based approach updated in European-American and Russian education determined addressing to competences necessary for teachers’ professional and personal development, on the other hand, permanent complication of their professional duties, the need for psychological and pedagogical support for students at a high level generate such competencies, which are important ‘at this particular moment’, in today's classroom, but at the same time, they have universal humanitarian nature. From the authors’ point of view, these competencies constitute teachers’ innovativeness and creativity, their ability to create student-centered educational environment, improve culture of teaching and learning, encourage them for a constant creative search. The corpus of such competencies are dialogical, co-creative, improvisational, directorial, game-technical, multicultural and inclusive. Their brief definitions are presented in the article.
Conclusions. The implementation of the proposed approach to preparation of students creates necessary conditions for a substantial expansion of a range of professional and pedagogical competences of prospective teachers, diversifies and enriches the educational process within a university, contributes to strengthening students’ civic position and developing their practical intelligence and humanitarian outlook.

Keywords: 

Competence; Practical intellect; Creativity; Dialogicality; Leadership; Co-creation; Igrotehnic Competence; Improvisation

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?src=s&origin=cto&ctoId=CTODS_1...

Universal humanitarian competencies as a basis for developing professional competence of a modern teacher

For citation:
Bekoeva M. I., Ambalova S. A., Takhokhov B. A. Universal humanitarian competencies as a basis for developing professional competence of a modern teacher. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 59–72. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1806.04
References: 
  1. Baidenko V. I., Selezneva N. A. Today''s round of the bologna process: continued optimism. and a little bit about Russian (Paper 1). Higher Education in Russia, 2017, no. 10, pp. 94–108. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30383248
  2. Bezrukih M. M., Zhadko N. V. About key competences of the teacher and "borders" of pedagogical education. Pedagogy, 2014, no. 5, pp. 3–7. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22830083
  3. Belotserkovsky A. V. On coordination of educational and professional standards. Higher Education in Russia, 2015, no. 6, pp. 26–31. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23929712
  4. Bolotov V. A., Motova G. N., Navodnov V. G., Ryzhakova O. E. New conceptual approach towards selecting the best educational programmes. Higher Education in Russia, 2016, no. 11, pp. 5–16. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27330096
  5. Vedernikova L. V., Elantseva S. A., Povoroznyuk O. A. The development of professional personal position of an educator as a creative professional in the context of modernizing the system of education. Pedagogical Education and Science, 2016, no. 1, pp. 51–59. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26644497
  6. Dakhin A. N. Educational project: History and innovations. Journal of Pedagogical Innovations, 2016, no. 1, pp. 18–26. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25714889  
  7. Zimnya I. A. Winter key competence-a new paradigm of the result of education. Higher Education Today, 2003, no. 5, pp. 34–42. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21956022
  8. Ibragimov G. I., Ibragimova E. M. Competence assessment: Challenges and solutions. Higher Education in Russia, 2016, no. 1, pp. 43–52. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24993105
  9. Karavaeva E. V. Qualifications of higher education and professional qualifications: Harmonization with efforts. Higher Education in Russia, 2017, no. 12, pp. 5–12. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30770719
  10. Kasprzhak A. G., Kalashnikov S. P. The priority of educational outcomes as a tool for modernization of teacher training programs. Psychological Science and Education, 2014, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 87–104. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22413089
  11. Prokhorov V. A. Professional standard and Federal State Educational Standard for undergraduate programs. Higher Education in Russia, 2018, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 31–36. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32334328
  12. Rusakova S. P. Development of critical thinking using the web resource LearningApps.org on the informatics lessons. Journal of Pedagogical Innovations, 2017, no. 4, pp. 93–100.(In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32268692  
  13. Sarantsev G. I. Subject and pedagogical thinking in professional competences of the teacher. Pedagogy, 2015, no. 10, pp. 59–64. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25054211
  14. Senashenko V. S. On the reforming of national higher education system. Higher Education in Russia, 2017, no. 6, pp. 5–15. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29381630
  15. Tatur Yu. G. The competence in the structure of the model of quality of training of specialists. Higher Education today, 2004, no. 3, pp. 20–26. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21823723
  16. Khutorskoy A. V. Training MetaTrader approach to design education. Innovations in Education, 2017, no. 12, pp. 5–20. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30684939
  17. Khutorskoy A. V. Methodological foundations for applying the competence approach to designing education. Higher Education in Russia, 2017, no. 12, pp. 85–91. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30770728
  18. Alshahrani S., Ahmed E., Ward R. The influence of online resources on student–lecturer relationship in higher education: A comparison study. Journal of Computers in Education, 2017, vol. 4 (2), pp. 87–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-017-0083-8 
  19. Boer de E., Janssen F. J. J. M., van Driel J. H. Using an attribution support tool to enhance the teacher efficacy of student science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2016, vol. 27, issue 3, pp. 303–324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9461-8  
  20. Boukaert M. Designing a materials development course for EFL student teachers: Principles and pitfalls. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 2016, vol. 10, issue 2, pp. 90–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2015.1090994
  21. Claessens L. C. A., van Tartwijk J., van der Want A. C., Pennings H. J. M., Verloop N., den Brok P. J., Wubbels T. Positive teacher–student relationships go beyond the classroom, problematic ones stay inside. The Journal of Educational Research, 2017, vol. 110, issue 5, pp. 478–493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2015.1129595
  22. Coenders F., Terlouw C. A Model for in-service teacher learning in the context of an innovation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2015, vol. 26, issue 5, pp. 451–470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9432-5
  23. McGrath K. F., Van Bergen P. Who, when, why and to what end? Students at risk of negative student–teacher relationships and their outcomes. Educational Research Review, 2015, vol. 14, pp. 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.12.001
  24. Mohammadi M., Moradi K. Exploring change in EFL teachers’ perceptions of professional development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 2017, vol. 19 (1), pp. 22–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2017-0002
  25. Okeke C. I., Mtyuda P. N. Teacher job dissatisfaction: implications for teacher sustainability and social transformation. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 2017, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 54–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2017-0004
Date of the publication 31.12.2018