Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 143–157
© Brylina I. V., 2018
UDC: 
316.74:378.015.2–0.43.86

Formation of new anthropological project of the modern education in the context of non-classical philosophy

Brylina I. V. 1 (Tomsk, Russian Federation)
1 National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 5300
Abstract: 

Introduction. The author investigates the problem of rethinking the Western European classical heritage by the philosophy of education. The purpose of the research is to reveal the potential of non-classical philosophy to the formation of a new anthropological project of modern education.

Materials and Methods. The author uses methods of analysis and synthesis studying the genesis and evolution of education in different historical epochs: from Antiquity to the present day. The method of comparative analysis is applied to comparing and revealing the differences between anthropological projects of classical and nonclassical philosophy as ways of connecting man and education. The categories of Plato’s ‘taking care of the self’ and M. Foucault's ‘techniques of the self’ are explicated.
Results. The connection between human evolution and transformation of education is clarified. The author analyses the changes of anthropological projects in the context of education evolution from Antiquity to the present day and compares Plato and M. Foucault’s practices of ‘taking care of the self’’. The potential of nonclassical philosophy to form a new anthropological project of modern education is revealed.
Conclusions. It is concluded that the new anthropological project of education is different from classical projects which were based on the “ascent” to a single form, to the ideal, the model, the norm, the meaning, and the truth (Eidos - God - Beauty - Experience - Racio - Will). The main anthropological idea of modern university education is the strategy of self-determination, self-development and self-actualization of a learner.

Keywords: 

Human Evolution; Philosophy of education; Evolution of education; Transformation of education; New anthropological project; Self-determination; Self-actualization.

74.917 Martin Heidegger | Vilnius | Russian Philosopher

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?src=s&origin=cto&ctoId=CTODS_1...

Formation of new anthropological project of the modern education in the context of non-classical philosophy

For citation:
Brylina I. V. Formation of new anthropological project of the modern education in the context of non-classical philosophy. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 143–157. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1805.09
References: 
  1. Bauman Z. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge, Polity Press Publ., 2006, 228 p. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19650047
  2. Barnett R. Understanding the university. Alma Mater, 2008, no. 6, pp. 46–57. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=11582781 
  3. Beck U. Risk Society: Towards Another Modernity. Monograph. Moscow, Progress-Tradition Publ., 2000, 384 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20241833 
  4. Ardashkin I. B. Philosophy of education as a social development factor: World trends and prospects for Russia. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 166, pp. 277–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.524 
  5. Rogobete S. E. The self, technology and the order of things: In Dialogue with Heidegger, Ellul, Foucault and Taylor. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 183, pp. 122–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.854
  6. Cristian I. Foucault's idea of philosophy as “care of the self”: Critical assessment and conflicting metaphilosophical views. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, vol. 71, pp. 76–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.011
  7. Hrbackova K.,  Suchankova E. Self-determination approach to understanding of motivation in students of helping professions. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2016, vol. 217, pp. 688–696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.120
  8. Gonzalez-Cutre D., Sicilia A., Sierra A. C., Ferriz R., Hagger M. S. Understanding the need for novelty from the perspective of self-determination theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 2016,  vol. 102,  pp. 159–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.036
  9. Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York, The Guilford Press Publ., 2017,  756 p. URL: https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/11966826
  10. Deci E. L., Olafsen A. H., Ryan R. M. Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2017, vol. 4, pp. 19–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108  
  11. Avanesov S. S. Self-realization and self-creation. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 2009, no. 2, pp. 133–135. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=11968237
  12. Zavyalov B. M. Anthropological project of Plato in the modern practice of philosophical education. Human. Culture. Education, 2013, no. 1, pp. 12. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21116265
  13. Sapogova E. E. “Care about myself”: Autobuilding life as a semantic system. Herald of Humanitarian Education, 2015, no. 3, pp. 49–66. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26552350
  14. Rozin V. M. The concept of "taking care of yourself": philosophical, scientific, artistic and author's versions. Culture and Art, 2017, no. 7, pp. 50–56. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29809825
  15. Krasikov V. I. Reflective remembrance in the formation of self. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 2017, no. 39, pp. 22–29. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30715382
  16.  Petrova G. I. "Take care of myself" is technology or anthropology. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 2009, no. 2, pp. 136–143. (In Russian)  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=11968238
  17. Vishnevsky Yu. R., Vishnevsky S. Yu. The ideas of M. Foucault on education as a social institute. Surgut State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2015, no. 2, pp. 25–32. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24380799
  18. Petrova G. I., Gural A. K., Brylina I. V., Kornienko A. A., Stupnikova O. B. “The care of the self” practice in a contemporary culture. European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS), 2016, vol. XIX, pp. 666–673. DOI:  http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.01.88
  19. Yampolskaya L. I. Conceptualizing of classical "idea of the university" in nonclassical variant. Monograph. Tomsk, STT Publ., 2014, 228 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22947175
  20. Borovinskaya D. N. Creative-informational model of man: a philosophical analysis of social interrelations. Monograph. Tyumen, Tyumen State University Publ., 2010, 125 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19669521
  21. Petrova G.,  Smokotin V.,  Brylina I.,  Kornienko Al.,  Kornienko An.,  Nikitina Y.,  Kachalov N. A comparative analysis of classical and postmodern views on the idea of a university. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 206,  pp. 469–473. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.085
  22. Kazarina L.,  Itsenko I. Research competencies condition assessment of pupils from humanitarian-oriented classes of comprehensive school. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 206, pp. 342–347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.062
  23. Karpov A. O. Dissonance tolerance as a new principle of the cross-cultural sustainability. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2017, vol. 237, pp. 723–730. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.113 
  24. Borovinskaya D. N. Creative thinking: the main directions of research. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 2017, no. 40, pp. 22–31. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30778979  
  25. Petrova G. I., Brylina I. V., Kulizhskaya E. G., Bogoryad N. V. Corporate culture of contemporary research university in search of complementarity of humanitarian and commercial principles in education (Russian context). Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 166, pp. 505–510. DOI:  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.562
  26. Petrova G., Gural S., Brylina I., Kornienko Al., Kornienko An., Nikitina U., Kachalov N. Humanitarian meaning of university professional education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 206, pp. 455–458. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.082 
  27. Anikina E., Ivankina L., Tumanova I. Human well-being and educational investment efficiency. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 166, pp. 48–52. DOI:  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.481
Date of the publication 31.10.2018