Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 139–153
© Melnikova O. Y., Zhigadlo A. P., 2018
UDC: 
378.14

Ecological competence of bachelors of socio-economic profile in the context of the education principles for sustainable development

Melnikova O. Y. 1 (Omsk, Russian Federation), Zhigadlo A. P. 2 (Omsk, Russian Federation)
1 Russian State Professionally Pedagogical University
2 Siberian State Automobile and Highway University (SIBADI)
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 4413
Abstract: 

Introduction. The problem of ecological competence formation of Bachelors of socio-economic profile in accordance with the world trends and goals of the country's economic development is investigated in the article. The purpose of the article is to reveal the level of the ecological competence formation of Bachelors of socio-economic profile for sustainable development.
Materials and Methods. The sample consisted of 427 first and second-year undergraduate students studying for socio-economic degrees at higher educational institutions in Omsk and Krasnoyarsk. To identify the level of ecological competence formation, the author’ diagnostic tools are used.
Results. As a result of the theoretical analysis of the vast base of scientific research, the authors’ interpretation of ecological competence with respect to bachelors of socio-economic profile was proposed. The authors revealed its content, and also described the levels of the formation of ecological competence. A diagnostic tool developed by the authors was used for monitoring. The results of the monitoring revealed a low and very low levels of environmental competence for most undergraduate students studying for socio-economic degrees.
Conclusions. As a result, the level of environmental competence of undergraduate students studying for socio-economic degrees has been identified. In conclusion, the authors substantiated the need for considering the ecological competence of bachelors of socio-economic profile as profile-specialized and include it in the set of learning outcomes of the educational program. Conclusions are drawn that implementing the system of environmental training contributes to enhancing the level of ecological competence of undergraduate students studying for socio-economic degrees.

Keywords: 

Sustainable development of civilization; Education for sustainable development; Economic development; Environmental competence; Bachelor of socio-economic profile; Diagnostic tools; System of ecological training

99.370 Pedagogical Support | Educational Process | Professional Competence

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?src=s&origin=cto&ctoId=CTODS_1...

Ecological competence of bachelors of socio-economic profile in the context of the education principles for sustainable development

For citation:
Melnikova O. Y., Zhigadlo A. P. Ecological competence of bachelors of socio-economic profile in the context of the education principles for sustainable development. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 139–153. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1803.10
References: 
  1. Abu-Saad I. Access to higher education and its socio-economic impact among Bedouin Arabs in Southern Israel. International Journal of Educational Research, 2016, vol. 76, pp. 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.06.001
  2. Balsiger J., Förster R., Mader C., Nagel U., Sironi H., Wilhelm S., Zimmermann A. B. Transformative Learning and Education for Sustainable Development. GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 2017, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 357–359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.26.4.15.
  3. Biasutti M., De Baz T., Alshawa H. Assessing the Infusion of Sustainability Principles into University Curricula. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 2016, vol. 18 (2), pp. 21–40. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2016-0012
  4. Constantinescu C. Valuing Interdependence of Education, Trade and the Environment for the Achievement of Sustainable Development. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, vol. 116, pp. 3340–3344. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.760
  5. Eichholtz P. M. A., Kok N., Quigley J. M. Ecological Responsiveness and Corporate Real Estate. Business and Society, 2016, vol. 55, issue 3, pp. 330–360. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0007650315575118
  6. Golubeva I., Guntersdorfer I. R., Preparing Professionals for Working in Multicultural and Democratic Europe: Two Pedagogical Programs – Their Assessment and Collaborations. Pedagogy, 2017, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 39–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.15823/p.2017.53
  7. Herman B. C. Students' environmental NOS views, compassion, intent, and action: Impact of place‐based socioscientific issues instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2018, vol. 55, issue 4, pp. 600–638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21433
  8. Illankoon I. M. Chethana S., Tam V. W. Y., Le K. N. Environmental, Economic, and Social Parameters in International Green Building Rating Tools. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 2016, vol. 143, issue 2. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ei.1943-5541.0000313
  9. Kluttz J.,  Walter P. Conceptualizing Learning in the Climate Justice Movement. Adult Education Quarterly, 2018, vol. 68, issue 2, pp. 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713617751043
  10. Lean Filho W., Nesbit S. et al. (Eds) New Developments in Engineering Education for Sustainable Development. Switzerland, Springer Publ., 2016, 321 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32933-8
  11. Ostenson J. A., Clegg J. W., Wiggins B. J. Industrialized Higher Education and its Sustainable Alternatives. The Review of Higher Education, 2017, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 509–532. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2017.0020
  12. Rauch A., Hulsink W. Putting Entrepreneurship Education Where the Intention to Act Lies: An Investigation Into the Impact of Entrepreneurship Education on Entrepreneurial Behavior. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2015, vol. 14 (2), pp. 187–204. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amle.2012.0293
  13. Stanszus L., Fischer D., Bˆhme T., Frank P., Fritzsche J., Geiger S., Harfensteller J., Grossman P., Schrader U. Education for Sustainable Consumption through Mindfulness Training: Development of a Consumption-Specific Intervention. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 2017, vol. 19 (1), pp. 5–21. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2017-0001
  14. Abdrakhimov V. Z., Abdrakhimova E. S., Lobachev D. A. Environmental Education for Specialists in Waste Management Industries Promotes the Development of “Green” Economy”. Pedagogical Education in Russia, 2016, no. 4, pp. 153–159. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26105338
  15. Bityukova V. Environmental Responsibility of Russian Industry: Regional Perspective. Ecology and Industry of Russia, 2016, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 4–11. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18412/1816-0395-2016-4-4-11
  16. Vishnyakov Y., Kiseleva S. National Ideological Message and Environmentally Oriented Technological Development of Russia in 21st Century. Ecology and Industry of Russia, 2016, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 53–56. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18412/1816-0395-2016-4-53-56  
  17. Gagarin A. V. In the "Year Of Ecology": Ecological Component in the Professional Training of Students (Relevant Demand, Integrative Content, Technological Innovations, and Conditions for Effective Implementation). Akmeology, 2017, no. 4, pp. 47–50. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29841426
  18. Gilyazova I. B., Melynikova O. Y. Diagnosis Instrumentary for Students’ Scientific Outlook components Evaluation Within the Frame of Steady Civilization Development. Bulletin of Ryazan State University named for S. A. Yesenin, 2012, no. 4, pp. 15–23. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18968654
  19. Girusov E. V. Humanistic Potential of Ecological Culture. Economic and Social Research, 2016, no. 4, pp. 103–107. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27531200
  20. Glazachev S. N., Grishaeva J. M. Ecological education in humanitarian higher educational institution: competence approach. Social and Humanitarian Knowledge, 2013, no. 4, pp. 116–131. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19690769
  21. Zhigadlo A. P., Bashkova S. A., Tarasyuk O. V. To the question of development of profile and specialized competences of the bachelor of the vocational education. Omsk Scientific Herald, 2014, no. 4, pp. 108–109. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22566289
  22. Kavtaradze D. N., Brudnyj A. A. Education for sustainable development: a constructive ecological worldview. Educational Policy, 2011, no. 6, pp. 37–60. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26138016
  23. Murtazina L. G., Gaysin I. T. Conceptual Approaches to Formation Environmental Competence in German Higher Education Institutions. Environmental Consulting, 2014, no. 3, pp. 30–33. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22779897
  24. Muhutdinova T. Z. Innovative development of the regional economy, innovative environmental education. Herald of the Kazan Technological University, 2010, no. 12, pp. 228–232. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15540409
  25. Peterson L. G., Kubysheva M. A. Technology of pragmatist method in the system of vocational pedagogical education. Pedagogical Education and Science, 2016, no. 5, pp. 127–138. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27509678
Date of the publication 30.06.2018