Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 55–73
© Koltsova E. A., Kartashkova F. I., 2018
UDC: 
81`23+81`27+811.111

Functions of inner speech: linguistic, pragmatic and psychological aspects

Koltsova E. A. 1 (Ivanovo, Russian Federation), Kartashkova F. I. 2 (Ivanovo , Russian Federation)
1 Ivanovo State Power Engineering University
2 Ivanovo State University
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 4901
Abstract: 

Introduction. The paper considers cognitive functions and linguistic nature of inner speech which serves as a clue to the problem of thinking and speech, to human consciousness. This article offers an interdisciplinary approach to the phenomenon under consideration integrating linguistic and psychological aspects. The aim of the paper is to study the functions of inner speech comparing the linguistic results obtained with the data of psychological and neurophysiological observations.
Materials and Methods. Inner speech being a purely psychological phenomenon by nature is studied in linguistics through literary texts, thus becoming an object of modelling. The material used for the undertaken research is presented by speech episodes from English literary discourse which include the depiction of internal cognitive activity. The analysis focuses on anthroponymic evaluative utterances studied via a number of methods, namely contextual and definition methods and pragmalinguistic description. To implement the interdisciplinary approach to the studied phenomenon, a comparative analysis of the linguistic results and the data of empirical experiments conducted by psychologists and neurophysiologists was carried out.
Results. The research has allowed identifying communication targets and objectives characteristic of internal speech, the episodes of which contain evaluative anthroponymic expressions. The main functions performed by depicted inner speech are regulatory, reflective (and self-reflective) and motivating ones. The study has revealed some gender-based similarities and discrepancies depending on the gender of the speaker. The link between the appearance of inner speech and a certain emotional state has been demonstrated.
Conclusions. The analysis of text episodes of internalized speech enabled the authors to reveal the functional specificity of internal speech within the framework of literary discourse. The comparison of the results of linguistic research conducted with the data obtained in psychological and neurophysiological studies has shown the correlation and similarity between them. The interdisciplinary approach to the considered phenomenon makes it possible to expand the concept of inner speech and shed light on those cognitive processes which underlie it.

Keywords: 

Inner speech; Self-talk; Evaluative names; Self-esteem; Self-motivation; Reflection; Regulatory function; Gender

92.701 Hallucinations | Inner Speech | Schizophrenia

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?src=s&origin=cto&ctoId=CTODS_1...

Functions of inner speech: Linguistic, pragmatic and psychological aspects

For citation:
Koltsova E. A., Kartashkova F. I. Functions of inner speech: linguistic, pragmatic and psychological aspects. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 55–73. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1804.04
References: 
  1. Alderson-Day B., Fernyhough C. Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology. Psychological Bulletin, 2015, vol. 141, issue 5, pp. 931–965. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000021
  2. Baddeley A. D., Hitch G. Working memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 1974, vol. 8, pp. 47–89.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1
  3. Baddeley A. Working memory. Current Biology,2010, vol. 20, issue 4, pp. R136–R140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.12.014
  4. Alderson-Day B., Bernini M., Fernyhough C. Uncharted features and dynamics of reading: Voices, characters, and crossing of experiences. Consciousness and Cognition, 2017, vol. 49, pp. 98–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.01.003
  5. Garrison J. R., Moseley P., Alderson-Day B., Smailes D., Fernyhough C., Simons J. S. Testing continuum models of psychosis: No reduction in source monitoring ability in healthy individuals prone to auditory hallucinations. Cortex, 2017, vol. 91, pp. 197–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.11.011
  6. Holmes E. A., Lang T. J., Shah D. M. Developing interpretation bias modification as a “cognitive vaccine” for depressed mood: Imagining positive events makes you feel better than thinking about them verbally. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2009, vol. 118 (1), pp. 76–88. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012590
  7. Moritz S., Hörmann C. C., Schröder J., Berger T., Jacob G. A., Meyer B., Holmes E. A., Späth C., Hautzinger M., Lutz W., Rose M., Klein J. P. Beyond words: Sensory properties of depressive thoughts. Cognition and Emotion, 2014, vol. 28, issue 6, pp. 1047–1056. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013.868342
  8. Moseley P., Smailes D., Ellison A., Fernyhough C. The effect of auditory verbal imagery on signal detection in hallucination-prone individuals. Cognition, 2016, vol. 146, pp. 206–216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.015
  9. Fama M. E., Hayward W., Snider S. F., Friedman R. B., Turkeltaub P. E. Subjective experience of inner speech in aphasia: Preliminary behavioral relationships and neural correlates. Brain and Language, 2017, vol. 164, pp. 32–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2016.09.009
  10. Whitehouse A. J. O., Maybery M. T., Durkin K. Inner speech impairments in autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2006, vol. 47, issue 8, pp. 857–865. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01624.x
  11. Schnell Z., Varga E., Tényi T., Simon M., Hajnal A., Járai R., Herold R. Neuropragmatics and irony processing in schizophrenia – Possible neural correlates of the meta-module of pragmatic meaning construction. Journal of Pragmatics, 2016, vol. 92, pp. 74–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.004
  12. Bais L., Liemburg E., Vercammen A., Bruggeman R., Knegtering H., Aleman A. Effects of low frequency rTMS treatment on brain networks for inner speech in patients with schizophrenia and auditory verbal hallucinations. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 2017, vol. 78, pp. 105–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.04.017
  13. Perona-Garcelán S., Bellido-Zanin G., Senín-Calderón C., López-Jiménez A. M., Rodríguez-Testal J. F. Spanish adaptation of the Varieties of Inner Speech Questionnaire (VISQ). Study of the relationship between inner speech, dissociation, and hallucination proneness. Clínica y Salud, 2017, vol. 28, issue 2, pp. 93–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clysa.2017.02.001
  14. Sokolov A. N. Inner speech and thinking. Moscow, URSS Publ., 2007, 248 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20094536 
  15. Narodova E. A., Narodova V. V., Izotova O. M. Study of internal speech in patients with motor aphasia in the acute phase of the brain stroke by records of tongue micro articulations. Siberian Medical Review, 2011, no. 2, pp. 26–30. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=16376905
  16. Narodova E. A., Prokopenko S. V., Narodova V. V., Narodov A. A. Study of Inner Speech by Means of Language Microarticulation Registration in the Healthy Patients. Journal of New Medical Technologies, 2012, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 73–75. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18267144 
  17. Kühn S., Fernyhough C., Alderson-Day B., Hurlburt R. T. Inner experience in the scanner: can high fidelity apprehensions of inner experience be integrated with fMRI?. Frontiers in Psychology, 2014, vol. 5, pp. 1393. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01393
  18. Pogrebnyak Y. U. Interior discourse as a model of inner speech of a character in a work of fiction. Bulletin of Irkutsk state linguistic University, 2012, no. 2, pp. 207–212. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17899216
  19. Pogrebnyak Y. U. Psychological Functions of Interior Discourse.Bulletin of Pushkin Leningrad State University, 2011, no. 2, pp. 199–206. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17849030
  20. Pogrebnyak Y. U. Fiction functions of the interiorized discourse. News of Volgograd State Pedagogical University, 2012, no. 6, pp. 50–54. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17870803
  21. Heavey C. L., Hurlburt R. T. The phenomena of inner experience. Consciousness and Cognition, 2008, vol. 17, issue 3, pp. 798–810. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.12.006
  22. Hurlburt R. T., Heavey C. L. Investigating pristine inner experience: Implications for experience sampling and questionnaires. Consciousness and Cognition, 2015, vol. 31, pp. 148–159. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.11.002
  23. Hurlburt R. T., Heavey C. L., Kelsey J. M. Toward a phenomenology of inner speaking. Consciousness and Cognition, 2013, vol. 22, issue 4, pp. 1477–1494. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.10.003
  24. McCarthy-Jones S., Fernyhough C. The varieties of inner speech: Links between quality of inner speech and psychopathological variables in a sample of young adults. Consciousness and Cognition, 2011, vol. 20, issue 4, pp. 1586–1593. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.005
  25. Alderson-Day B., Weis S., McCarthy-Jones S., Moseley P., Smailes D., Fernyhough C. The brain’s conversation with itself: neural substrates of dialogic inner speech. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2016, vol. 11, issue 1, pp. 110–120. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv094
  26. Calvete E., Estévez A., Landín C., Martínez Y., Cardeñoso O., Villardón L., Villa A. Self-talk and affective problems in college students: Valence of thinking and cognitive content specificity. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 2005, vol. 8, issue 1, pp. 56–67. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600004960
  27. Alderson-Day B., McCarthy-Jones S., Bedford S., Collins H., Dunne H., Rooke C., Fernyhough C. Shot through with voices: Dissociation mediates the relationship between varieties of inner speech and auditory hallucination proneness. Consciousness and Cognition, 2014, vol. 27, pp. 288–296. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.05.010
  28. Hatzigeorgiadis A., Zourbanos N., Mpoumpaki S., Theodorakis Y. Mechanisms underlying the self-talk–performance relationship: The effects of motivational self-talk on self-confidence and anxiety. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2009, vol. 10, issue 1, pp. 186–192. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.07.009
  29. Brown T. C., Latham G. P. The effect of training in verbal self-guidance on performance effectiveness in a MBA program. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 2006, vol. 38 (1), pp. 1–11. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0087266
  30. Oliver E. J., Markland D., Hardy J. Interpretation of self-talk and post-lecture affective states of higher education students: A self-determination theory perspective. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2010, vol. 80, issue 2, pp. 307–323. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709909X477215
  31. Dolcos S., Albarracín D. The inner speech of behavioral regulation: Intentions and task performance strengthen when you talk to yourself as a you. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2014, vol. 44, issue 6, pp. 636–642. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2048
  32. Morin A. Self-Awareness Part 2: Neuroanatomy and Importance of Inner Speech. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2011, vol. 5, issue 12, pp. 1004–1017. DOI: http://doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00410.x
  33. Morin A., Uttl B., Hamper B. Self-reported frequency, content, and functions of inner speech. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2011, vol. 30, pp. 1714–1718. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.331  
Date of the publication 31.08.2018