Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 41–57
UDC: 
37.04+371.213.3+376.545

Implementation of mentoring programs for gifted and talented children and youth (an international perspective)

Dudina E. A. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
1 Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article studies mentoring as a specialized form of individual educational support and guidance of gifted and talented students whose special needs cannot be met in schools. The purpose of the research is to summarize the main aspects of developing and implementing mentoring programs for gifted and talented students in foreign countries.
Materials and Methods. The research methods include an analysis of mentoring programs for gifted and talented children and youth in foreign countries based on a range of theoretical works by foreign and Russian scholars and research reports of practitioners, generalization and systematization of obtained data.
Results. The research reveals interdisciplinary and interinstitutional approach to development and implementation of mentoring programs for gifted and talented children and youth in foreign countries. The author introduces classification of mentoring programs according to the types of participating gifted students: developmental mentoring programs aimed at successful gifted children and youth and remedial mentoring programs for challenging types of gifted students (underachieving, twice exceptional, underrepresented, etc.). The author argues that specific features of mentoring programs for gifted students depend on their age. Mentoring programs for primary schoolchildren and young adolescents focus on engaging them in a topic or domain and developing the needed skills, knowledge, and values. Mentoring programs for high school-age gifted students deal with talent differentiation, career choice and career goal clarification.
Conclusions. The author has summarized international experience of developing and implementing mentoring programs aimed at meeting special educational, social and emotional needs of gifted and talented children and youth. Specific features of developing and implementing mentoring programs for gifted and talented children and youth in foreign countries have been identified.

Keywords: 

Mentoring; Mentor; Mentoring programs; Gifted children and youth; Formal mentoring; Informal mentoring; Developmental mentoring programs; Remedial mentoring programs

90.344 Gifted | Talent Development | School Districts

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?src=s&origin=cto&ctoId=CTODS_1...

Implementation of mentoring programs for gifted and talented children and youth (an international perspective)

For citation:
Dudina E. A. Implementation of mentoring programs for gifted and talented children and youth (an international perspective). Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 41–57. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1806.03
References: 
  1. Besnoy K. D., McDaniel S. C. Going up in dreams and esteem: Cross-age mentoring to promote leadership skills in high school-age gifted students. Gifted Child Today, 2016, vol. 39, issue 1, pp. 18–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217515613386  
  2. Casey K. M. A., Shore B. M. Mentors’ contributions to gifted adolescents’ affective, social, and vocational development. Roeper Review, 2000, vol. 22, issue 4, pp. 227–230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190009554043
  3. Clasen D. R., Hanson M. Double mentoring: A process for facilitating mentorships for gifted students. Roeper Review, 1987, vol. 10, issue 2, pp. 107–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02783198709553096  
  4. Davalos R. A., Haensly P. A. After the dust has settled: Youth reflect on their high school mentored research experience. Roeper Review, 1997, vol. 19, issue 4, pp. 204–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199709553830  
  5. Donlan A. E., McDermott E. R., Zaff J. F. Building relationships between mentors and youth: Development of the TRICS model. Children and Youth Services Review, 2017, vol. 79, pp. 385–398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.044  
  6. Dutton H., Deane K. L., Bullen P. Distal and experiential perspectives of relationship quality from mentors, mentees, and program staff in a school-based youth mentoring program. Children and Youth Services Review, 2018, vol. 85, pp. 53–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.12.008  
  7. Ecker-Lyster M., Niileksela C. Enhancing gifted education for underrepresented students: Promising recruitment and programming strategies. Journal for Education of Gifted, 2017, vol.  40, issue 1, pp. 79–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353216686216  
  8. Gagné F. Transforming gifts into talents: the DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studies, 2004, vol. 15, issue 2, pp. 119–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813042000314682  
  9. Gagne F. Motivation within the DMGT 2.0 framework. High Ability Studies, 2010, vol. 21, issue  2, pp. 81–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2010.525341
  10. Grassinger P., Porath M., Ziegler A. Mentoring the gifted: A conceptual analysis. High Ability Studies, 2010, vol. 21 (1), pp. 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2010.488087
  11. Haber-Curran P., Everman D., Martinez M. A. Mentors’ personal growth and development in a college access mentorship program. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 2017, vol. 25, issue 4, pp. 485–503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2017.1403558  
  12. Kaufman F. A., Harrel G., Milam C. P., Woolverton N., Miller J. The nature role and influence of mentors in the lives of gifted adults. Journal of Counselling and Development, 1986, vol. 64, issue 9, pp. 576–578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1986.tb01208.x  
  13. Kaul C. R., Johnsen S. K., Saxon T. F., Witte M. M. Project promise: A long-term follow-up of low-income gifted students who participated in a summer enrichment program. Journal for Education of Gifted, 2016, vol. 39, issue 2, pp. 83–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353216640938
  14. Lim T. K. Nurturing giftedness through the mentor‐link programme. High Ability Studies, 1996, vol. 7, issue 2, pp. 169–177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0937445960070207  
  15. Menges C. Toward improving the effectiveness of formal mentoring programs: Matching by personality matters. Group and Organization Management, 2016, vol. 41 (1), pp. 98–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115579567
  16. Peralta L., Cinelli R., Bennie A. Mentoring as a tool to engage Aboriginal youth in remote Australian communities: a qualitative investigation of community members, mentees, teachers, and mentors’ perspectives. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 2018, vol. 26, issue 1, pp. 30–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2018.1445436  
  17. Pleiss M. K., Feldhusen J. F. Mentors, role models, and heroes in the lives of gifted children. Educational Psychologist, 1995, vol. 30, issue 3, pp. 159–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3003_6  
  18. Rogers A., Luksyte A., Spitzmueller C. Predictors of effective formal mentoring: Is the mentor’s commitment all that matters? Human Performance, 2016, vol. 29, issue 3, pp. 209–225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2016.1148035  
  19. Sternberg R. J. WICS as a model of giftedness. High Ability Studies, 2003, vol. 14, issue 2, pp. 109–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813032000163807  
  20. Stoeger H., Hopp M., Ziegler A. Online mentoring as an extracurricular measure to encourage talented girls in stem (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics): An empirical study of one-on-one versus group mentoring. Gifted Child Quarterly, 2017, vol. 61, issue 3, pp. 239–249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217702215
  21. Subotnik R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius P., Worrell F. C. Rethinking giftedness and gifted education. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2011, vol. 12, issue 1, pp. 3–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056  
  22. Vance E. A., Tanenbaum E., Kaur A., Otto M. C., Morris R. An eight-step guide to creating and sustaining a mentoring program. American Statistician, 2017, vol. 71, issue 1, pp. 23–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1251493  
  23. Zorman R., Rachmel Sh., Bashan Z. The national mentoring program in Israel – Challenges and achievement. Gifted Education International, 2016, vol. 32 (2), pp. 173–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429414560667  
  24. Yurkevich V. S. Gifted children: Intellectual and creative potential of the society. Psychological Science and Education, 2009, no. 4, pp. 74–86. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=12991706
Date of the publication 31.12.2018