Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 55–66
UDC: 
159.97 + 378

The analysis of suicide risk factors among students of higher education institutions

Klimov V. M. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation), Aizman R. I. 2 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
1 Novosibirsk State Technical University
2 Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Abstract: 

Introduction. The problem of studying and prevention of suicide behavior risk among undergraduate students in the conditions of economic instability, growth of social changes, and political crisis is significant, because of age-specific features characterized by tendency towards introspection and continual self-examination, and increasing negative attitude to the world. They are accompanied by students’ disadaptation to university studies, changes in their social status and educational difficulties. The purpose of the article is to reveal the tendency to suicide behavior among students of a technical university and to identify determining factors of a presuicide state.
Materials and Methods. Studying gender characteristics of suicide behavior has been carried out by means of the following techniques: the test for revealing the tendency towards suicide behavior (based on M. V. Gorskya’s technique) and the questionnaire of suicide risk by A. G. Shmelev (updated by T. N. Razuvaeva's). 175 students of Novosibirsk Technical University aged between 16 and 19 have participated in the study.
Results. It is established, that emotional and social factors play an essential role in displaying suicide behavior. Correlation and regression analysis has identified such factors as affectivity and social pessimism, which have the greatest influence on risk of suicide behavior, both among young males and females. The gender differences consisting in more expressed tendency to risk of suicide behavior among young females in comparison with young males is caused by their higher level of a psychoemotional pressure (anxiety and frustration). Both diagnostic techniques of suicide behavior by A. G. Shmelev (in Razuvaeva's updating) and M. V. Gorskya, provide an opportunity to estimate suicide risk. But the first technique focuses on a wider range of suicide signs (emotional, social, intellectual) whereas the analysis of suicide risk by the second technique deals with the characteristics of emotional states.
Conclusions. The analysis of the received data testifies a low risk level of suicide fulfilment by students that corresponds to statistical data. However, females, in comparison with males, have higher level of suicide risk as a result of higher affectivities, social pessimism, anxiety and frustration. Two basic groups of factors determine the threat of a suicide risk: emotional (affectivity) and social (inconsistency and social pessimism). Comparative analysis of two different diagnostic techniques of a presuicide state has revealed, that the questionnaire by A. G. Shmelev (in T. N. Razuvaeva's updating) is more informative in identifying the value of some factors influencing the risk of its display.

Keywords: 

Students; Suicide behavior; Suicide risk; Risk factors for suicidal behavior; Gender differences; Correlation analysis

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?src=s&origin=cto&ctoId=CTODS_1...

The analysis of suicide risk factors among students of higher education institutions

For citation:
Klimov V. M., Aizman R. I. The analysis of suicide risk factors among students of higher education institutions. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 55–66. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1705.04
References: 
  1. Beck A. T., Steer R. A., Kovacs M., Garrison B. Hopelessness and eventual suicide: A 10-year prospective study of patients hospitalized with suicidal ideation. American Journal Psychiatry, 1985, vol. 142 (5), pp. 559–563. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/ajp.142.5.559
  2. Bridge J. A., Golstein T. R., Brent D. A. Adolescent suicide and suicidal behavior. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2006, vol. 47 (3-4), pp. 372–394. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01615.x
  3. Cheng Q., Li T. M., Kwok C. L., Zhu T. assessing suicide risk and emotional distress in chinese social media: A text mining and machine learning study. J Med Internet Res, 2017, vol. 19 (7), pp. e243. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7276
  4. Ganz D., Braquehais M. D., Sher L. Secondary prevention of suicide. PLoS Med, 2010, vol. 7 (6), pp. e1000271. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000271
  5. Hendin H.Psychodynamics of suicide, with particular reference to the young. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1991, vol. 148 (9), pp. 1150–1158. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/ajp.148.9.1150 
  6. Im Y., Won-Oak Oh, Suk M. Risk factors for suicide ideation among adolescents: Five-Year National Data Analysis. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 2017, vol. 31 (3), pp. 282–286. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2017.01.001  
  7. Lv M., Li A., Liu T., Zhu T. Creating a Chinese suicide dictionary for identifying suicide risk on social media. Peer J, 2015, vol. 3, pp. e1455. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1455
  8. McGee R., Williams S., Nada-Raja S. Low self-esteem and hopelessness in childhood and suicidal ideation in early adulthood. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 2001, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 281–291. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=802879
  9. Page R. M., Yanagishita J., Suwanteerangkul J., Zarco E. P., Ching Mei-Lee, Nae-Fang Miao. Hopelessness and loneliness among suicide attempters in school-based samples of Taiwanese, Philippine and Thai adolescents. School Psychology International, 2006, vol. 27 (5), pp. 583–598. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228644817_Hopelessness_and_Loneliness_Among_Suicide_Attempters_in_School-Based_Samples_of_Taiwanese_Philippine_and_Thai_Adolescents
  10. Randell B. P., Eggert L. L., Pike K. C. Immediate post intervention effects of two brief suicide prevention interventions. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 2001, vol. 31 (1), pp. 41–61. http://www.ebppc.hawaii.edu/Resources/C-CARE_2001.pdf
  11. Steele I. H., Thrower N., Noroian P., Saleh F. M. Understanding suicide across the lifespan: A  united states perspective of suicide risk factors, assessment & management. J Forensic Sci, 2017. Early View. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13519  
  12. Tan L., Xia T., Reece C. Social and individual risk factors for suicide ideation among Chinese children and adolescents: A multilevel analysis. Int. J. Psychol., 2016. Early View. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12273
  13. Vianello M., Schnabl K., Sriram N., Nosek B. Gender differences in implicit and explicit personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 2013, vol. 55, pp. 994–999. URL: http://projectimplicit.net/nosek/papers/VSSN2013.pdf 
  14. Abdulova I. G., Dolenko G. N. Teaching methods for elimination of consequences of deprivation of children and adolescents. Journal of Pedagogical Innovations, 2015, no. 2, pp. 102-109. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25085216
  15. Bannikov G. S., Pavlova T. S., Vikhristyuk O. V. Screening diagnostics of antivital experiences and propensity toward impulsive, autoagressive behavior in adolescents (preliminary results). Psychological-Educational Studies, 2014, no. 1, pp. 126–145. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21593401
  16. Vagin Yu. R. The roots of suicidal activity. Suicide-studying, 2011, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 3-10. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17473564  
  17. Vasil'eva L. N., Shhepetkova S. S. About suicidal risks of medical students. Historical and Social-Educational Ideas, 2015, vol. 7, no 3, pp. 179–183. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17748/2075-9908.2015.7.3.179-183
  18. Gabdreeva G. Gender Differencies in adaptability as a personality trait. Philology and Culture, 2016, no 1, pp. 338–347. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25924514  
  19. Ignatenko O. E. Psychological training as a means of forming ability to forgive in adolescents with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Pedagogical Innovations, 2016, no. 2, pp.114-119. (In Russian)  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26202662
  20. Kirikov A. A. Deviant behavior as the result of a combination of biological, psychological and social factors. Azimuth of Research: Pedagogy and Psychology, 2016, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 354-357. (In Russian)  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28139600
  21. Razumnikova O. M. Relationship between intelligence, personality traits and creativity in mathematics and humanists students. Psychological Journal, 2016, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 69–78. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25846728
  22.  Syrokvashina K. V., Dozorceva E. G. psychological factors of risk of suicidal behavior in adolescents. Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 2016, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 8–24. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26703383
Date of the publication 31.10.2017