Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 186–195

Phrasal verbs: the problem of misunderstanding or knowledge systematization [In English]

Borodina T. L. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
1 Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University

Introduction. The author highlights analyticism in Modern English verb building system which is of no less typological relevance than in word changing verb paradigms. Since verbal lexemes such as ‘get down’, ‘take off’ are taught in terms of phrasal verbs, they remain a cornerstone for Russian learners of English. Typological peculiarities of such linguistic units allow the researcher to interpret them in the terms of analytical verb-adverb lexemes featuring their functional load in the sphere of naming actions together with their spacial characteristics.
Material and Methods. The methods employed in the current research are based on functional-systemic and cognitive analysis. That makes it possible for the author to introduce verb-adverb lexemes as a system with a cognitive code.
Results. Based on the results achieved the author argues in favour of a limited number of models of verb-adverb lexemes, productivity of which depends on the adverb – an obligatory constituent of the lexeme: V+Up, V+Down, V+In, V+Out etc. Each model possesses its own basic abstract meaning, conditioned by the direct spacial meaning of an adverb. The author also points out semantic shifts each model undergoes that generate the model’s polysemy.
Conclusion. The author emphasizes the importance of such systematization of the knowledge each model is coined to express, which is helpful in both teaching English and studying it.

For citation:
Borodina T. L. Phrasal verbs: the problem of misunderstanding or knowledge systematization [In English]. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 186–195. DOI:
  1. Akbary M., Shahriari H., Fatemi Hosseini A. The value of song lyrics for teaching and learning English phrasal verbs: a corpus investigation of four music genres. Journal: Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 2016, pp. 1–13. DOI:
  2. Allan Q. Delexical verbs and degrees of desemanticization. WORD, 1998, vol. 49, issue 1, pp. 1–17. DOI:  
  3. Armstrong K. Sexing up the dossier: A semantic analysis of phrasal verbs for language teachers. Language Awareness, 2004, vol. 13, issue 4, pp. 213–224. DOI:
  4. Beedham Ch. Irregularity in language: Saussure versus Chomsky versus Pinker. WORD, 2002, vol. 53, issue 3, pp. 341–367. DOI:  
  5. Collins P., Yao X. Grammatical change in the verb phrase in Australian English: A Corpus-based Study. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 2014, vol. 34, issue 4, pp. 506–523. DOI:  
  6. Consigny A. The polysemy (?) of phrasal verbs in English. WORD, 2006, vol. 57, issue 1, pp. 1–25. DOI:
  7. Diemer S. Phrasal verbs: The English verb-particle construction and its history. English Studies, 2015, vol. 96, issue 3, pp. 360–362. DOI:   
  8. Dixon R. M. W. The grammar of English phrasal verbs. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 1982, vol. 2, issue 1, pp. 1–42. DOI:  
  9. Giannakis G. The tense-aspect system of the Indo-European verb. WORD, 1993, vol. 44, issue 3, pp. 485–495. DOI:  
  10.  Gilquin G. The use of phrasal verbs by French-speaking EFL learners. A constructional and collostructional corpus-based approach. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 2015, vol. 11, issue 1, pp. 51–88. DOI:
  11. Hilpert M. Stefan Thim. Phrasal verbs: The English verb-particle construction and its history.  Anglia. Journal of English Philology, 2014, vol. 132, issue 2, pp. 374–378. DOI:
  12. Josephson F. Grammaticalization paths of verbal prefixes in Slavic and other Indo-european branches. Scando-Slavica, 2015, vol. 61, issue 2, pp. 283–292. DOI:
  13.  Khoroshilova S. A short survey of approaches to classify the tendencies in the pronunciation standard of Great Britain (RP). The International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Researches, 2011, no. 10, pp. 58–59. (In Russian) URL:  
  14. Leone L. Phrasal verbs and analogical generalization in late modern spoken English. ICAME Journal, 2016, vol. 40, issue 1, pp 39–62. DOI:
  15. Mart C. T. How to teach phrasal verbs. English language Teaching, 2012, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 114–118. DOI:  
  16. Matsumoto M. The verbs have and take in composite predicates and phrasal verbs. Studia Neophilologica, 2007, vol. 79, issue 2, pp. 159–170. DOI: 
  17. Moser A. From Aktionsart to aspect: Grammaticalization and subjectification in Greek. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia. International Journal of Lnguistics, 2014, vol. 46, issue 1, pp. 64–84. DOI:  
  18. Rijkhoff J. When can a language have nouns and verbs? Acta Linguistica Hafniensia. International Journal of Lnguistics, 2003, vol. 35, issue 1, pp. 7–38. DOI:
  19. Rodríguez-Puente P. The development of non-compositional meanings in phrasal verbs: A corpus-based study. English Studies, 2012, vol. 93, issue 1, pp. 71–90. DOI:
  20. Rottet K. J. Phrasal verbs and English influence in Welsh. WORD, 2005, vol. 56, issue 1, pp. 39–70. DOI:   
  21. Sansome R. applying lexical research to the teaching of phrasal verbs.  International Review of Applied Linguistics in language Teaching, 2000, vol. 38, issue 1, pp. 59–70. DOI:
  22. Smith K. Aaron. And we dare not write anymore than that which Latin has: Ælfric’s Grammar and the history of the simplified description of the English verbal system. Language and History, 2016, vol. 59, issue 2, pp. 98–111. DOI: 
  23. Torres-Martinez S. Working out multiword verbs within an applied cognitive construction grammar framework. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2017, vol. 5, issue 1, pp. 55–86. DOI:
  24. Valentini C. Phrasal verbs in Italian dubbed dialogues: a multimedia corpus-based study. Perspectives. Studies in Translation Theory and Practice, 2013, vol. 21, issue 4, pp. 543–562. DOI:
  25. Van Olmen D., Cuyckens H. Grammaticalization and (inter)subjectification. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia. International Journal of Lnguistics, 2014, vol. 46, issue 1, pp. 1–6. DOI:
Date of the publication 31.08.2017