Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 54–70
© Soboleva E. V., Karavaev N. L., Perevozchikova S. M., 2017
UDC: 
371.134:004(07)

Improving the content of teacher training for the development and application of computer games in learning process

Soboleva E. V. 1 (Kirov, Russian Federation), Karavaev N. L. 1 (Kirov, Russian Federation), Perevozchikova S. M. 1 (Kirov, Russian Federation)
1 Vyatka State University
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 5137
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article is devoted to solving the methodological problems associated with teacher training for planning and gamification of learning processes within information-based educational environments, taking into account the problems and needs of the society, new trends in the field of professional skills and needs of modern schoolchildren. The purpose of the article is to describe, on the basis of the analysis and generalization of methodological and scientific studies and experimental evaluation of the use of game-based learning technologies, the didactic features of teacher training aimed at using and creating games in educational and extracurricular activities.
Materials and Methods. The methodology of work is based on the study of the results of psychological, educational, methodological and technical research investigations, as well as, on analysis of the computer educational games of foreign and domestic authors. The research methods include student surveys, analysis of scientific literature, and analysis of learning outcomes.
Results. Firstly, the paper clarifies the conceptual basis of the learning process gamification methodology (game, gamification, game-based practice, game pedagogy). Secondly, the experimental work on formation of prospective teachers’ competences in using and creating game elements in educational and extracurricular activities with the main focus on the Scratch environment is analyzed. The specific challenges facing teachers in the acquisition of knowledge, tools and methodology of gamification of the educational process are highlighted. Thirdly, the methodological characteristics of teachers mastering the basic theoretical knowledge and practical skills in creating simple games and developing game-based practice are described.
Conclusions. In conclusion, the authors emphasize the need to move away from standard teaching templates, based on the requirements of modern schoolchildren, and propose the new approach to organizing learning environments according to the requirements and challenges of the society, the state, and modern education. Effective using of game-based technology in education is based on teacher training carried out in the context of solving tasks related to the main areas of their professional activities.

Keywords: 

Gamification of learning; Challenges the education system; Pedagogic of game; Game-based practice; Teacher training; Professional activity; Scratch

99.383 Gamification | Game Design | Game-Based Learning

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?src=s&origin=cto&ctoId=CTODS_1...

Improving the content of teacher training for the development and application of computer games in learning process

For citation:
Soboleva E. V., Karavaev N. L., Perevozchikova S. M. Improving the content of teacher training for the development and application of computer games in learning process. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 54–70. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1706.04
References: 
  1. Borisenko I. G., Yatsenko M. P., Chernykh S. I. Information Policy in The Education System as a Reflection of The Society Problems. Philosophy of Education, 2016, no. 1, pp. 51–60. (In Russian) DOI: http://doi.org/10.15372/PHE20160105
  2. Varenina L. P. Gamification in Education. Historical and Social Educational Idea, 2014, vol. 6, no. 6–2 (28), pp. 314–317. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22981456  
  3. Vigotskiy L.S. The game and its role in the mental development of the child. Almanac Institute of Special Education, 2017, no. 28, pp. 1–33. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28925332  
  4. Oleynik Y. P Gamification in Education: Toward Definition. Modern problems of science and education, 2015, no 3, p. 476. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23703904  
  5. Orlova O. V., Titova V. N. Gamification as a Way of Learning Organization. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2015, no. 9, pp. 60–64. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24309337
  6. Potaturov V. A. Informatization of Education as a Cultural Issue. Man and Culture, 2015, no. 3, pp. 1–40. (In Russian) DOI: http://doi.org/10.7256/2409-8744.2015.3.15247
  7. Ursul A. D., Ursul T. A. Education for Sustainable Development: The First Results, Problems and Prospects. Sociodynamics, 2015, no. 1, pp. 11–74. (In Russian) DOI: http://doi.org/10.7256/2409-7144.2015.1.14001
  8. Elkonin D. B. Game and mental development. Almanac Institute of Special Education, 2017, no. 28, pp. 32–66. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28925333
  9. Attali Y., Arieli-Attali M. Gamification in assessment: Do points affect test performance? Computers & Education, 2015, vol. 83, pp. 57–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.012
  10. Barnett L. A. Developmental benefits of play for children. Journal of Leisure Research, 1990, no. 22, pp. 138–153. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232469836_Developmental_benefits_of_play_for_children
  11. Blasi M., Hurwitz S. C., Hurwitz S. C. For Parents Particularly: To Be Successful–Let Them Play!. Childhood Education, 2002, vol. 79, no 2, pp. 101–102. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2003.10522779
  12. Bradbury N. A. Attention span during lectures: 8 seconds, 10 minutes, or more?. Advances in Physiology Education, 2016, vol. 40, no 4, pp. 509–513. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00109.2016
  13. Bunce D. M., Flens E. A., Neiles K. Y. How Long Can Students Pay Attention in Class? A Study of Student Attention Decline Using Clickers. Journal of Chemical Education, 2010, vol. 87, no. 12, pp. 1438–1443. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1021/ed100409p
  14. Chai Ch. S., Koh E., Lim Ch. P., Tsai Ch.-Ch. Deepening ICT integration through multilevel design of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Computers in Education, 2014, vol. 1, issue 1, pp. 1–17. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-014-0002-1
  15. Dasgupta S., Resnick M. Engaging novices in programming, experimenting, and learning with data. ACM Inroads, 2014, vol. 5, issue 4, pp. 72–75.  DOI: http://doi.org/10.1145/2684721.2684737
  16. Faiella F., Ricciardi M. Gamification and learning: a review of issues and research. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 2015, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 13–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1072
  17. Ifenthaler D., Adcock A. B., Erlandson B. E. Challenges for Education in a Connected World: Digital Learning, Data Rich Environments, and Computer-Based Assessment–Introduction to the Inaugural Special Issue of Technology, Knowledge and Learning. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 2014, vol. 19, issue 1–2, pp. 121–126.  DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-014-9228-2
  18. Isenberg J., Quisenberry N. L. Play: A Necessity for all Children. Childhood Education, 1988, vol. 64, issue 3, pp. 138–145.  DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.1988.10521522
  19. Kaatrakoski H., Littlejohn A., Hood N. Learning challenges in higher education: an analysis of contradictions within Open Educational Practice. Higher Education, 2017, vol. 74, issue 4, pp. 599–615. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0067-z
  20. Koh J. H. L., Chai C. S., Benjamin W. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) and Design Thinking: A Framework to Support ICT Lesson Design for 21st Century Learning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 2015, vol. 24, issue 3, pp. 535–543. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0237-2
  21. McVey M. Changing spaces of education: New perspectives on the nature of learning. International Review of Education, 2013, vol. 59, issue 6, pp. 805–807. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-013-9394-9
  22. Proske A., Roscoe R. D., McNamara D. S. Game-based practice versus traditional practice in computer-based writing strategy training: effects on motivation and achievement. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2014, vol. 62, issue 5, pp. 481–505. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9349-2  
  23. Rabah J. Benefits and Challenges of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) Integration in Québec English Schools. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2015, vol. 14, issue 2, pp. 24–31. URL: http://tojet.net/articles/v14i2/1424.pdf
  24. Sutton-Smith B. The ambiguity of play. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard Univ. Press Publ., 2001, 276 p. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=The%20ambiguity%20of%20play&author=B.%20Sutton-Smith&publication_year=2001
  25. Werfhorst H. G. van de Changing societies and four tasks of schooling: Challenges for strongly differentiated educational systems. International Review of Education, 2014, vol. 60, issue 1, pp. 123–144. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-014-9410-8
Date of the publication 30.12.2017