Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 40–51
© Kuzminykh I. A., Khoroshilova S. P., 2017
UDC: 
372.016 + 811.111’342

Investigating the impact of corpus-based classroom activities in English phonetics classes on students’ academic progress [In English]

Kuzminykh I. A. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation), Khoroshilova S. P. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
1 Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 3388
Abstract: 

Introduction. The paper introduces the results of an educational research project, aiming at the evaluation of the impact of the use of corpus-based set of classroom activities on students’ academic progress in English phonetics classes and their motivation to study English pronunciation. Consequently, the research objective was to find out the effectiveness of a corpus-based method of instruction compared to a traditional teacher-centered approach and to evaluate the impact of the use of corpora-based classroom activities during the input of a new material on students’ motivation to study phonetics.
Materials and Methods. The methods employed in the current research combined a questionnaire study and a pre-, and a post-test. The evaluation of the significance of differences in the test results of the two groups was done using chi-square analysis. The participants were two groups of the second-year students of the Faculty of Foreign Languages at Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University who were doing a practical phonetics course at the time of the experiment.
Results. The corpus-based method in teaching was developed mainly for grammar and vocabulary acquisition and no data was found about the research aimed at the impact of these activities on the learners’ pronunciation level. The designed corpus-based classroom activities explored English connected speech processes such as elision and assimilation. The attained results testify that a corpus-based method of instruction happened to be more effective than a traditional teacher-centered approach in introduction of the new material in the class of phonetics. The difference in pre-test and post-test results in the experimental group proved to be statistically significant, while in the control group the results appeared statistically insignificant. In addition, there was statistically significant difference found between the post-test results from the two teaching approaches. According to the questionnaire data, the application of corpora in the classroom had a positive impact on the students as it revived their interest and motivation in the process of learning pronunciation.
Conclusions. Corpus-based classroom approach proved to be one of the alternatives to the traditional ways of teaching pronunciation, which allows to consider corpora a perspective technology to be integrated into the academic environment in Russian university context. The results of the research demonstrated a positive impact of the use of corpus-based classroom activities on students’ academic progress in English phonetics classes as well as their motivation level.

Keywords: 

Corpus-based approach; Linguistic corpus; Phonetics; Information and communication technology; Teaching; Foreign language; Effectiveness; Academic progress; Motivation

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?src=s&origin=cto&ctoId=CTODS_1...

Investigating the impact of corpus-based classroom activities in English phonetics classes on students' academic progress

For citation:
Kuzminykh I. A., Khoroshilova S. P. Investigating the impact of corpus-based classroom activities in English phonetics classes on students’ academic progress [In English]. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 40–51. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1704.03
References: 
  1. Anderson W., Corbett J. Exploring English with Online Corpora. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan,2009. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Exploring%20English%20with%20Online%20Corpora%3A%20An%20Introduction&author=W.%20Anderson&author=J.%20Corbett&publication_year=2009
  2. Bale R. An evaluation of spoken corpus-based resources in undergraduate interpreter training. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2015, vol. 25, issue 1, pp. 23–45. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12036
  3. Bardovi-Harlig K., Mossman S., Vellenga H. E. Developing corpus-based materials to teach pragmatic routines. TESOL J, 2015, vol. 6, issue 3, pp. 499–526. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tesj.177
  4. Benavides C. Using a Corpus in a 300-level spanish grammar course. Foreign Language Annals, 2015, vol. 48, issue 2, pp. 218–235. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/flan.12136
  5. Cem Odacıoglu M., Kokturk S. The effects of technology on translation students in academic translation teaching. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 197, pp. 1085–1094. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.349
  6. Conrad S. Will corpus linguistics revolutionize grammar teaching in the 21st century? TESOL Quarterly, 2010, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 548–560. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3587743
  7. Elmgrab R. A. Implication for translation teaching pedagogy: A case of Benghazi University. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, vol. 70, pp. 358–369. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.073
  8. Huang L.-S. Has corpus-based instruction reached a tipping point? Practical applications and pointers for teachers. TESOL J., 2016, vol. 8, issue 2, pp. 295–313. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tesj.271
  9. Gablasova D., Brezina V., McEnery T. Collocations in corpus-based language learning research: Identifying, comparing, and interpreting the evidence. Language Learning, 2017. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lang.12225
  10. Lin M. H. Effects of corpus-aided language learning in the EFL grammar classroom: A case study of students' learning attitudes and teachers' perceptions in Taiwan. TESOL Q, 2016, vol. 50, issue 4, pp. 871–893. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tesq.250 
  11. Mat Awal N., Ho-Abdullah I., Safinaz Zainudin I. Parallel corpus as a tool in teaching translation: Translating English phrasal verbs into Malay. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, vol. 112, pp. 882–887. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1245
  12. McCarthy M., Carter R. Size isn't everything: spoken English, corpus, and the classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 2001, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 337–340. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3587654
  13. Okamoto M. Is corpus word frequency a good yardstick for selecting words to teach? Threshold levels for vocabulary selection. System, 2015, vol. 51, pp. 1–10. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.03.004
  14. O'Keeffe A., Farr F. Using language corpora in initial teacher education: Pedagogic issues and practical applications. TESOL Quarterly, 2003, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 389–418. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3588397
  15.  Periñán-Pascual C.,  Mestre-Mestre E. M. DEXTER: Automatic extraction of domain-specific glossaries for language teaching. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 198, pp. 377–385 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.457
  16. Samburskiy D. Corpus-informed pedagogical grammar of English: Pros and cons. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, vol. 154, pp. 263–267. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.148
  17. Soruç E. Y. A. The use of concordance for teaching vocabulary: A data-driven learning approach. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 191, pp. 2626–2630. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.400 
  18. Stoykova V. Teaching corpus linguistics. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, vol. 143, pp. 437–441. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.513
  19. Sysoyev P. V., Evstigneev M. N. Foreign language teachers' competency and competence in using information and communication technologies. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, vol. 154, pp. 82–86. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.116
  20. Zaki M.  Corpus-based teaching in the Arabic classroom: theoretical and practical perspectives. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12159
  21. Borodina T. L. Problems of introducing the results of the students’ linguistic researches for pedagogics to ESL teaching. Siberian Pedagogical Journal, 2013, no. 5, pp. 243–245. (In Russian). URL: http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20805905
  22. Deryabina I. V. Characteristics of British national corpus teaching. Tambov University Bulletin. Humanities Series, 2012, no. 9, pp. 156–160. (In Russian). URL: http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17975753
  23. Sysoev P.V. Computerization of teaching languages: major ways and perspectives (ending). Foreign Languages at School, 2012, no. 3, pp. 2–9. (In Russian). URL: http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17671328
  24. Chernyakova T. A. Methodological conditions for development of lexical skills via language corpus. Tambov University Bulletin. Humanities Series, 2012, no. 3, pp. 122–126. (In Russian). URL: http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17586329
  25. Khoroshilova S. P., Ovechkina J. A. Corpus-based classroom activities in English phonetics classes and students' academic progress. International Journal of Experimental Education, 2016, no. 5-1, pp. 46–49. (In Russian).  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25848718
Date of the publication 31.08.2017