| 
User login
Inclusive education as a systemic innovation
Introduction. The article examines the signs of systemic innovation the example of the introduction of inclusive practices in modern conditions of modernization of Russian education. The purpose of this article is based on the study of scientific-theoretical sources and the analysis and synthesis of innovative practices to substantiate the traits of a systemic innovation in inclusive education.
Materials and Methods. The methodology of the article are legal documents in the field of education, reference and textbooks, nonfiction materials, as well as the work of foreign and domestic scientists, the credibility and scientific reputation which are recognized by the scientific community, and the prominence achieved high level research in the field of inclusive education.
Results. On the basis of consideration of the conceptual apparatus from the standpoint of philosophy, Economics and pedagogy are determined the essential and specific characteristics of innovation. Characterized by signs of systemic innovation. The study of the evolution of innovation and the diversity of their types and types make it possible to present the classification system of innovation influence the strength and scale of impact on the entire education system. On the basis of the allocated spot (local), linear (horizontal plane); structure (spherical, spatial, architectural); the fundamental (base); radical (actually the system); multidimensional (versatile, global) and nadcisnienie innovation. The deduction is substantiated the thesis that the introduction of inclusive education in mainstream educational space requires a system of development tailored to the specific socio-cultural conditions and educational policy. In the text highlights the most important directions of innovative activity of educational institutions – the creation of an inclusive culture, develop inclusive policies and the implementation of inclusive practices.
Conclusions. In conclusion it is emphasized that solving problems in the field of inclusion make a significant transformation in all elements of the education system and the determined image optimize, improve and stimulate the educational environment at the regional and sectoral level, as befits a true system innovation. The conclusion is justified that the introduction of inclusive education in mainstream educational practice as a fundamental, structural, radical, multi-dimensional innovation system has sufficient resources to improve the quality and increase the efficiency of education.
Innovation; system innovation; classification of innovations; inclusive education; education system; system approach; concept of development of inclusive education; quality education
https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?src=s&origin=cto&ctoId=CTODS_1...
1. Alekhina S. V. Principles of inclusion in the context of changes in education practice. Psychological science and education. 2014, no. 1, pp. 5–16. (In Russian)
2. Bogdanova E. V. The Ethics of communication with people with disabilities as part of inclusive culture. Vestnik of N. A. Nekrasov Kostroma state University. 2015, no. 3, vol. 21, pp. 158–160 (In Russian)
3. Gladkaja V. V. Model of psychological and pedagogical support of pupils with special needs in the institution of secondary education. Education and training. 2016, no. 10, pp. 71–78. (In Russian)
4. Kalinina A. A. The Problem of formation of readiness of students to inclusive education at school. Education and society. 2016, no. 3, pp. 57–59. (In Russian)
5. Kozyreva O. A. Theoretical and methodological approaches to the development of the concept of inclusive education. Alma mater. 2015, no. 8, pp. 2–15. (In Russian)
6. Lapin N. I. Theory and practice of innovation. Moscow, Universitetskaya kniga Publ., Logos Publ., 2012, 328 p. (In Russian)
7. The principles of inclusive culture in work with young people: a comparative analysis of youth policy of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus. Eds. V. N. Yarskaya, A. B. Ruchin. Saratov, Yuri Gagarin State Technical University of Saratov Publ., 2016, 132 p. (In Russian)
8. Ryabova N. V., Karpunina O. I. Training of teachers for inclusive education. Higher education in Russia. 2016, no. 10, pp. 119–123. (In Russian)
9. Ryapisov N. A., Ryapisova A. G., Chepel T. L. Health, the different, law – Rav-ing: the development of an inclusive education system at the regional level. Accreditation in education. 2012, no. 55, pp. 28–30. (In Russian)
10. Ryapisova A. G., Chepel T. L. A study of the effectiveness of the educational process in the conditions of inclusive practice. Siberian pedagogical journal. 2013, no. 2, pp. 226–232. (In Russian)
11. Ryapisova A. G. Scientific school as an effective form of training in the field of inclusive education. Journal of pedagogical innovations. 2013, no. 1, pp. 47–57. (In Russian)
12. Ryapisova A. G., Samsonova E., Yakovleva G. Training for inclusive education: the experience of Moscow, Novosibirsk and Chelyabinsk regions. Reference of the head of the preschool. 2013, no. 10, pp. 42–48. (In Russian)
13. Samartseva E. G. Problem of professional readiness of future teachers for inclusive education of children. Education and society. 2016, no. 2, pp. 57–59. (In Russian)
14. Semina L. A. Conceptual approaches to treating the category of "Innovation". Bulletin of Altai state agrarian University. 2012, no. 2, pp. 131–133 (In Russian)
15. Starovoit N. V. The Inclusive culture of the educational organization: approaches to the understanding and formation. Scientific-methodical electronic journal "Concept". 2016, vol. 8, pp. 31–35. (In Russian)
16. Khutorskoy A. V. Pedagogical innovations: methodology, theory, practice Scientific publication. Moscow, UNC DO Publ., 2005, 222 p. (In Russian)
17. Chepel T. L., Abakirova T. P., Samuylenko S. V. the efficiency of the educational process in the conditions of inclusive practice: results of monitoring studies. Psychological science and education. 2014, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 33–41. (In Russian)
18. Aubakirova S., Chepel T., Kulevtsova T. The Study of Teachers’ Attitudes towards Inclusive Education Practice : The Case of Russia. New Educational Review. 2016, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 235–249. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/tner.2016.45.3.19
19. Barres D. G., Carrión Z. C., Delgado R. L.-C. Technologies for Inclusive Ed-ucation: Beyond Traditional Integration Approaches. USA, Information Sciences Reference Publ., 2012, p. 393. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2530-3
20. Bunch G. Emerging research: students with disabilities, families, teachers. Includes bibliographical references. Toronto, Couto Printing & Publishing, Inclusion Press, 2015.
21. Escobedo P., Sales M., Traver J. From Traditional Practices to Inclusive Teaching Practices. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014, vol. 116, pp. 3327–3331. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.757.
22. Herrera M. E. Social innovation for bridging societal divides: Process or leader? A qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of Business Research. 2016, vol. 69, issue 11, pp. 5241–5247. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.119
23. Marimuthu S., Cheong L. S. Inclusive Education for Social Transformation. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015, vol. 172, pp. 317–322. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.sbspro.2015.01.370
24. Poon-McBrayera K. F., Wong P. Inclusive education services for children and youth with disabilities: Values, roles and challenges of school leaders. Children and Youth Services Review. 2013, vol. 35, issue 9, pp. 1520–1525. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.06.009
25. Spratt J., Florian L. Inclusive pedagogy: From learning to action. Supporting each individual in the context of ‘everybody’. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2015, vol. 49, pp. 89–96. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.03.006
26. Tiwari A., Das A., Sharma M. Inclusive education a «rhetoric» or «reality»? Teachers' perspectives and beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2015, vol. 52, pp. 128–136. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.09.002
