Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 111–128
© Zherebilo T. V., 2017
UDC: 
881.373

Integrative onomastic space of a regional variant of the Russian language under conditions of bilingualism

Zherebilo T. V. 1 (Grozny, Russian Federation)
1 Chechen State Pedagogical University, Grozny, Russian Federation
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 8080
Abstract: 

Introduction. The purpose of the article is a comprehensive study of the onomastic space of integrative functioning in the regional version of the Russian language under conditions of the Chechen-Russian bilingualism. The diversity of objectives of the study is determined by the relevance of theoretical and applied research in the field of regional onomastics. The Objectives of the study were formulated as follows: 1) to compile a card index of names used in the Russian speech of bilinguals; 2) to conduct a sociolinguistic experiment in order to identify the problems in the design of names in various genres of official-business style; 3) to identify the most significant linguistic and cultural formation of the onomastic vocabulary, allowing the use of research results in both scientific and educational space of the Republic.
The objectives of the study were refined, differentiated, and it provided an opportunity to consider both theoretical and applied problems. Special attention was paid to the zone of maximum interaction of the Russian and the Chechen languages in the aspect of integrative onomastic space. Therefore, the author studied the main groups of proper names: native, borrowed from the Chechen and other idioms, interacting in the language space of the Republic. The author reviewed the use of anthroponyms, hydronyms, drymonema, zoonyms, idiosomal, microtoponyms, place names, urbanity, etc., imported in the regional version of the Russian language from the linguistic culture of native bilingualism and embodied in various documents.
Materials and Methods. In the research process-invariant variation used methodology, through which linguistic research materials were processed (2015-2016).
Results. The most significant results of the study include: 1) development of a theory based on the integrative description of the onomastic space as a layered, multidimensional dynamic structure characterized by the presence of a large body of loanwords in the Russian language from the Chechen language, representing a native language of the given language, and more than early loans from Arabic, the languages of the peoples of the North Caucasus, the Caucasus, the Turkish languages; 2) prepared the "Dictionary of onomastic terms", the publication of which will create the theoretical and practical basis for a deeper integrative study of the onomastic space; 3) mapped the linguistic material, which can be used in scientific, educational, cultural purposes.
Conclusions. The problem is identified as one of the significant interdisciplinary issues which requires further investigation.

Keywords: 

Proper people's names; bilingualism; integrative onomastic space; onomastics; regional Russian language; linguistic interaction; toponymy

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?src=s&origin=cto&ctoId=CTODS_1...

Integrative onomastic space of a regional variant of the Russian language under conditions of bilingualism

For citation:
Zherebilo T. V. Integrative onomastic space of a regional variant of the Russian language under conditions of bilingualism. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 111–128. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1702.08
References: 
  1. Ageeva R. A. Hydronymy of the Russian Northwest as a source of cultural and historical information. Ed. akad. N. Tolstoy.  2nd edition, corrected.  Moscow, Editorial URSS Publ., 2004, 256 p. (In Russian)
  2. Batkhiev А.М. composition, distribution and zoogeographical analisis of the Chechen Republic theriofauna. SouthofRussia: ecology, development. 2015. no. 2. pp. 62-79. (In Russian)
  3. Batkhiev А.М. Composition, structure, indicators of biodiversity and zoogeographical peculiarities of mammals within the Caucasus, Tersk and Ingushetia and Chechnya. Reflection. 2015, no. 3, pp. 3-18. (In Russian)
  4. Batkhiev А.М. Composition and zoogeographical distribution of mammals of the Caucasus. South of Russia: ecology, development. 2014, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 61-75. (In Russian)
  5. Batkhiev А.М. Zoogeographical peculiarities of the fauna of mammals of the Chechen Republic. Bulletin of the Academy of Sciences of the Chechen Republic. 2014, no. 4, pp. 20-26. (In Russian)
  6. Vasilyev V. L., Vihrova N. On principles can happen that directories (from experience cataloging hydronyms basin Msty). Problems of Onomastic. 2015, no. 1, pp. 84–107. (In Russian)
  7. Vasilieva N. V. Own the name text in the world. Moscow, Academy of Humanities Research Publ., 2005, 224 p. (In Russian)
  8. Galliulina G. R. Dialogue of cultures in onomasticheskom space of a modern multi-ethnic city. Philology and culture.  2012, no. 2, pp. 32–34. (In Russian)
  9. Golovlyov A. A. Some biological and geographical terms and toponyms in the Chechen language. Samarskaya Luka: problems of regional and global ecology. 2007, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 775-783. (In Russian)
  10. Zherebilo T. V. Linguistic State in conditions of bilingualism (on the example of the Chechen Republic). 2-nd edition, corrected and extras.  Nazran, KEP Publ., 2016, 198 p. (In Russian)
  11. Zherebilo T. V. The functioning of the regional version of the Russian language in the Chechen Republic. Nazran: Kep, 2016. 279 p. (In Russian)
  12. Namitokova R. Yu., Sapieva S. K. Caucasian vocabulary as a broadcaster of cultural meanings in the Russian language and speech. Herald of the ASU. Philology and art history. 2010, no. 3, pp. 168–172. (In Russian)
  13. Revzina O. G. Proper names in the poetic idiolekte M. Tsvetaeva. Poetics and stylistics of 1983–1990. Moscow, Science Publ., 1991, pp. 172–193. (In Russian)
  14. Suleymanova L. R., Suleymanov F. M., Lasynova N. A. Proper people's names of Arabic origin with religious semantics in Bashkir shezhire. Questions of onomastics. 2016, no. 1, vol. 13, pp. 117–128. (In Russian)
  15. Superanskaja A. V. General theory of proper name. Moscow, Publ. LKI, 2007, 192 p. (In Russian)
  16. Feoktistova L. A.  Methodology analysis of associative-derivative semantics of personal name. Problems of Onomastic. 2016, no. 1, vol. 13, pp. 85–116. (In Russian)
  17. Hudajberdina M. U. To the problem of structuring the material space of the literary text (on the material of the poetic compendium I. Brodsky "Urania"). PSTU bulletin. Problems of Linguistics and pedagogy. 2010, no. 4, pp. 134–146. (In Russian)
  18. Shcherbak A. S. Dialect onomastics in traditional and cognitive aspects. Questions of cognitive linguistics. 2014, no. 4 (41), pp. 18–22. (In Russian)
  19. Akhmerova L. R., Gilazetdinova G. K. The specific features of psychological condition nomination as the discourse index in the contemporary Russian language. XLinguae. 2015, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 15–23.
  20. Aksholakova A. Students Speech Culture Development in the Sphere of Onomastics. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013, vol. 105, pp. 391–397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.041
  21. BÍrová J., Barancová M., Šimková Z. A note on terminology: bilingualism, plurilingualism and plurilingual intercultural competence or are we all plurilingual? XLinguae. 2016, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 114–127.
  22. Burenhult N., Levinson S. C. Language and landscape: a cross-linguistic perspective. Language Sciences. 2008, vol. 30, issues 2–3, pp. 135–150. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2006.12.028
  23. Cukan J., Lenovsky L., Korina N. B. Culture – language – identity (problem of relations). XLinguae. 2014, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 21–32.
  24. Hertzog W., Ross N. Language ideology, space, and place-based identity formation among the Tzotzil Maya of Chiapas, Mexico. Language Sciences. 2017, vol. 59, pp. 1–15. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2016.06.001
  25. Hramova T. Poetry in the Raw’: Defining and Translating Proper Names in Literature. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2016, vol. 231, pp. 159–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.09.086
  26. Ivanishcheva O. Culture phenomena: lexicographical description issues. XLinguae. 2016, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 73–89.
  27. Karlander D. Roads to regimentation: Place, authenticity and the metapragmatics of naming. Language & Communication. 2017, vol. 53, pp. 11–24. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2016.11.002
  28. Kuprina T. V., Minasyan S. M. Georusistics as new branch of geocultural space. XLinguae. 2014, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 2–20.
  29. Mcmurray B. Language at three timescales: the role of real-time processes in language development and  evolution. Topics in cognitive science. 2016, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 393–407. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tops.12201
  30. Nakhanova L. A. The role of Old Turkic place names in teaching history. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014, vol. 141, pp. 1054–1061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.177
  31. Nuessel F. Language: Semiotics. Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (Second Edition). Elsevier Ltd, 2006, pp. 665–679. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01422-X
  32. Pablé A.  The ‘dialect myth’ and socio-onomastics. The names of the castles of Bellinzona in an integrational perspective. Language & Communication. 2009, vol. 29, issue 2, pp. 152–165. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2008.12.004
  33. Pablé A. Language, knowledge and reality: The integrationist on name variation. Language & Communication. 2010, vol. 30, issue 2, pp. 109–122. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2010.01.001
  34. Savage V. R. Place Names. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Elsevier Ltd, 2009, pp. 178–184. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00984-6
  35. Shamne N. N., Petrova A. A., Rebrina L. N., Milovanova M. V. Phenomenon of memory and category of space: gnoseological and communicative status. XLinguae. 2014, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 32–49.
  36. Sirotkina T. A., Gillespie D. An onomastic approach to the works of A. Ivanov as a reflection of the artistic picture of the world. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014, vol. 154, pp. 272–275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.150
  37. Treimer K. Stand genetischer problem. Lingua. 1957–1958, vol. 7, pp. 274–297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(57)90100-6
  38. Vincent-Lamarre P., Harnad S., Massé A. B., Lord M., Marcotte O., Lopes M. The latent structure of dictionaries. Topics in cognitive science. 2016, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 625–659. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tops.12211
Date of the publication 30.04.2017