Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2015, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 101–110

Modeling and uncertainty of the pedagogical results

Kholina L. I. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation), Abaskalova N. P. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation), Dakhin A. N. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
1 Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

The article describes modeling the content of school education as an open system, discusses the issues of modeling educational processes according to competence-based approach. Different types of educational modeling are described as well as the procedure of modeling the integral competence of a teacher. Some results of open education have had an international impact due to the implementation of macro-educational competence model for pupils and students from various countries, who participated in cultural exchange programmes. The authors propose the technology for the implementation of macro-competence model of participants of the open education. The student competence contains the ability to develop personal attitude to education . The teacher competence includes a willingness to create terms and favorable conditions for students to get acquainted with different cultural contexts, values and ideals of education. The dialogue of participants of education ensures that competence is the result of self- discipline and self-organisation.


teacher modeling, competence-based approach, educational project, the validity of teaching, modeling teaching effects, the model of project

For citation:
Kholina L. I., Abaskalova N. P., Dakhin A. N. Modeling and uncertainty of the pedagogical results. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2015, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 101–110. DOI:
  1. Gusinsky E. N. Theory of systems. Moscow, School Publ., 1994, 184 p. (In Russian)
  2. Shamova T. I. Educational proses in adaptation school. Moscow, Center “Teaching Search” Publ., 2001, 384 p. (In Russian)
  3. Guzeev V. V. Cogitations and education technologies. Moscow, Research Institute of Technology school Publ., 2004, 128 p. (In Russian)
  4. Testov V. A. «Strong» и «plastic» educational models. Pedagogica. 2004, no. 8, pp. 35–39. (In Russian)
  5. Adler M. The paddies proposal. N.Y., 1982, 190 р.
  6. Ashby W. R. Design for a brain. The origin of adaptive behavior. London, 1960, 389 p.
  7. Bloom B. S. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives The Classification Goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive Domian. New York, David McKey Co Publ., 1956, 149 p.
  8. Bruner J. S. Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge, The Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press Publ., 1967, 176 p.
  9. Bruner J. S. The process of education. N.Y., 1960, 229 р.
  10. Dewey J. Experience and education. N.Y., 1948, 256 р.
  11. Hirsch E. D. Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. Boston, 1987, 189 р.
  12. Kolb D., Fry R. Towards an applied theory of experimental leaning. Theories of group processes. Wiley, 1975, pp. 33–57.
  13. Markham T. Lenz B. Ready for the world. Educational leadership. 2012, Vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 47–52.
  14. Pinar W., Reynolds W., Slatter P., Taubman P. An Understanding Curriculum: An Introduction. N.Y., 2012, 177 р.
  15. Shale D. G. Toward a reconceptualization of distance education. Amer. J. Distance Education. 1988, Vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 25–35.
Date of the publication 20.12.2015