Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2015, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 122–133
UDC: 
81.367

Pragmatic factors in reduced constructions: free relatives of the hochesh series

Kustova G. I. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation)
1 Vinogradov Russian Language Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
Abstract: 

The article deals with pronominal constructions – free relatives like [Beri] chto hochesh (‘Take what you like’). They are the result of pronoun clauses reduction (Beri vsio, chto hochesh ‘Take whatever you like’).
Russian free relatives (free-choice pronouns) of the hochesh series (chto hochesh ‘what(ever) you like’; kogda hochesh ‘when(ever) you like’, kto hochesh ‘who(ever) you like’…) have two types of uses. The first type (Ty mozhesh vziat’ chto hochesh ‘You may take what you want’) is characterized by denotative controller of hochesh (‘want’, ‘like’) and by deontic modality of context (‘X was allowed to do P’ – deontic possibility). The second type (On mozhet obmanut’ kogo hochesh ‘He can deceive anyone’) is characterized by communicative controller of hochesh (i.e. addressee). The context expresses alethic possibility (potentiality). Free relative chto hochesh (‘what(ever) you like’) has a paradigm of the person and number.
The main hypothesis: incomplete morphologization of free relatives of the hochesh series can be explained by the fact that hochesh has a subject in contrast to ugodno

Keywords: 

Indefinite pronouns, free relative, free-choice pronouns, reduction, morphologization, modality

https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24284521

For citation:
Kustova G. I. Pragmatic factors in reduced constructions: free relatives of the hochesh series. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2015, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 122–133. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1505.11
References: 
  1. Kryuchkov S. E., Maksimov L. Yu. The Modern Russian. The syntax of complex sentence. Moscow, Prosveshchenie Publ., 1977, 191 p. (In Russian)
  2. Maksimov L. Yu. Multivariate classification of complex sentence. Stavropol, Pyatigorsk, 2011,
    675 p. (In Russian)
  3. Russian Grammar, Vol. II. Syntax. (ed.) N. Yu. Shvedova. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1980, 709 p. (In Russian)
  4. Egorova I. N. Positional equivalents of words in sentence (to analysis of syntactic variable series). The Russian. Grammatical studies. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1967, pp. 78–95. (In Russian)
  5. Vernitskaia S. G. Sentences with a predicative units as sentence part. Moscow, 1969, 18 p. (In Russian)
  6. Ukhanov G. P. Two-member constructions with a subordinate clause in the second part. Essays on the Modern Russian. Moscow, Prosveshchenie Publ., 1969, pp. 105–117. (In Russian)
  7. Shvedova N. Yu. About regular alternant of formal model of simple sentence. Essays on the Modern Russian. Moscow, Prosveshchenie Publ., 1969, pp. 67–80. (In Russian)
  8. Bylinina E. G., Testelets Ya. On some indefinite pronouns constructions: amalgams and free relatives. Report of the workshop «Theoretical semantics» under the direction of Ju. D. Apresjan. Moscow, 2005. (In Russian)
  9. Bylinina E. G., Testelets Ya. G. Sluicing-Based Indefinites in Russian. Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 13: The South Carolina Meeting. 2004, pp. 355–365, ed. Steven Franks, Frank Y. Gladney and Mila Tasseva-Kurktchieva. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.
  10. Haspelmath M. Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford, Oxford University Press Publ., 1997, 364 p.
  11. Tatevosov S. G. Semantics of constituents of noun phrase: quantifier words. Moscow, IMLI RAS Publ., 2002, 239 p. (In Russian)
  12. Assmann A. Three Stages in the Derivation of Free Relatives. F. Heck & A. Assmann. Ed. Rule Interaction in Grammar (Linguistische Arbeitsberichte 90). Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, 2013,
    pp. 203–245.
  13. Apresjan Ju. D. The grounds of systematic lexicography. Ju. D. Apresjan (ed.). A Linguistic Picture of the World and Systematic Lexicography. Moscow, Languages of Slavic Culture Publ., pp. 33–160. (In Russian)
  14. Paducheva E. V. Utterance and its relation to reality: Referential aspects of semantics of pronouns. Moscow, Science Publ., 1985, 271 р. (In Russian)
  15. Paducheva E. V. The Scope of the Negation. Presumption. Suspension of Assertion.
    E. V. Paducheva. Russian negative sentence. Moscow, Languages of Slavic Culture Publ., 2013, pp. 21–40. (In Russian)
  16. Bulygina T. V., Shmelev A. D. Possibilities of natural language and modal logic. T. V. Bulygina, A. D. Shmelev. Linguistic conceptualization of the world (on a material of Russian grammar). Moscow, Languages of Russian Culture Publ., 1997, pp. 209–160. (In Russian)
  17. Kobozeva I. M., Laufer N. I. Meaning of modal predicates of obligation in Russian. Russistik. 1991, no. 1, pp. 68–76. (In Russian)
  18. Russian Grammar, Vol. I. (ed.) N. Yu. Shvedova. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1980, 783 p. (In Russian)
Date of the publication 09.10.2015