Knowledge paradigm in social development: basic concepts
The article reveals the basic concepts of knowledge in understanding the history and contemporary form, the ratio of the values of knowledge and information. It is noted that the knowledge of today is understood by scientists more widely: not only in the historical, cultural, and scientific aspects, but also as the intellectual basis of new, innovative technologies. Today it is around knowledge as an object of knowledge, the formation of new scientific disciplines, research areas, research areas and complex conglomerates for the study of systems, forms of knowledge, hybrid entities in the field of knowledge developed in both theoretical and applied forms. Questions about what is knowledge, what is its meaning, what should I know why (why) know, was already troubled mankind since as soon as it was able to philosophize. The article analyzes approaches to the understanding of knowledge and information in the history of philosophy and science. Scientific knowledge in contemporary social development becomes the basis of people's organization, a necessary condition of their joint activities. It is increasingly becoming a value integrator start in public life, coming to replace the traditional forms of bringing people together.
knowledge, information, knowledge paradigm, knowledge society, information society, cognitive philosophy, study of knowledge, history of philosophy and science
1. Bulkin A. P. Cognition – affect higher: once again about cognitive competence. Problems of modern education. 2013, no. 4, pp. 51–64.
2. Gryaznov B. S. Logic, rationality, creativity. Moscow, 1982.
3. Zamyshlyaev V. I. Humanities meanings of the information society. Philosophy of education. 2005, no. 1, pp. 85–92
4. Ivin A. A., Nikiforov A. L. Dictionary of logic. Moscow, Vlados Publ., 1997, 250 p.
5. Ilinskiy I. M. Educational revolution. Moscow, Moscow humanitarian-social Academy Publ., 2002, 592 p.
6. Kalyanov А. V. The theory of "space-time continuum" from the standpoint of scientific knowledge paradigm. Bulletin of Moscow state University of culture and arts. 2012, no. 2, pp. 17–22.
7. Kolomeitsev I. A. Public consciousness in the flow of information. Science, technology and education. 2014, № 2 (2), pp. 68–73.
8. Kolosov Y. I., Ushakov E. V. Meaningful learning strategy: Danielewski aspect. Bulletin of the Tomsk state university. 2005, no. 45, pp. 77–82.
9. Kostyuk V. N. Information as a social and economic resource. Moscow, Master Publ., 1997, 48 p.
10. Mayer B. O. Cognitive aspects of the modern philosophy of national education. Monograph. Novosibirsk, SB RAS Publ., 2006, 276 p.
11. Mayer B. O. Epistemological aspects of philosophy of education. Monograph. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk state pedagogical University Publ., 2005, 213 p.
12. Moskalenko A. T. Dynamics of knowledge and education in the scientific and technological revolution. Philosophy of education. 2002, no. 5, pp. 75–79.
13. The newest philosophical dictionary. Ed. A. A. Grichanov. Minsk, V. M. Skakun Publ., 1998, 896 p.
14. Stepin V. S. Philosophical anthropology and philosophy of science. Moscow, 1997.
15. Ursul A. D. The problem of information in modern science. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1975, 386 p.
16. Ushakov E. V. System-philosophical content of the modern scientific picture of the world (world Outlook and methodological aspect). Irkutsk, 1999.
17. Ushakova E. V. Systematic philosophy and systematic-philosophical scientific picture of the world at the turn of the third Millennium. In 2 parts. Barnaul, 1998.
18. Ushakov E. V. Study of Knowledge and management. Monograph. Barnaul, Publishing house of the University, 2006.
19. Encyclopedic dictionary of philosophy. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2000.
20. Curenow N. M. Perfection and freedom: Philosophical essays. Krasnoyarsk, 2001, 432 p.
21. Jaspers K. The Meaning and purpose of history. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1991, 527 p.