Violation of the rules of language in advertising discourse (reception and antiproton)
This article presents an analysis of violations of various norms of language on the material of advertising messages. It gives an idea of understanding the effectiveness of the advertising message. Its impact is determined by the difference between the language, speech and ethical standards of communication. the key aspect of the work is the distinction between unintentional violations of norms (in spelling, punctuation) and intentional violations of norms as a stylistic device. The emphasis is not on the violation of spelling rules. The author’s attention is focused on violations of certain grammar, graphic, word formation and syntagmatic norms. He examines such irregularities and questions the effectiveness of this language device. The analysis is based on the theory of linguistic communication. The material under analysis is modern advertising that gives enough opportunity to come to valid conclusions. All types of violations are described in terms of efficiency depending on the addressee factor (youth or adult audience). The ease of reading and understanding the stylistic device by the audience is also taken into account.
advertising discourse, communication, norms of the language, communicative reception
1. Amiri L. P. Word-formation game: the issue of a proportion of occasional nouns, adjectives and verbs in the text of the advertising discourse. M. A. Sholokhov Moscow State Humanitarian University Bulletin. Philology. 2011, no. 3, pp. 44–54. (In Russian)
2. Bolotov V. I. Problems of the theory of the emotional impact of the text. Tashkent, 1985, 402 р. (In Russian)
3. Vinokur T. G. Principles of the stylistic use of language units. Moscow, Science Publ., 1980, 240 р. (In Russian)
4. Golovin B. N. Principles of speech culture. Moscow, Higher School Publ., 1980, 336 р. (In Russian)
5. Gorbachevich K. S. Norms of modern Russian literary language. Moscow, Science Publ., 1978, 208 р. (In Russian)
6. Gorbachevich K. S. Variability of speech and the language norm. Liningrad, Science Publ., 1978, 238 р. (In Russian)
7. Kemerov V. E. Norma. Modern Philosophical Dictionary. (Ed.) V. E. Kemerov. London, Frankfurt, Paris, Luxembourg, Moscow, Minsk, Panprint Publ., 1998, 579 р. (In Russian)
8. Mikhailova U. N. Some syntactic features of the advertising text. Personality. Culture. Society. 2011, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 212–216. (In Russian)
9. Perfilieva N. V. “Sweet Mama”, or how does it sound in Russian? The new methods of language game in the texts of media and advertising. Bulletin of the Russian People's Friendship University. Ser.: Language Theory. Semiotics. Semantics. 2010, no. 1, pp. 28– 31. (In Russian)
10. Peshkovskiy A. M. Objective and normative viewpoints of view on language. A. M.Peshkovskiy. Selected Works. Mоscow, Uchpedgiz Publ., 1959, pp. 50–62. (In Russian)
11. Russian grammar. Ed. N. Y. Shvedova. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1980, vol. 1, 783 р. (In Russian)
12. Rudnev A. V. Russian language. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2013, 224 p. (In Russian)
13. Semeniuk N. N. Norma language. Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1990, pp. 337–338. (In Russian)
14. Skvortsov L. I. Theoretical Foundations of speech culture. Moscow, Science Publ., 1980, 351 р. (In Russian)
15. Skovorodnikov A. P., Kopnina G. A. On the definition of “rhetorical device”. Philology. 2002, no. 2, pp. 75–80. (In Russian)
16. Sokolova V. V. Culture of speech and communication culture. Moscow, Education Publ., 1995, 192 р. (In Russian)
17. Formanovskaya N. I. Communicative and pragmatic aspects ofinteraction units. Moscow, Russian Language Institute A. S. Pushkin Publ., 1998, 328 р. (In Russian)
18. Grice H. P. Logic and conversation. Syntax and semantics. (Ed.) P. Cole, J. L. Morgan. N. Y., Academic Press Publ., 1975, vol. 3, pp. 41–58.