Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2014, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 102–118
UDC: 
94

International relations in the Napoleonic era: the long view [In English]

Lieven D. 1 (Cambridge, UK, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland)
1 Faculty of History, University of Cambridge (Senior Research Fellow – Trinity College) and a Fellow of the British Academy, Cambridge, UK.
Abstract: 

This paper will look at international relations in the Napoleonic era from a perspective which is both long in time and global in breadth. It will also interpret the words ‘international relations’ rather freely, investigating not just diplomacy and inter-state relations but also warfare and the sources of power in this era. Such broad perspectives have clear advantages. Comparative approaches can open up new issues and interpretations. They can also challenge the assumptions and enrich the debates among specialists in any historical field. Since most history-writing – and the history of war in particular - is still national and sometimes even nationalist, global perspectives and international comparisons are doubly useful. Attempting to determine what were the key issues and fundamental trends within a mass of detail is essential to the telling and understanding of history. Like all approaches, however, the broad sweep has its problems. Even the best comparisons can never replace detailed local knowledge based on mastery of the sources. Global perspectives can be little more than vapid bows to contemporary fashion. They can also feed into an inevitable danger when writing history in the longue duree, which is to read the present back into the past and to impose master narratives which legitimize contemporary assumptions and ideologies. The great point, in my opinion, is for the historian to be aware and explicit about these dangers.
The Napoleonic wars occurred in the middle of what historians often call the era of revolutions. Though precise boundaries differ, this era is generally taken to include the French and (usually) American revolutions on the one hand, and the ‘First’ Industrial Revolution on the other. Together these revolutions are seen to have created the foundations of modernity: in other words liberal capitalism, liberal-democratic ideology and the literate, urbanized, wealthy mass societies which are taken to be its most favorable setting. To put things crudely, the era of revolutions has generally been seen as the dividing-line between the early modern and modern ages. The question therefore more or less asks itself whether the spectacular turn taken by international relations – and in particular by warfare – in the age of Napoleon represents itself a decisive shift towards modernity and break with the past. A basic argument in this paper is that while major changes did occur in international relations and especially in warfare, on the whole the elements of continuity were greater than those of change. A further conclusion of this chapter is that although in the long term the forces unleashed by the French and Industrial revolutions were of immense power and destroyed Europe’s old regime , one should nevertheless not underestimate either the strength or sometimes the intelligence with which the old regime confronted these forces in the Napoleonic era

Keywords: 

Napoleonic era, French and Industrial revolutions, international relations, modern ages, liberal-democratic ideology

For citation:
Lieven D. International relations in the Napoleonic era: the long view [In English]. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2014, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 102–118. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1406.09
References: 
  1. David Armitage and Sanjay Subrahmanyam (eds), The Age of Revolutions in Global Context, c.1760-1840  (Houndmills, 2010).
  2. Christopher Bayly, The Birth of the Modern World 1780-1914 (Oxford, 2004).
  3. Paul W. Schroeder, The Transformation of European Politics 1763-1848 (Oxford, 1994).
  4. Roger Chickering and Stig Forster, eds., War in an Age of Revolution, 1775-1815 (Cambridge, 2010).
  5. David A. Bell, TheFirstTotalWar. Napoleon’s Europe and the Birth of Modern Warfare (London, 2007).
  6. Robert C. Allen, The British Industrial Revolution in Global Perspective (Cambridge, 2009)
  7. Dominic Lieven, Russia against Napoleon. The Struggle for Europe 1807-1814 (London, 2009), 7-8.
  8. Louis DiMarco, War Horse: A History of the Military Horse and Rider (Yardley, 2008).
  9. Lieven, Russia against Napoleon, 114-7. Mark Urban, Rifles (London, 2003).
  10. Thierry Lentz, Nouvel Histoire du Premier Empire. III. La France et l’Europe de Napoleon 1804-1814  (Paris, 2007) and Thierry Lentz (ed), Napoleon et l’Europe (Paris, 2005).
  11. Ute Planert, ‘Innovation or Evolution? The French wars in Military History’, ch.3, 69-84 in Chickering and Forster, War.
  12. T.C.W. Blanning, The Origins of the French Revolutionary Wars (London, 1986).  
  13. Paddy Griffith, The Art of War of Revolutionary France 1789-1802 (London, 1998)
  14. John A. Lynn, The Bayonets of the Republic (Boulder, 1994).
  15. T.C. W. Blanning, The French Revolutionary Wars 1787-1802 (London, 1996).
  16. Rafe Blaufarb, The French Army 1750-1820  (Manchester, 2002). ch.6
  17. Franz Szabo, The Seven Years War in Europe 1756-1763  (Harlow, 2008)  
  18. Dennis E. Showalter, The Wars of Frederick the Great (Harlow, 1996)  
  19. Christopher Clark, Iron Kingdom. The Rise and Downfall of Prussia, 1600-1947  (London, 2006).
  20. William C. Fuller, Strategy and Power in Russia 1600-1914 (Harvard, 1998) 576 p.
  21. Carl von Clausewitz, On War (Princeton, 1976): edition translated and edited by Michael Howard and Peter Paret.
  22. Baron Antoine de Jomini, The Art of War (London, 1992), a re-print of the 1862 translation with a new introduction by Charles Messenger.  
  23. Antoine Jomini, Precis Politique et Militaire des Campagnes de 1812 a 1814 (Geneve, 1975).
  24. Dennis Showalter, Frederick the Great. AMilitaryHistory(London, 2012).
  25. Christopher Duffy: Russia’s Military Way to the West (London, 1981).
  26. Lee Kennett, The French Armies in the Seven Years War (Durham/NC, 1967).
  27. Hamish Scott, The Emergence of the Eastern Powers, 1756-1775  (Cambridge, 2001).
  28. Economic Systems and State Finance (Oxford, 1995)
  29. The Rise of the Fiscal State in Europe c 1200-1815 (Oxford, 1999).
  30. Downing B.H., The Military Revolution and Political Change. Origins of Autocracy and Democracy in Early Modern Europe (Princetopn, 1992).
  31. Jeremy Black, From Louis XIV to Napoleon. The Fate of a Great Power (London, 1999)
  32. Colin Jones, The Great Nation. France from Louis XV to Napoleon. 1715-1799  (London, 2002).
  33. Richard Harding, Seapower and Naval Warfare 1650-1830 (London, 1999).
  34. Michel Verge-Franceschi, La Marine Francaise au XVIIIe Siecle (Paris, 1996).
  35. William S. Cormack, Revolution and Political Conflict in the French Navy 1789-1794 (Cambridge, 1994).
  36. Geoffrey Ellis, ‘The Nature of Napoleonic Imperialism’, in Philip Dwyer (ed), Napoleon and Europe (Harlow, 2001), 97-135 (NB the comment on page 124).
  37. The Age of Revolution: 1789-1848. London: Peter Smith Pub Inc., 1999. chapters 8 and 9
  38. The chapters by H.V. Bowen and Rajat Kanta Ray in P.J. Marshall (ed), The Oxford History of the British Empire. TheEighteenthCentury(Oxford, 1998).
  39. John Darwin, The Empire Project The Rise and Fall of the British World-System1830-1970  (Cambridge, 2009).
  40. Mark Jarrett, The Congress of Vienna and its Legacy (London, 2013).
  41. Jeremy Adelman, Sovereignty and Revolution in the Iberian Atlantic (Princeton, 2006).
  42. Gabriel Paquette, Imperial Portugal in the Age of Atlantic Revolutions (Cambridge, 2013).
  43. Leslie Bethell (ed), The Independence of Latin America (Cambridge, 1987).
Date of the publication 05.12.2014