| 
User login
Lexicographical portraying functional words (by the example of the particle-conjunction только)
The article analyzes lexicographical interpretation of the conjunction brace только in dictionaries of different types, and describes the rationale to submit such information on this linguistic unit that would reflect modern usage of the particle-conjunction только in oral and written speech.
The purpose of the article is by the example of the particle-conjunction толь-ко to attempt to represent a lexicographical "portrait" of the functional word. It is noted that the information about the functional word, which the reader of lexico-graphic editions has at the disposal, is either distributed among various dictionaries, or do not fully reflect the current state of the language, therefore, it causes some diffi-culties and inconveniences for the reader. The article also raises important questions of the description of the lexical meaning of the particle-conjunction, representation of the semantic structure of the polysemantic functional unit, which is referred to the problem of polysemy and homonymy differentiation. It emphasizes that lexico-graphic description of each functional word should consider several parameters and include a number of areas reflected in the dictionary entry describing the particle-conjunction within the integrative approach. The article describes those areas and pa-rameters of a dictionary entry which determines a functional word in accordance with the integrative approach and the current state of Russian Studies.
lexicography, lexicographical portraying, functional word, particle - conjunction, dictionary entry
1. Apresyan Yu. D. Basic principles and concepts of systematic lexicography. Language picture of the world and system lexicography. Moscow. Language Slavic Cultures Publ., 2006. pp. 33–74. (In Russian)
2. Bulygina E. Yu., Tripolskaya T. A. Reflection of the picture of the world in the dictionary: illustrative material in the structure of the entry. II Int. conf. "Russian language and literature in the international educational space: Current Status and Prospects" to the 55th anniversary of Russian language teaching in Spain. Granada, 2010, Vol. II, pp. 2131–2136. (In Russian)
3. Vinogradov V. V. Russian language (grammatical teaching of the word). (Ed.) G. A. Zolotova. Moscow, Russian language Publ, 2001. pp. 577–592. (In Russian)
4. Ilienko S. G. Russian studies: selected works. St. Petersburg, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia Publ., 2003. 586 p. (In Russian)
5. Kurilovich J. Essays on linguistics: a collection of articles. Moscow, Publishing House of Foreign Lit., 1962. 490 p. (In Russian)
6. Ozhegov S. I., Shvedova N. Y. Dictionary of the Russian language. Moscow, 1995. 928 с. (In Russian)
7. Perfilieva N. P. Meta text: textocentric and lexicographical aspects. Abstract. diss. ... Doctor of Philological Sciences. Novosibirsk, 2006. 25 p. (In Russian)
8. Dictionary of function Russian words. A. F. Priyatkina, E. A. Starodumova, G. N. Sergeeva, etc. – Vladivostok, Publishing House of the Far Eastern university Publ., 2001. 363 p. (In Russian)
9. Starodumova E. A. Particles of the Russian language (multiaspect description). Vladivostok, Publishing House of the Far Eastern university Publ., 2002. 292 p. (In Russian)
10. Shchur M. G. Particles in the dictionaries. Glossary category. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1988.
pp. 83–87. (In Russian)
