| 
User login
Analysis of the main communicative models of russian and chinese business discourses
In this article the author does attempt to analyse language and extralinguistic features of business by Chinese and Russian partners. The purpose of article – to allocate and characterize the main communicative models of the Russian and Chinese business discourses. It is said that one of manifestations of the active dynamic processes which have happened in language lately, change of strategy of conducting communication, including business communications is. Relevance of a subject is caused by that economic progress of China became most obvious recently, businessmen of their many countries of the world, including from Russia, seek to improve confidential business relations with Chinese, therefore, the knowledge of semantic features of creation of the Chinese and Russian business communication allows to avoid many mistakes, prevents intensity and misunderstanding in the relations between business partners. Special attention is paid to the comparative analysis of the use of traditional Chinese and Russian communication models. The Chinese and Russian approaches to conducting business negotiations are compared by various criteria, such as: intonation, purpose of communication, communication dominant, main source of information, strategy of business, feature of communication and language means. The fixed language assets of expression of straight lines and indirect speech genres with semantics of refusal are separately allocated.
business negotiations, business culture, communication models, ways of expression of refusal, direct/indirect speech genre, modusny indicators, persuazivnost, active processes in Russian
1. Barancheeva E. I. Verbalization features of memory processes: lexicographical limits and discourse representation. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2014, no. 4, pp. 118–132. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1404.11
2. Basalaeva E. G. On some peculiarities of formation odorativnoy metaphorical microsystems Russian language. Siberian Journal of Philology. 2011, no. 4, pp. 192–199. (In Russian)
3. Basalaeva E. G., Bokareva Y. M. Linguistic manipulation of the discourse of representatives of network marketing. Discourse lies and lies as a discourse: Interuniversity collection of scientific papers. (ed.) T. A. Tripolskaia. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Publ., 2012, pp. 154–164. (In Russian)
4. Bychikhina O. V. Statements with value of refusal: semantiko-pragmatical and cognitive aspects: Abstract cand. philol. sciences. Barnaul, 2004, 22 p. (In Russian)
5. Bychikhina O. V. Modal verbs in statements with semantics of refusal. Problems of interpretative linguistics: author-text-addressee. Interuniversity collection of scientific works. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Publ., 2000, pp. 155–164. (In Russian)
6. Bychikhina O. V. Semantic distinctions and features of functioning of lexemes markers of statements with semantics of refusal. International Higher Education Research. Vol. IX. Ed. by Masanao Takeda. Hokkaido University Sapporo, Japan, September 2008, pp. 137–145. (In Russian)
7. Gruzberg L. Language as a system of complex dynamism. Philologist. No. 14 Available at: http://philolog.pspu.ru/module/magazine/do/mpub_14_277 (accessed: 11.10.2013). (In Russian)
8. Dement'ev V. V. Theory of speech genres. Communicative Strategies of Culture. Moscow, Zodiac Publ., 2010, 600 p. (In Russian)
9. Latfulina Z. R. Modus indicators dialect sayings: authorization and persuasiveness. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. 2014, no. 380, pp. 29–33. (In Russian)
10. Ming-Dzher Cheng. Chinese business from within: practical grant on forming of business relations with the Chinese partners. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2009, 288 p. (In Russian)
11. Modern Russian. Ed. V. A. Beloshapkova. Moscow, The higher school Publ., 1989, 800 p. (In Russian)
12. Novik I. B. Complex dynamic systems. Science and Technology. 2010, July 4. DOI: http://naitex.ru/content/view/110/30/ (In Russian)
13. Rouge O. A. Do house the homeless? (Submission of a homeless in Russian language picture of the world). Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2014, no. 3, pp. 75–83. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1403.08 (In Russian)
14. Tripolskaya T. A., Goncharova E. A. Dynamic processes in the lexicon of a language personality. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2014, no. 3, pp. 57–67. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1403.06 (In Russian)
15. Spielman M. V. The dynamic aspect of the evaluation of interpreting reality language personality (based on the prose of A. and B. Strugatsky). Interpretive problems of linguistics. Interuniversity collection of scientific papers. Novosibirsk, 2004, pp. 62–75. (In Russian)
