Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2014, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 175–182
© Bachurina E. B., 2014
UDC: 
УДК 811.161.1'38 + 821.161.1 (092) + Гумилёв Л.Н.

Stylistic variation of L. N. Gumilyov’s discourse by comparative tropes

Bachurina E. B. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
1 Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 3208
Abstract: 

In article E. B. Bachurina gives the features of the usage of comparative tropes (ascomparative units of Functional Semantic Field)) in the academic and popular scientific works of the famous scientist L. N. Gumilev and determines the individual features of language personality of the author. It is noted that L.N. Gumilev, choosing the unconventional style in later works, consciously chose adopted by the academic Canon living language of the narrative. It is emphasized that in early works prevail syntactic comparative: comparison - comparison, comparative patterns, and later the number of lexical and semantic comparatives , metaphors increased markedly.
To sum up, it is revealed one of the most noticeable features of L. N. Gumilev personality language - aspiration to an expressivization of the academic statement being shown in use of the book and colloquial phraseological units which bases are similes, metaphors, literary allusions.

Keywords: 

comparative tropes (simile, metaphor), academic and educational narrative styles of scientific statements

For citation:
Bachurina E. B. Stylistic variation of L. N. Gumilyov’s discourse by comparative tropes. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2014, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 175–182. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1405.19
References: 

1. Arutyunova N. D. Metaphor and discourse. Theory of metaphor. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1990, 512 p. (In Russian)
2. Gumilev L. N. Great feuds in the first Turkish Kaganate, in the light of the Byzantine sources. Byzantine annals. Moscow, Academy of Sciences of the USSR Publ., 1961. V. XX. pp. 75–89. (In Russian)
3. Gumilev L. N. The ancient Turks. VI-VIII centuries. Author’s abstract, Leningrad: Leningrad State University Publ., 1961. 28 p. (In Russian)
4. Gumilev L. N. Monuments Khazar culture in the Volga Delta. Moscow, the Message of the state Hermitage. V. XXVI. 1965. pp. 49–51. (In Russian)
5. Gumilev L. N. From Rus to Russia. Moscow, 2005. 416 p. (In Russian)
6. Gumilev L. N. Ancient Rus and the Great steppe. Moscow, 2006. 656 p. (In Russian)
7. Gusev S. S Science and metaphor. Leningrad: Leningrad State University Publ., 1984. 192 p. (In Russian)
8. Kozhevnikova N. A. Selected Works on the Language of Fictional Literature. Poetics and Stylistics. Moscow, 1991. pp. 37–63. (In Russian)
9. Kozhina M. P., Duskaeva L. R., Salimovskiy W. A. Stylistics of Russian Language. Moscow, Flint Publ., 2008. 464 p. (In Russian)
10. Mozhayeva G. V., Mishankin N. A. Content Analysis of Historiographic Source (on the interdisciplinarity of linguistic methods). Tomsk State University Review, no. 294, pp. 52–61. (In Russian)
11. Ogoltsev V. M. Sustainable Comparison in the System of Phraseology. Leningrad, Leningrad University Publ., 1987. 192 p. (In Russian)
12. Russian language: encyclopaedia. (Ed.) Y. U. Karaulova. Moscow, Big Russian Encyclopedia Publ.. 1997. 721 p. (In Russian)

Date of the publication 25.10.2014