| 
User login
The specifics of the formation network interaction between teachers and parents on moral child rearing: Dynamics assessment of sustainable communication development
Introduction. The article examines the problem of interaction between teachers and parents in a network community with new little-studied resources for educating parents on parenting issues. The purpose of the study is to identify the specifics of the formation of network interaction between teachers and parents on the issues of child rearing based on an assessment of the dynamics of the development of sustainable communication.
Materials and Methods. The methodological foundations of the research are the main provisions of the theory of educational systems, the concept of educational space, a systematic approach to moral education and socialization of children and youth. The results of an empirical study are presented, and a model of interaction between a network community of teachers and parents has been developed and tested, based on the method of network-based blended learning.
Results. The presented results made it possible to substantiate the effectiveness of the developed model of interaction between the network community of teachers and parents, to show the features of interaction between teachers and parents in a network community: a high degree of integration of the participants in the interaction, their unification on the basis of a single verified moral educational content and holding the competencies of network interaction.
Conclusions. The study concludes that parents with a high level of readiness to integrate into a network community, as well as teachers of this category, are distinguished by awareness of the moral educational potential of the environment and their responsibility in its formation, which is the main criterion for the development of sustainable communication.
Issues of child rearing and moral education; Network community; Educating parents; Formation of network interaction; Development of sustainable communication.
- Kralik R. The influence of family and school in shaping the values of children and young people in the theory of free time and pedagogy. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 2023, vol. 14 (1), pp. 249-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15503/JECS2023.1.249.268
- Buyanov А. А., Metlik I. V., Lobyntseva S. V. Formation of primary schoolchildren’s values: Specifics determined by the targets of moral educational. Science for Education Today, 2026, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 74–96. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2602.04
- Milkevich O. A. Specifics of organizing parent education in the practice of interaction between various education stakeholders and students’ families. Science for Education Today, 2025, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 7–25. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2503.01
- Krasnoshchekova G. A., Lozovoy A. Yu., Trach A. S. Methodological basis for development and implementation of business writing and e-mailing online course in the framework of formation of digital educational environment of university. Language and culture, 2021, no. 55, pp. 250-262. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/zacgun
- van der Spoel I. Teachers’ online teaching expectations and experiences during the Covid-19-pandemic in the Netherlands. European Journal of Teacher Education, 2020, vol. 43 (4), pp. 623-638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1821185
- Lomonosova N. V., Zolkina A. V. Digital learning resources: Enhancing efficiency within blended higher education. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, vol. 8 (6), pp. 121–137. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1806.08
- Anderson V. A. Digital pedagogy pivot: Re-thinking higher education practice from an HRD perspective. Human Resource Development International, 2020. vol. 23 (4), pp. 452-467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2020.1778999
- Bennetts K., Bone J. Adult leadership and the development of children’s spirituality: Exploring Montessori’s concept of the prepared environment. International Journal of Children’s Spirituality, 2019, vol. 24 (4). pp. 356-370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1364436X.2019.1685949
- Romanov E. V. Problems of training specialists in the field of digital transformation: the experience of Russia. Education and Science Journal, 2022, vol. 24 (10), pp. 64-102. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/farlkb DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2022-10-64-102
10.Venn E., Park J., Palle Andersen L., Hejmadi M. How do learning technologies impact on undergraduates’ emotional and cognitive engagement with their learning? Teaching in Higher Education, 2020, vol. 28 (4), pp. 822–839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1863349
11.Kochan N. V., Ten V. H., Pushkareva I. Y. Social engagement of youth as a manifestation of a subjective position: Evaluating the value of involvement in socially significant activities. Science for Education Today, 2026, vol. 16 (2), pp. 97-120. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2602.05
12.Poskakalova T. A. A Digital storytelling as a means of education and formation of spiritual and ethical values in adolescence (on the base of classic literature material). Psychological Science and Education, 2023, vol. 28 (4), pp. 177-189. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/ooindz DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2023280411
13.Blayone T. J. B. Theorizing effective use of digital technology with activity theory. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 2019, vol. 28 (4), pp. 447-462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1645728
14.Kharlanova E. M., Sivrikova N. V., Roslyakova S. V., Chernikova E. G. Educating the digital generation: The role of virtual communities. Education and Science Journal, 2024, vol. 26 (1), pp. 103-132. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/xrqkfg DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2024-1-103-132
15.Panshina S. E., Sungurova N. L., Karabushchenko N. B. Personality characteristics of students in the regulation of network activity. Education and Science Journal, 2021, vol. 23 (3), pp. 101-130. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/rbusno DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2021-3-101-130
16.Vial G. Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2019, vol. 28 (2), pp. 118-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
17.Rolland K.-H., Hanseth O. Managing path dependency in digital transformation processes: A longitudinal case study of an enterprise document management platform. Procedia Computer Science, 2021, vol. 181 (1), pp. 765-774. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.229
18.Frolova E. V., Rogach O. V., Kuznetsov Yu. V. Information and educational environment of the university: Priorities and development deficits. Education and Science Journal, 2025, vol. 27 (6), pp. 9-28. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/mopyyx DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2025-6-9-28
19.Koris R., Mato-Díaz F. J., Hernández-Nanclares N. From real to virtual mobility: Erasmus students’ transition to online learning amid the COVID-19 crisis. European Educational Research Journal, 2021, vol. 20 (4), pp. 463-478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041211021247
20.Turnbull D., Chugh R., Luck J. Transitioning to E-Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: How have higher education institutions responded to the challenge? Education and Information Technologies, 2021, vol. 26 (5), pp. 6401-6419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10633-w
21.König J., Jäger-Biela D. J., Glutsch N. Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: Teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 2020, vol. 43 (4), pp. 608-622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650
22.Korotkov A. M., Karpushova O. A., Spiridonova S. B. Method of nerworking blended learning and experience of its implementation in a pedagogical university. Pedagogy, 2024, vol. 87 (9), pp. 17-27. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/pxhcmw
23.Gadušova Z., Hašková A., Szarszoi D. Teachers` competences evaluation: Case study. Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10 (3), pp. 164–177. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2003.09
24.Fischer E., Hänze M. How do university teachers’ values and beliefs affect their teaching? Educational Psychology, 2019, vol. 40 (3), pp. 296-317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1675867
25.Sun L., Ma R., Du C, Zhao J., Yang Yu., Zhang X. A Study on the impact of perceived teacher emotional support on university students' online learning engagement: The mediating role of academic burnout. Frontiers in Psychology, 2025, vol. 16, pp. 1625857. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1625857
26.Zaimoğlu S., Dağtaş A. Enhancing well-being in higher education: The role of job satisfaction and resilience among ELT instructors. Frontiers in Psychology, 2025, vol. 16. P. 1629498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1629498
27.Baginskaya E. S., Karaseva T. V., Tolstova S. Yu. Features of readiness of parents of preschool children to interact with teachers. Scientific Search: Personality, Education, Culture, 2025, no. 3, pp. 43-49. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/mlefgg DOI: https://doi.org/10.54348/SciS.2025.3.8
28.Khatkevich T. S. The main components of the psychological readiness of parents (legal representatives) to interact with teachers of a preschool organization. Amur Science Newsletter, 2024, no. 3, pp. 43-49. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/cskkzg
29.Selivanova N. L., Shakurova M. V. Modern guidelines for the conceptualization of personal development and upbringing in higher education. Izvestiya of Saratov University. New series. Series: Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2024, vol. 13 (2), pp. 169-177. URL: https://elibrary.ru/biuefo DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2024-13-2-169-177
30.Mukhina V. S., Melkov S. V. Personality inner position as the basis for civic identity development. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2022, vol. 18 (1), pp. 105-112. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/auiens DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2022180110
31.Basyuk V. S., Dugarova T. Ts. Phenomenology of personality development and existence: values and meaning. Values and Meanings, 2025, no. 2, pp. 99. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/udcupm
32.Basiuk V. S., Selivanova N. L., Shakurova M. V., Romm T. A. The specifics of modern university practices in introducing students to traditional moral values: A problem-focused expert assessment. Science for Education Today, 2025, vol. 15 (4), pp. 7-33. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/oibsiq DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2504.01
33.Panov V. I. Stages of mastering professional actions: an ecopsychological model of becoming subjectivity. Moscow University Psychology Bulletin, 2016, no. 4, pp. 16-25. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/yqfmsj DOI: https://doi.org/10.11621/vsp.2016.04.16
34.Kaptsov A. V., Kolesnikova E. I. Formation of subjectivity of students of higher education institution in aspect of competence-based approach. Bulletin of Samara Academy for the Humanities. A series of Psychology, 2018, no. 1, pp. 16-33. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/yvaufn
35.Smirnova A. I. Management of event interaction between parents and teachers of a boarding school that implements adapted educational programs. Man and Education, 2021, no. 3, pp. 107-112. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/caughx DOI: https://doi.org/10.54884/s181570410019359-9
36.Petrash E. A., Sidorova T. V. Virtual Interaction between teacher and parents in modern educational institution. Pedagogy. Theory & Practice, 2020, vol. 5 (5), pp. 604-609. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/znroth DOI: https://doi.org/10.30853/ped200144
37.Zeer E. F., Tserkovnikova N. G., Tretyakova V. S. Digital generation in the context of predicting the professional future. Education and Science Journal, 2021, vol. 23 (6), pp. 153-184. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/ndpsat DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2021-6-153-184
38.Sorokova M. G., Odintsova M. A., Radchikova N. P. Evaluation of digital educational technologies by university teachers. Psychological Science and Education, 2023, vol. 28 (1), pp. 25-39. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/cpxucl DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2023280101
39.Margolis A. A. Pedagogical education as the development of initial pedagogical ideas. Psychological Science and Education, 2024, vol. 29 (6), pp. 5-20. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/iwkuev DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2024290601
40.Dudina E. A. Mentoring as an educational activity: Essential characteristics and structure. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, vol. 7 (5), pp. 25–36. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1705.02
41.Hašková A., Lukáčová D., Noga H. Teacher’s self-assessment as a part of quality management Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9 (2), pp. 156–169. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1902.11
42.Spiridonova S. B., Karpushova O. A., Shubina A. S. The models of the networking training of the teachers to the work with the families of the children, who experienced the military actions. Proceedings of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University, 2023, no. 10, pp. 69-75. URL: https://elibrary.ru/foqgqi
