Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 145–171
© Politsinskaya E. V., Trofimov A. V., Lizunkov V. G., 2023
UDC: 
331.1+378.2+001.891.57

Neurodidactic model of an integrated educational and industrial cluster: Evaluating the effectiveness of preparing labor resources

Politsinskaya E. V. 1 (Yurga, Russian Federation), Trofimov A. V. 2 (Tomsk, Russian Federation), Lizunkov V. G. 1 (Yurga, Russian Federation)
1 Tomsk Polytechnic University Yurga Institute of Technology
2 Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education "National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University"
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 285
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article discusses the problem of developing significant competencies for a future engineer. The purpose of the study is to substantiate the effectiveness of the neurodidactic model of an integrated educational and industrial cluster for preparing labor resources proposed by the authors.
Materials and Methods. The research follows the logic of a pedagogical experiment. The development of the neurodidactic model was built on the analysis of pedagogical practices in introducing neuropedagogy into the educational process. As part of the study, the material obtained from the empirical data collection was analyzed and summarized. The sample consisted of 289 students majoring in technical areas of study. V. Smekal and M. Kucher’s “Personality orientation” inventory was chosen to confirm the effectiveness of the proposed neurodidactic model.
Results. Theoretical analysis of scholarly literature made it possible to systematize the existing practices of introducing neuropedagogy into the educational process and reveal the most effective ones, as well as to identify factors determining the effectiveness of applying neurodidactic principles in the educational process. The formative experiment involved a revision of educational content and substantiation of the significance of the neurodidactic model of teaching and learning. As part of the formative experiment, most students developed a professional personality orientation, which plays an important role in the development of significant key competencies for an engineer.
Conclusions. The research findings indicate that the neurodidactic learning model implemented within the educational process of the university ensures the professional orientation of the student’s personality and, as a result, obtaining high learning outcomes.

Keywords: 

Professional orientation of personality; Key professional competencies; Competencies of future engineer; Neuro-didactic model of engineer training; High educational outcomes

For citation:
Politsinskaya E. V., Trofimov A. V., Lizunkov V. G. Neurodidactic model of an integrated educational and industrial cluster: Evaluating the effectiveness of preparing labor resources. Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 145–171. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2306.07
References: 
  1. Bobrovskaya A. S. Use of neurodydactics in teaching humanitarian subjects. Modern Research in the Field of Teaching Foreign Languages at a Non-Linguistic University, 2021, no. 10, pp. 10–17. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47252327  
  2. Dubrovskaya Yu. A., Pikhkonen L. V. Frame-based and practice-oriented learning in training mining engineers. News of the Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University, 2022, no. 205, pp. 102–115. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.33910/1992-6464-2022-205-102-115 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49571713
  3. Zeer E. F., Sychenko E. F., Zhuravleva E. V. Neurotechnologies in professional education: Reflection of their possibilities. Pedagogical Education in Russia, 2021, no. 3, pp. 8–15. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.26170/2079-8717_2021_03_01 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46375049  
  4. Klemantovich I. P., Levanova E. A., Stepanov V. G. Neuropedagogy: A new branch of scientific knowledge. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education, 2016, no. 2, pp. 8–17. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26535219
  5. Kozlova Yu. B. Gamification in the system of modern higher education: Theoretical foundations and practical significance. History and Pedagogy of Natural Science, 2022, no. 1, pp. 19–22. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48437554  
  6. Malsagova M. Kh., Malsagov A. A. Experimental approbation of neuropedagogical technologies. World of Science, Culture, Education, 2022, no. 6, pp. 241–243. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=50068008
  7. Pavelko N. N. Frame technologies and framing in the context of digital pedagogy. Bulletin of IMSIT, 2022, no. 1, pp. 3–10. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48154277
  8. Sorochinsky, M. A., Popov M. V. Neurointerfaces: History, principle of operation, pedagogical potential. Innovations in Education, 2022, no. 10, pp. 96–107. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49558668  
  9. Asikainen H., Gijbels D. Do students develop towards more deep approaches to learning during studies? A systematic review on the development of students’ deep and surface Approaches to Learning in Higher Education. Educational Psychology Review, 2017, vol. 29 (2), pp. 205–234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9406-6

10. Beaulieu A. Voxels in the brain: Neuroscience, informatics and changing notions of objectivity. Social Studies of Science, 2001, vol. 31 (5), pp. 635–680. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030631201031005001   

11. Budhai S. S., Skipwith K. B. Best practices in engaging online learners through active and experiential learning strategies. New York: Routledge, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315617503  

12. Carew T. J., Magsamen S. H. Neuroscience and education: An ideal partnership for producing evidence-based solutions to guide 21st century learning. Neuron, 2010, vol. 67 (5), pp. 685–688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.08.028  

13. Fischer K. W., Daniel D. B., Immordino-Yang M. H., Stern E., Battro A., Koizumi H. Why mind, brain, and education? Why now? Mind, Brain, and Education, 2007, vol. 1 (1), pp. 1–2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228x.2007.00006.x  

14. Gvozdii S., Bakhov I., Pienov V., Palamarchuk S., Dudnyk N., Petrukhan-Shcherbakova L. Neuropedagogy in contemporary formal and non-formal education. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, vol. 13 (4), pp. 264–279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/13.4/387  

15. Howard-Jones P. Neuroscience and education: Myths and messages. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2014, vol. 15 (12), pp. 817–824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3817

16. Kolb A. Y., Kolb D. A. Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2005, vol. 4 (2), pp. 193–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2005.17268566  

17. McEwen B. S. The neurobiology of stress: From serendipity to clinical relevance. Brain Research, vol. 886 (1–2), pp.172–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02950-4

18. Olds J., Disterhoft J. F., Segal M., Kornblith C. L., Hirsh R. Learning centers of rat brain mapped by measuring latencies of conditioned unit responses. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1972, vol. 35 (2), pp. 202–219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1972.35.2.202  

19. Samsonovich A. V. Socially emotional brain-inspired cognitive architecture framework for artificial intelligence. Cognitive Systems Research, 2020, vol. 60, pp. 57–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2019.12.002 

20. Sarancha I., Maksymchuk B., Gordiichuk G., Berbets T., Berbets V., Chepurna L., Golub V., Chernichenko L., Behas L., Roienko S., Bezliudna N., Rassskazova O., Maksymchuk I. Neuroscientific principles in labor adaptation of people with musculoskeletal disorders. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2021, vol. 12 (4), pp. 206–223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/12.4/245

21. Sweetman D. Making virtual learning engaging and interactive. FASEB Bioadvances, 2021, vol. 3 (1), pp. 11–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1096/fba.2020-00084

22. Torres Ríos H., Alvarado Zermeño G., Bernal Trigueros A. Caracterización del neuroaprendizaje en estudiantes de licenciatura. DEBATES en Evaluación y Currículum, 2018, vol. 4. URL: https://postgradoeducacionuatx.org/pdf2018/A231.pdf 

Date of the publication 31.12.2023