Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 83–98
UDC: 
141.201+37.03+004.8+316.77

‘Constants’ and ‘variables’ of digitalized education [in English]

Letyagin L. N. 1 (St. Petersburg, Russian Federation), Ignatev D. Y. 1 (St. Petersburg, Russian Federation)
1 The Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article examines the problem of informatization of a globalized society. The purpose of the study is to summarize the ideas about the ‘constants’ and ‘variables’ of modern university education as a self–organizing system actively involved in the processes of digitalization.
Materials and Methods. In order to achieve the research aim, a thematic review of Russian and international studies on the issues of informatization of a globalized society has been conducted. The study involved a comparison of alternative points of view reflected in the works by B. Readings, P. Cramer, etc. The analysis of existing theories of the information society has been carried out.
Results. Reviewing the results of Russian and international studies has shown that the world picture today is structured predominantly by the modern media, while most globalizing trends are becoming less and less manageable.
The history of philosophy frequently addresses the problem analysis of such paradigmatic shifts which arise implicitly and take shape in emergence. The article discloses the authors’ understanding of ‘constants’ and ‘variables’ in contemporary university education as a self-organizing system that is rapidly undergoing an intensive process of digitalization. A traditional European university typically demonstrates its ‘aura of age’. The questions are: ‘To what extent is the structure of consciousness influenced by the development of digital resources and by outsourcing the functions of academic word and of individual memory to external digital data media?’; ‘To what degree can production of university knowledge act as an intellectual practice and determine the independence of thinking?’ The problem of establishing the topic of academic engagement and interaction in online formats is considered to be debatable.
The authors show that today individuals as subjects of cognitive activities find themselves in a situation where they face value choices, which, in their turn, determine the prospects and the potential of cultural development. Mnemonic operations are to longer perceived as the art of memory.
This problem attains special significance during the process of building humanitarian education within the system of electronic communication.
One cannot claim categorically that individuals cease to think structurally when they relay the function of storing information to digitized sign systems as a universal resource.
Conclusions. The conducted research allowed the authors to conclude that the development of digital technologies as a means of fulfilling social interests means positioning the idea of ‘digital equality’ as the main social asset. This has stimulated establishing cardinally new directions in humanities research.
At the same time, the need in relevant and timely connections between the concepts of infogenesis and semiosis is seen today as one of the most current issues in world paradigm problems.

Keywords: 

The problem of informatization; Globalizing society; Modern university education; Digitalization processes; Theories of information society.

For citation:
Letyagin L. N., Ignatev D. Y. ‘Constants’ and ‘variables’ of digitalized education [in English]. Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 83–98. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2306.04
References: 
  1. Braiki B. Al., Harous S., Zaki N., Alnajjar F. Artificial intelligence in education and assessment methods. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 2020, vol. 9 (5), pp. 1998–2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v9i5.1984  URL: https://www.beei.org/index.php/EEI/article/view/1984/1595
  2. Bender P. K., Gentile D. A. Internet gaming disorder: Relations between needs satisfaction in-game and in life in general. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2020, vol. 9 (2), pp. 266–278. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000227
  3. Cramer P. A. Review of The university in ruins. Workplace: A Journal for Academic Labor, 2000, vol. 6, pp. 107–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14288/workplace.v0i6  URL: https://ices.library.ubc.ca/index.php/workplace/issue/view/182231
  4. Donskikh O. A. The new normal? Higher Education in Russia, 2020, vol. 29 (10), pp. 56–64. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-10-56-64 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44036483
  5. Gómez-Galán J., Martínez-López J. Á., Lázaro-Pérez C., Fernández-Martínez M. del M. Usage of internet by university students of Hispanic countries: Analysis aimed at digital literacy processes in higher education. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 2021, vol. 10 (1), pp. 53–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2021.1.53  URL: https://ejce.cherkasgu.press/journals_n/1618325289.pdf
  6. Huang Y.-C., Backman S. J., Backman K. F., McGuire F. A., Moore DeWayne. An investigation of motivation and experience in virtual learning environments: A self-determination theory. Education and Information Technologies, 2019, vol. 24 (1), pp. 591–611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9784-5
  7. Ignatev D. Yu., Letyagin L. N. Teleology of the university as the ideal of scientific knowledge. Ideas and Ideals, 2017, no. 3, pp. 77–86. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17212/2075-0862-2017-3.1-77-86 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29966189
  8. Koukopoulos Z., Koukopoulos D. Integrating educational theories into a feasible digital environment. Applied Computing and Informatics, 2019, vol. 15 (1), pp. 19–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2017.09.004
  9. Letyagin L. N., Ashikhmin A. V. Institutionalisation of university aesthetics: From formal rhetoric to the structure of philosophical knowledge. Nauchnoe Mnenie, 2022, no. 5, pp. 38–44. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.25807/22224378_2022_5_38 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48591938
  10. Mayer B. O. Education in the conditions of global changes: A methodological function of philosophy of education. Philosophy of Education, 2012, no. 6, pp. 117–124. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18152690
  11. Marzullo R. Education and technology. Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 2022, vol. 20 (1), pp. 163–173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54808/jsci.20.01.163
  12. Mubarak A., Quinn S. General strain theory of Internet addiction and deviant behaviour in social networking sites (SNS). Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 2019, vol. 17 (1), pp. 61–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-08-2016-0024
  13. Piskunova E. V., Akhayan A. A., Zair-Bek E. S., Letyagin L. N., Lugovaya V. F., Proekt Yu. L., Bessonova E. A., Borovik L. K. Methodological grounds for supporting the educational process in the metasubject field of digital content in the context of conceptual ideas of information anthropology. Monograph. St. Petersburg, Herzen University Press, 2020. 255 p. (In Russian) ISBN 978-5-8064-2841-8 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44400609
  14. Pruzhinin B., Bogdanov S., Vasilevich N., Vasineva P., Gryakalov A., Ignatyev D., Isupov K., Kozmin V., Martynova S., Shchedrina T., Korolkov A., Letyagin L., Monakhov V., Liashko A., Nikiforova L., Stepanova A., Tsvetkova L., … Shomolova T. The Anthropology of the museum: The conceptual sphere of ideas, historical dialogue and the preservation of value constants (Materials of the “Round Table”). Russian Studies in Philosophy, 2019, no. 5, pp. 5–23. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S004287440005052-2 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37711037
  15. Pruzhinin B. I., Gryakalov A. A., Ignatev D. Yu., Korolkov A. A., Letyagin L. N., Shchedrina T. G., Sholomova T. V., … Valitskaya A. P. What Kind of Education is Most Worth for Us? Materials of the “Round Table”. Russian Studies in Philosophy, 2018, no. 6, pp. 34–58. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.7868/S0042874418060031 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35095714
  16. Pushkarev Yu. V., Pushkareva E. A. Specifics of information and communication developments in education: Analysis of value changes before and after 2020 (a critical review). Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11 (6), pp. 96–119. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2106.06 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47447640
  17. Pushkareva E. A., Pushkarev Yu. V. Philosophy of continuing education: cognitive foundations of personal development in modern conditions. Monograph. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Publ., 2019, 142 p. (In Russian) ISBN 978-5-00104-518-2 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43300997
  18. Readings B. The university in ruins. Cambridge (Mass.); London: Harvard University Press, 1996. X, 238 p. URL: https://www.ses.unam.mx/docencia/2007I/Lecturas/Mod4_Readings.pdf
  19. Rossmann A. Digital Maturity: Conceptualization and Measurement Model. 39th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS–2018) Bridging the Internet of People, Data, and Things. San Francisco (Calif.), Curran Associates, Inc. Publ., 2019, vol. 2, pp. 1633–1642. ISBN 978-1-5108-8104-4 URL: https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2018/governance/Presentations/8
  20. Salmi H., Thuneberg H., Vainikainen M.-P. Making the invisible observable by augmented reality in informal science education context. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 2016, vol. 7 (3), pp. 253–268. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2016.1254358  URL: https://www.sci-hub.ru/10.1080/21548455.2016.1254358
  21. Senyo P. K., Liu K., Effah J. Digital business ecosystem: Literature review and a framework for future research. International Journal of Information Management, 2019, vol. 47, pp. 52–64. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.002
  22. Sholomova T. V. Bourgeois Aesthetics and Russian Culture. Monograph. St. Petersburg, Asterion Publ., 2017. 287 p. (In Russian) ISBN 978-5-00045-415-2 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28837787
  23. Souto-Otero M. Validation of non-formal and informal learning in formal education: Covert and overt. European Journal of Education, 2021, vol. 56 (3), pp. 365–379. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12464 URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejed.12464
  24. Sureda Garcia I., López Penádes R., Rodríguez Rodríguez R., Sureda Negre J. Cyberbullying and internet addiction in gifted and nongifted teenagers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 2020, vol. 64 (3), pp. 192–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220919338  URL: https://www.sci-hub.ru/10.1177/0016986220919338
  25. Valitskaya A. P., Nikiforova A. A., Preobrazhenskaya K. V. European education: Phenomenon, myth, or project? Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 2022, vol. 22 (15), pp. 12–19. URL: https://www.articlegateway.com/index.php/JHETP/article/view/5556/5277
  26. Zimbuli A. E. The Internet: A resource and a moral test. Humanitarian Vector, 2020, vol. 15 (4), pp. 200–209. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.21209/1996-7853-2020-15-4-200-209 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43930655
Date of the publication 31.12.2023