Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 53–75
© Druzhinina A. A., Garashkina N. V., 2023
UDC: 
378+ 37.025+159.955

Developing system thinking skills in education students by means of cognitive mapping strategy

Druzhinina A. A. 1 (Tambov, Russian Federation), Garashkina N. V. 2 (Moscow region, Mytishchi, Russian Federation)
1 Tambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavin
2 State University of Education
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 478
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article is devoted to the problem of developing Education undergraduates’ system thinking skills through cognitive mapping. The purpose of the article is to identify the specifics of the development of system thinking skills in Education undergraduates by means of cognitive mapping strategy.
Materials and Methods. The study follows competence-based, systemic and activity-based approaches to teaching Education students. The authors used a set of theoretical (analysis, synthesis, reviewing scholarly publications) and empirical methods. The empirical research was conducted as a formative teaching experiment (action research). The empirical data were analyzed and summarized. The sample consisted of 186 Education students (State University of Education, Tambov State University named after G. R. Derzhavin). In order to verify the research findings, the authors developed and used a system thinking skills scale and A. V. Panova and M. A. Fedorova’s system thinking assessment inventory. In order to assess system thinking skills, the authors selected a set of criteria based on the analysis of R. A. Excelsa, G. K. Semiz and G. Teksoz’s studies. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to determine the reliability of the reported statistics and the accuracy of the results.
Results. Based on the analysis of theoretical studies and successful educational practices, the authors clarified the concept of developing the skills of systemic thinking in Education students, identified the specifics of this process on the basis of a formative experiment on the implementation of cognitive mapping strategy (setting the goal; choosing a topic for mapping; collecting information; preparing materials; definition of key terms; creation of the first level of the cognitive map; adding additional levels; analysis and evaluation; preparation for use; editing and updating). Summarizing theoretical and empirical data, the authors developed and justified diagnostic tools for measuring students’ system thinking skills (role levels include pre-aware; developing; developer and master), and identified the level of system thinking skills in future teachers. The study has proved the effectiveness of the purposeful development of system thinking skills in Education students by means of cognitive mapping strategy.
Conclusions. The article concludes about the effectiveness of developing systemic thinking skills in Education students through cognitive mapping strategy. Research findings on the level students’ system thinking skills are summarized.

Keywords: 

Systems thinking; Systems thinking skills; Cognitive mapping; Cognitive maps; Initial teacher education; Didactic strategy

For citation:
Druzhinina A. A., Garashkina N. V. Developing system thinking skills in education students by means of cognitive mapping strategy. Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 53–75. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2304.03
References: 
  1. Assaraf O. B. Z., Orion N. Four case studies, six years later: Developing system thinking skills in junior high school and sustaining them over time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2010, vol. 47 (10), pp. 1253–1280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20383
  2. Bauman A. Concept maps: Active learning assessment tool in a strategic management capstone class. College Teaching, 2018, vol. 66 (4), pp. 213–221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2018.1501656
  3. Ekselsa R. A., Purwianingsih W., Anggraeni S., Wicaksono A. G. C. Developing system thinking skills through project-based learning loaded with education for sustainable development. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 2023, vol. 9 (1), pp. 62–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v9i1.24261 
  4. Fu Q.-K., Lin C.-J., Hwang G.-J., Zhang L. Impacts of a mind mapping-based contextual gaming approach on EFL students’ writing performance, learning perceptions and generative uses in an English course. Computers & Education, 2019, vol. 137, pp. 59–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu. 2019.04.005
  5. Hazaymeh W. A., Alomery M. K. The effectiveness of visual mind mapping strategy for improving English language learners' critical thinking skills and reading ability. European Journal of Educational Research, 2022, vol. 11 (1), pp. 141–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.141
  6. Rachman D., Khatimah K. Mind mapping vs semantic mapping: Which technique gives EFL learners more benefits in reading comprehension? Journal of English Educators Society, 2018, vol. 3 (2), pp. 165–176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v3i2.1498
  7. Ledashcheva T., Pinaev V. Cognitive modeling as a means of assessment and formation of systemic thinking. E3S Web of Conferences, 2021, vol. 265, pp. 07009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126507009
  8. Long D. J., Carlson D. Mind the map: How thinking maps affect student achievement. Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research, 2011, vol. 13 (2), pp. 1083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4148/2470-6353.1083
  9. Mohaidat M. M. T. The impact of electronic mind maps on students' reading comprehension. English Language Teaching, 2018, vol. 11 (4), pp. 32–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n4p32

10. Parikh N. D. Mind map and concept map as complementary tools for teaching. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 2015, vol. 2 (4), pp. 147–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25215/0204.015

11. Polat Ö., Aydn E. The effect of mind mapping on young children’s critical thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2020, vol. 38, p. 100743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100743

12. Rosciano A. The effectiveness of mind mapping as an active learning strategy among associate degree nursing students. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 2015, vol. 10 (2). pp. 93–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2015.01.003

13. Rodriguez Sandoval M. T., Bernal Oviedo G. M., Rodriguez-Torres M. I. From preconceptions to concept: The basis of a didactic model designed to promote the development of critical thinking. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2022, vol. 3, pp. 100207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100207

14. Semiz G. K., Teksoz G. Developing the systems thinking skills of pre-service science teachers through an outdoor ESD course. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 2020, vol. 20 (4), pp. 337–356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2019.1686038 

15. Shaked H., Schechter C. Systems thinking leadership: New explorations for school improvement. Management in Education, 2020, vol. 34 (3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020620907327

16. Shi Y., Yang H., Dou Y., Zeng Y. Effects of mind mapping-based instruction on student cognitive learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review, 2023, vol. 24, pp. 303–317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09746-9

17. Stokhof H., de Vries B., Bastiaens T., Martens R. Using mind maps to make student questioning effective: Learning outcomes of a principle-based scenario for teacher guidance. Research in Science Education, 2020, vol. 50, pp. 203–225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9686-3

18. Terzieva T., Rahneva O., Dilyanov V. Pedagogical strategies for development of cognitive skills in a digital environment. International Journal of Differential Equations and Applications, 2021, vol. 20 (2), pp. 251–261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12732/ijdea.v20i2.11

19. Vasconcelos P. N., Zambroni de Souza A. C. A problem-based introduction to technical, social, and systemic thinking in engineering courses. IEEE Access, 2022, vol. 10, pp. 73521–73532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3189654

20. Wardani H., Mitarlis M. Development of students’ worksheet with mind mapping strategy to improve the students’ creative thinking skills on stoiciometry materials. Journal of Chemistry Education Research, 2019, vol. 3 (2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/jcer.v3n2.p58-64

21. Garashkina N. V., Druzhinina A. A. Cognitive engagement involvement as a basis for designing the educational process in the preparation of students of pedagogical directions. Vy`sshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2023, vol. 32 (1), pp. 93–109. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-1-93-109 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=50215838

22. Lunina I. N., Pokrovskaya M. V., Rezchikova E. V. Integration of pedagogical technologies developed for healthy and auditory impaired students. Vy`sshee Obrazovanie v Rossii, 2013, no. 2, pp. 90–95. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18799064

23. Mashhenko M. V., Volkova E. A. The development of the system style of thinking of high school students in the process of teaching computer science: monograph Krasnoyarsk: Scientific and Innovation Center, 2017. 100 p. ISBN 978-5-906314-70-3 (In Russian)  DOI: https://doi.org/10.12731/MashchenkoVolkova.2017.100   URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30625898

24. Panov A. V., Fedorova M. A. Systems thinking development. Omsk Scientific Bulletin, 2014, no. 4, pp. 162–165. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22566305

25. Shtejnberg V. E., Manko N. N., Vaxidova L. V., Fatxulova D. R. Visual didactic regulators as instruments of learning activity: Development and applied aspects. Obrazovanie i nauka, 2021, vol. 23 (6), pp. 126–152. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2021-6-126-52 URL: https://elibrary.ru/zshygz

Date of the publication 31.08.2023