Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 73–99
UDC: 
101.1+37.01

Educational space as a historical and philosophical phenomenon: Theoretical and methodological foundations

Barkova V. V. 1 (Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation), Uvarina N. V. 2 (Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation), Mamylina N. V. 1 (Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation), Shagina G. V. 1 (Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation), Savchenkov A. V. 1 (Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation)
1 South Ural State Humanitarian Pedagogical University
2 Southern Ural state humanitarian and pedagogical University
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article theoretically examines the genesis of specific features of such key pedagogical concepts and categories as ‘education’ and ‘educational space’ in the historical and philosophical context, adapted to the conditions of multi-vector social challenges of modern reality. Interest in the problem of the studied phenomena is determined by modern discussions around the current educational space, the specifics of its self-development in the historical and philosophical context of research in a rapidly and sometimes unpredictably changing social reality. The purpose of the article is a historical and philosophical analysis of the essence and existence of the educational space in the comparative context of sociocultural and cognitive characteristics of society.
Materials and Methods. The methodological basis of the study was formed by historical-philosophical and systematic approaches. The authors used the principles of flexible rationality in building theoretical constructs of the phenomena ‘education’ and ‘educational space’. The methodological value of the study lies in the historical and philosophical analysis of the problems of the formation of educational space in Antiquity, the Middle Ages, the Enlightenment and the New Age, which makes it possible to navigate the variety of manifestations of the modern educational environment. Methods used by the authors include: comparative-historical, deductive, chronological, generalization and analysis.
Results. The main results lie in the historical and philosophical analysis of the essence and existence of educational space and the disclosure of its specific characteristics in the comparative context of the socio-cultural characteristics of education, which allows to interpret the education itself as a unity of the process and result of the development and appropriation by the individual of general forms of interaction with the objects of reality and themselves that have been developed by the community and anchored in the culture.
The study shows that the educational area of the Middle Ages absorbed a symphony of theological, philosophical and scientific knowledge in the true sense. During that time, scientific knowledge was pushed into the background compared to the knowledge of God and the soul. The authors established the idea that the evolving educational space, responding to the challenges of the time, determines the subject of education, i.e. in the womb of subject-subject and subject-object relationships. The authors highlight the relevant issues of the phenomenon of educational space as a complex, self-evolving system functioning as a significant sphere of social life. The educational space in the Age of Enlightenment begins to actively differentiate itself from layers of social spaces, as everyone realizes that through education, the process of deobjectification and objectification occurs in the human mind. One of the projections of modernity predictions is the transformation of education in postmodern society and the transition from the broadcasting and facilitating function of education to a mediating one.
Conclusions. The authors have identified specific features of the genesis of the concepts of ‘space’, ‘education’, and ‘educational space’ in the comparative context of the historical and philosophical paradigm of the sociocultural characteristics of society and the role of education in it. The main content of the problem of the educational space as a societal phenomenon that is in a development and evolution situation together with society and the epoch is generalized. The position is justified that in the philosophical discourse, which is woven from people's cognitive actions and interpersonal communication, the educational space exhibits a developmental logic not only ontologically but also epistemologically, creating a unique phenomenon - educational environments in which its social criteria and meanings are formed and implemented. It was shown that the educational space reflects the structural coexistence and interaction of all possible educational systems, their components, educational events, for the existence of which the epoch is able to create conditions. It is noted that the educational space is an open system subject to dissipative processes, the emergence of new structures and the destruction of those that are energetically unable to maintain their existence.

Keywords: 

Education; Space; Educational space; Student; Social reality; Sociocultural characteristics.

For citation:
Barkova V. V., Uvarina N. V., Mamylina N. V., Shagina G. V., Savchenkov A. V. Educational space as a historical and philosophical phenomenon: Theoretical and methodological foundations. Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 73–99. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2303.04
References: 
  1. Hughes J. M., Morrison L. J. Innovative learning spaces in the making. Frontiers in Education, 2020, vol. 5, pp. 89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00089
  2. Burke C., Whyte W. The spaces and places of schooling: Historical perspectives. Oxford Review of Education, 2021, vol. 47 (5), pp. 549–555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2021.1973984
  3. Lebedeva Yu. I. Ancient Greeks’ ideas on space and time according to poems “Iliad” and “Odyssey”. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 2016, no. 4, pp. 216–222. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27299058
  4. Mukhin A. S. The categories of "space" and "time" in the philosophy of antiquity, the Middle ages and the Renaissance. Izvestiya RSPU named after A. I. Herzen, 2007, no. 37, pp. 132–142. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=12870483
  5. Inamura K. Aristotle’s political theory as a craft and science in politics 4–6. Polis: The Journal for Ancient Greek and Roman Political Thought, 2022, vol. 39 (3), pp. 553–575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340381
  6. Wendt R. W. House, state, and world fundamental concepts of societal governance in the West and East in comparison. Wendt Asian Journal of German and European Studies, 2018, vol. 3, pp. 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40856-018-0033-x
  7. Chapouthier G. Aristotelian entelechy and modern biology. Biocosmology – neo-Aristotelism, 2018, vol. 8 (3/4), pp. 421–430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/2225-1820-2018-00021
  8. Roumpou S. Aristotle’s entelechy and eudaimonia in sports. Psychological Thought, 2018, vol.  11  (2), pp. 62–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v11i2.252 URL: https://psyct.swu.bg/index.php/psyct/article/view/252/html
  9. Northoff G. Lessons from astronomy and biology for the mind-Copernican revolution in neuroscience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2019, vol. 13, pp. 319. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00319
  10. Chamberlain C. What Am I? Descartes’s various ways of considering the self. Journal of Modern Philosophy, 2020, vol. 2(1), pp. 2. DOI: http://doi.org/10.32881/jomp.30
  11. Tweyman S. Descartes’ meditations: New approaches – introduction. The European Legacy, 2022, vol. 27 (3–4), pp. 219–226, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2022.2035071
  12. Roth K., Formosa P. Kant on education and evil-perfecting human beings with an innate propensity to radical evil. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2019, vol. 51 (13), pp. 1304–1307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1520357
  13. Yunus B. Kant's view on education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 174, pp. 2713–2715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.956
  14. O’Raifeartaigh C. Historical and philosophical aspects of the Einstein world. History and Philosophy of Physics, 2019. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.08678  URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.08678
  15. Glevarec H. L’ ”espace social” selon P. Bourdieu: Les fondements d’une figuration de la société et d’une interprétation des pratiques culturelles. L'Année sociologique, 2021, vol. 71 (1), pp. 223–266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/anso.211.0223 URL: https://basepub.dauphine.psl.eu/handle/123456789/21957
  16. Witte D., Schmitz A. Relational sociology on a global scale: Field-theoretical perspectives on cross-cultural comparison and the re‐figuration of space(s). Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2021, vol. 22 (3), pp. 5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-22.3.3772
  17. Pascarella F., Vicigrado A., Tateo L. Spontaneous dramatization as dialogical space in the school context. Hu Arenas, 2022, vol. 5. pp. 407–423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-021-00184-4
  18. McMullen J., Verschaffel L., Hannula-Sormunen M. M. Spontaneous mathematical focusing tendencies in mathematical development. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2020, vol. 22 (4), pp. 249–257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1818466
  19. Rybak O. Value orientations of people leaning toward different types of culture. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 2018, vol. 9 (2), pp. 11–23. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs20182.11.23 URL: https://jecs.pl/index.php/jecs/article/view/392
  20. Dege C. L. “Standing behind your phrase”: Arendt and Jaspers on the (post-) metaphysics of evil. European Journal of Political Theory, 2021, vol. 22 (2). DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1177/14748851211052809
  21. Kleczkowska K. Bird communication in ancient Greek and roman thought. Maska, 2015, vol. 28, pp. 95–106. URL: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/84464113.pdf
  22. Smith M.E., Lobo J. Cities through the ages: One thing or many? Frontiers in Digital Humanities, 2019, vol. 6, pp. 12. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3389/fdigh.2019.00012
  23. Foster G. Circular economy strategies for adaptive reuse of cultural heritage buildings to reduce environmental impacts. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2020, vol. 152, pp. 104507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104507
  24. Koutsoyiannis D., Mamassis N. From mythology to science: The development of scientific hydrological concepts in Greek antiquity and its relevance to modern hydrology. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2021, vol. 25 (5), pp. 2419–2444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2419-2021
  25. Kintzinger M. Knowledge history of the middle ages: Discussions and perspective.  Frühmittelalterliche Studien, 2022, vol. 56 (1), pp. 375–394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/fmst-2022-0012
  26. Mukhamed T. V. Dynamics of philosophical concepts of education: From search of truth to game by simulacra. Bulletin of the Moscow State University of Culture and Arts, 2014, no. 5, pp. 156–160. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22499037 
  27. Allen, W. L. Bernard of Clairvaux’s sermons on the song of songs: Why they matter. Review & Expositor, 2008, vol. 105 (3), pp. 403–416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003463730810500305
  28. Winroth A. Gratian and his book: How a medieval teacher changed European law and religion. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 2021, vol. 10 (1), pp. 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwab003
  29. Heinrich H. Anglo-Saxon immigration and ethnogenesis. Medieval Archaeology, 2021, vol. 55 (1), pp. 1–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/174581711X13103897378311
  30. Bellitto M. C. Chivalry: A door to teaching the middle ages. The History Teacher, 1995, vol. 28 (4), pp. 479–485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/494635 URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/494635
  31. Özge B. O. Policy transfer and discursive de-europeanisation: Higher education from Bologna to Turkey. South European Society and Politics, 2016, vol. 21 (1), pp. 91–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2016.115201947
  32. Elfert M. Six decades of educational multilateralism in a globalising world: The history of the UNESCO institute in Hamburg. International Review of Education, 2013, vol. 59, pp. 263–287. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-013-9361-5
  33. Kumar P. Development of education in modern time. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR), 2018, vol. 5 (1), pp. 836–841. URL: https://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1801167.pdf
  34. Burton J. D., Baxter J. E. From the margins to the mainstream: Perspectives on nineteenth-century education. Childhood in the Past, 2018, vol. 11 (1), pp. 3–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17585716.2018.1447235
  35. González-Pérez L. I., Ramírez-Montoya M. S. Components of education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: Systematic review. Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14 (3), pp. 1493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493
Date of the publication 30.06.2023