Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 101–124
UDC: 
550.8.012+316.444+159.9.019.3

The study of the personification of the actor as a psychological phenomenon

Tretyakova V. S. 1 (Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation), Kaigorodova A. E. 1 (Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation), Sharov A. A. 1 (Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation), Zeer E. F. 1 (Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation)
1 Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article addresses the problem of ensuring the personification of the individual in the conditions of preparing for professional career. The aim of the study is to identify the main structural components of personification and to clarify their role in the transformation of the internal structure of the personality that determines the social and professional success of the actor (the subject of the activity).
Materials and Methods. The methodological basis of the study was V. A. Petrovsky’s conception of personalization and the conception of personification by A. B. Orlov, as well as the theory of psychological science, which considers a person as an active subject capable of self-determination and self-improvement. The main approaches to the scientific analysis were the subject-activity and system ones. The research methods included theoretical and methodological analysis of scholarly literature, the author's interpretation of the basic provisions of the concepts of personalization and personification, methods of design, modeling, specification and classification, generalization and prognostics.
Results. Based on the deep essence and psychological nature of personification, the authors identified three basic semantic components of this phenomenon and justified the content of each of them. It was established that the identified components of personification provide the formation of such new psychological formations as personality traits that determine full functioning of the personality and its professional and personal self-efficacy as a subject of activity. The interrelations between the components of personification and personality characteristics that ensure its full functioning were revealed. As a result of the research, a matrix of personification subject was constructed, which comprehensively reflects the integral abilities of the individual, ensuring social and professional success of the subject of activity.
Conclusions. Personification as an integral characteristic of individual psychological traits of a person ensures the stability of subjectivity, individuality and identity of personality – new psychological formations that make it possible to consider this phenomenon as an internal leading activity in enhancing social maturity by fulfilling personal potential and excessive social and professional activity of the subject. In the conditions of professional preparation in a new personalized format of education, where the main driving force is the personality of the student, it is important to form such properties that will ensure the professional and personal productivity of the actor. It is the personification of the individual that is the most important predictor of the socio-professional success of the actor in the conditions of preparation for professional activity. The study showed that the personification of personality is constructive and can serve as a psychological basis for a comprehensive study of the subject of activity, their self-development and self-fulfillment.

Keywords: 

Actor; Personalization; Personification; Structural components of personification; Characteristics of a personified subject; Social success; Professional success.

For citation:
Tretyakova V. S., Kaigorodova A. E., Sharov A. A., Zeer E. F. The study of the personification of the actor as a psychological phenomenon. Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 101–124. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2303.05
References: 
  1. Aksenova A. Yu., Primchuk N. V. Essential characteristics of personalization of learning: Environmental approach. Man and Education, 2020, no. 4, pp. 43–49. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.54884/S181570410020462-3 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44737029
  2. Esaulova M. B. Development of higher vocational-pedagogical education: Aspect of personalization. Man and Education, 2012, no. 4, pp. 25–29. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18766251
  3. Zeer E. F., Symanyuk E. E. Personification of personality as a predictor of overcoming the crisis of loss of professional activity at the age of late maturity. Siberian Journal of Psychology, 2022, no. 84, pp. 111–125. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/84/6 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49278793
  4. Karapetyan L. V. Social and psychological predictors of successfulness: A compartive study among representatives of professional groups. Organizational Psychology, 2019, vol. 9 (3), pp. 20–34. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42758832 
  5. Krasnova O. V. Retirement and women’s identity. Psychological Studies, 2014, vol. 7 (35), pp. 6. (In Russian) DOI: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21845782
  6. Kushtanina V. A. Retirement as a reconsideration of identity. Universe of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology, 2008, vol. 17 (4), pp. 152–163. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=11931479
  7. Morosanova V. I., Gaidamashko I. V., Kondratyuk N. G. Reliability of self-regulation as a resource for goal achievement in high-risk occupations. Moscow University Bulletin, 2020, no. 1, pp. 77–95. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.11621/vsp.2020.01.05 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42619924
  8. Stakhneva L. A. Understanding of the subject and subjectivity in modern psychology. Scientific Notes of the Orel State University, 2010, no. 1, pp. 345–349. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15257876
  9. Tarasenko V. V. Foreign experience of realization of the personied approach to development of management personnel of educational organization. Management, 2018, vol. 6 (3), pp. 55–59. (In Russian) DOI: http://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2018-3-55-59 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36290651
  10. Fedina N. V., Dormidontov R. A., Eliseev V. K. Main trends and priorities in Russian and international studies on cognitive and non-cognitive predictors of academic success. Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12 (6), pp. 7–31. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2206.01 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=50026295
  11. Etko E. A. Ideas of personalization and personification in Russian psychology: current status and research perspectives. Psychological Studies, 2015, vol. 8 (41), pp. 8. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/doi.org/10.54359/ps.v8i41.540 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25280665 
  12. Beier M. E., Torres W. J., Gilberto J. M. Activities matter: Personality and resource determinants of activities and their effect on mental and physical well-being and retirement expectation. Work, Aging and Retirement, 2018, vol. 4 (1). pp. 67–78. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/workar/waw034  URL: https://hrs.isr.umich.edu/publications/biblio/9436
  13. Borida P., Read S., Borida S. Retiring: Role identity processes in retirement transition. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2020, vol. 41 (5), pp. 445–460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2438
  14. DeLorenzo R. Game changer: Dramatic journey to digital personal competency system. Policy of Education, 2019, vol. 3, pp. 158–163. URL: http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Game%20changer%3A%20Dramatic%20journey%20to%20digital%20personal%20competency%20system&journal=Policy%20of%20Education&volume=3&issue=79&pages=158-163&publication_year=2019&author=Lorenzo%2CR
  15. Martin J. Self-regulated learning, social cognitive theory, and agency. Educational Psychologist, 2004, vol. 39 (2), pp. 135–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_4
  16. Rebughini P. Subject, subjectivity, subjectivation. Sociopedia.isa, 2014, pp. 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20568460022 URL: https://www.isaportal.org/resources/resource/subject-subjectivity-subjectivation/download/
  17. Reynolds K., Bazemore C., Hanebuth C., Hendren S., Horn M. The relationship of non-cognitive factors to academic and clinical performance in graduate rehabilitation science students in the United States: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 2021, vol. 18, p. 31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.31
  18. Richardson M., Abraham C., Bond R. Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 2012, vol. 138 (2), pp. 353–387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838
Date of the publication 30.06.2023