| 
User login
The impact of using the model of research supervising on the formation of research competence in students majoring in education
1 , Richter T. V.
1 
Introduction. The article investigates the problem of increasing the efficiency of educational process at university with the main focus on supervising students’ research. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the influence of using the model of research supervision on developing research competences of students majoring in education.
Materials and Methods. The study is conducted on the basis of theoretical analysis and generalization of scholarly literature on supervising students’ research, experimental methods of educational research, and methods of mathematical statistics for processing empirical data (Wilcoxon test).
Results. The authors identified the following components within the research supervision model: choosing the research topic, determining the research methodology; diagnostic materials for identifying the effectiveness of the research investigation (criteria, indicators, levels of results assessment, choosing diagnostic methods); participation in research conferences, seminars, forums, etc.; design of experimental research (formative experiment program, short-term academic placement program); working in the academic library, preparing references and literature reviews; writing research articles). The study has revealed a positive correlation between using the research supervision model and the increase in research competence of students majoring in education.
Conclusions. The authors conclude that the use of the model for research supervision improves students' research competence. The obtained results can be used to improve the efficiency of educational process at university.
Students' research work; Research competence; Educational practice; Practice program; Research organization model; Structural elements of the model; Efficiency of the educational process.
1. Alioon Y., Delialioğlu Ö. The effect of authentic m-learning activities on student engagement and motivation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2019, vol. 50 (2), pp. 655–668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12559
2. Bachtadze N., Kulba V., Zaikin O., Żylawski A. Mathematical model and method of analysis of the personal and group competence to complete the project task. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2019, vol. 52 (13), pp. 469–474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.105
3. Campbell A., Gallen A.-M., Jones M. H., Walshe A. The perceptions of STEM tutors on the role of tutorials in distance learning. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 2019, vol. 34 (1), pp. 89–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2018.1544488
4. Garabet M., Miron C. The development of the oral communicative ability at pupils during the physics lessons through the project method. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2010, vol. 2 (2), pp. 5130–5138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.834
5. López M. A. R. European higher education area-driven educational innovation. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2017, vol. 237, pp. 1505–1512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.237
6. Ruas K., Lima D. Digital technologies of information and communication in distance education: a new trend? Revista Educaonline, 2019, vol. 13 (1), pp. 99–121. URL: http://www.latec.ufrj.br/revistas/index.php?journal=educaonline&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=1032
7. Serkan D., Doğanay A. The effects of multiple-pedagogical agents on learners' academic success, motivation, and cognitive load. Computers & Education, 2017, vol. 111, pp. 74–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.005
8. Stupnisky R. H., BrckaLorenz A., Yuhas B., Guay F. Faculty members' motivation for teaching and best practices: Testing a model based on self-determination theory across institution types. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2018, vol. 53, pp. 15–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.01.004
9. Sutanto E. M. The influence of organizational learning capability and organizational creativity on organizational innovation of Universities in East Java, Indonesia. Asia Pacific Management Review, 2017, vol. 22 (3), pp. 128–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2016.11.002
10. Vlachopoulos D., Makri A. Online communication and interaction in distance higher education: A framework study of good practice. International Review of Education, 2019, vol. 65 (4), pp. 605–632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-019-09792-3
11. Walder A. M. Pedagogical Innovation in Canadian higher education: Professors' perspectives on its effects on teaching and learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2017, vol. 54, pp. 71–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.11.001
12. Weitze C. L. Designing pedagogical innovation for collaborating teacher teams. Journal of Education for Teaching, 2017, vol. 43 (3), pp. 361–373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2017.1319511
13. Yale A. T. The personal tutor-student relationship: student expectations and experiences of personal tutoring in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 2019, vol. 43 (4), pp. 533–544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1377164
14. Arefieva S. A., Arefieva O. V. Research work of students of a pedagogical university. Bulletin of the Mari State University, 2018, vol. 12 (4), pp. 9–13. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.30914/2072-6783-2018-12-4-9-13 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36588432
15. Vasiliev V. I., Sharypov A. V., Saveliev A. V., Rybin N. N. Organization of research activities of students in the conditions of development of digital technologies. Engineering Education, 2019, no. 26, pp. 66–74. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.35634/2412-9550-2020-30-3-283-288 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43962420
16. Golubeva I. A. Formation and development of students’ research activity in pedagogical universities in the 1950s. Bulletin of the Udmurt University. Philosophy Series. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2020, vol. 30 (3), pp. 283–288. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44013179
17. Gorbunova T. V. Continuity in organization of research activities of students. Modern Problems of Science and Education, 2021, no. 3, pp. 20. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17513/spno.30795 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46511458
18. Gordienko T. P., Bezusova T. A. Organization of the design group work with students under conditions of GEF 3 ++. Problems of Modern Pedagogical Education, 2019, no. 65–1, pp. 82–86. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42395591
19. Dykusova T. V. Formation of readiness for research activities in education of students of pedagogical university (specialization “history”). Scientific Notes of the Trans-Baikal State University, 2019, vol. 14 (4), pp. 59–67. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.21209/2658-7114-2019-14-4-59-67 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41222233
20. Zanfir L. N. Motivating students for research activities. Prospects for Science, 2020, no. 8, pp. 146–148. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44303565
21. Ziyazieva L. R., Elamanova A. B., Zhakenova A. T., Kaikenova A. A. Organization of scientific research work of students with the purpose of forming the readiness of university students for independent work. Modern School of Russia. Modernization Issues, 2021, no. 4–1, pp. 26–27. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46461772
22. Kachalova S. M. Organizational and pedagogical conditions for the development of research activities of university students. Ethnic Culture, 2020, no. 2 (3), pp. 107–110. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31483/r-74918 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43036859
23. Kindyashova A. S. Organization of research activities of pedagogical university students using elements of the coaching approach. Modern Problems of Science and Education, 2020, no. 2, pp. 36. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17513/spno.29664 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42918251
24. Pazukhina S. V. Psychological support for the development of joint research activities of students at the university. Human Factor: Social Psychologist, 2020, no. 2, pp. 118–123. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43997874
25. Pogrebnyak N. N. Actualization of the European experience of research activities in the higher education of Russia. Kazan Pedagogical Journal, 2020, no. 3, pp. 95–101. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43166520
26. Savchenko L. V. Scientific research activity of students as a background of the excellent self-development of the specialist. Problems of Modern Pedagogical Education, 2020, no. 66–1, pp. 186–189. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42813175
27. Skakovets I. S., Smirnov A. A., Zelenin L. A., Panachev V. D., Morozov A. P. To involve students in the development of creative and cultural competency activity in the research activities. Modern Science-Intensive Technologies, 2020, no. 9, pp. 215–219. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17513/snt.38244 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44027593
28. Chernetsov P. I., Nikolaeva I. S., Shadchin I. V. Psychological and pedagogical diagnostics of readiness students for scientific research activity. Innovative Development of Vocational Education, 2020, no. 2, pp. 122–130. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43059867
