Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 179–194
UDC: 
37.091

The problem of choosing universal tools for foreign language teaching in conditions of changing educational paradigms

Ermolova T. V. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation), Savitskaya N. V. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation), Dedova O. V. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation), Guzova A. V. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation)
1 Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article presents a retrospective analysis of tools for teaching foreign languages in the context of changing educational paradigms, as a reaction to the dominance of the new approach formulated as a result of the evolution of the digital model within foreign language instruction. The purpose of the article is to justify the choice of universal tools for teaching foreign languages, relevant to the modern educational paradigm, the main characteristic feature of which is responsible self-education (learner autonomy).
Materials and Methods. To achieve the aim of the study, the following research methods were used: general research methods including dialectical, analysis and synthesis of scholarly literature, comparisons and analogies, reviewing, summarizing information obtained from modern academic sources, and special research methods containing system and comparative analysis, etc. The study was carried out in line with the concept of informatization of education and followed communicative, competence, contextual, learner-centered and activity-based approaches to foreign language instruction.
Results. Firstly, the author substantiated the need for accepting the fact that in the conditions of mass industrialization, the educational ecosystem is transferring to a new educational paradigm, consequently, it is necessary to transform the very mechanism of organizing educational process, in particular, foreign language instruction. Secondly, a retrospective analysis of foreign language teaching tools in the context of changing educational paradigms has been conducted, as a reaction to the dominance of the new approach formulated as a result of the evolution of the digital resource model within foreign language instruction, namely SCALL-, MALL- and RALL-approaches. Thirdly, the author has put forward a hypothesis about a universal tool for teaching foreign languages, relevant to the modern educational digital competence paradigm.
Conclusions. The author argues that at the present stage, virtual (electronic) educational platforms can be adopted as universal tools for teaching foreign languages relevant to the modern educational paradigm, the main characteristic of which is responsible self-education (learner autonomy), the practice of using those is quite common for Russia, including conditions of autonomous education. In the medium term, mobile training tools can be considered as universal, however, it is necessary to systematize the practice of testing them in educational settings of various levels. In the long term, products ‘generated’ by RALL evolution, including learning tools with artificial intelligence, can be considered as universal tools for teaching foreign languages. Taking into account the fact, that such products as chat bots are just beginning to be used for educational purposes, it is assumed that they will become understandable, adaptive and, as a result, universal digital tools of foreign language instruction including autonomous learning only in the distant future.

Keywords: 

Digital resource approach; Autonomous learning; Foreign language instruction; Artificial intelligence systems; Educational platforms; Electronic learning environment; Artificial intelligence; Big data analysis; LMS Moodle.

URL WoS/RSCI: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:47447644

For citation:
Ermolova T. V., Savitskaya N. V., Dedova O. V., Guzova A. V. The problem of choosing universal tools for foreign language teaching in conditions of changing educational paradigms. Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 179–194. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2106.10
References: 
  1. Li H., Peng M. Y., Yang M., Chen C. C. Exploring the influence of learning motivation and socioeconomic status on college students' learning outcomes using self-determination theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 2020, vol. 11, pp. 849–861. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00849
  2. Uvarov V. I. Students' independent work as an important component of the process of developing listening skills in teaching a foreign language in a non-linguistic university. CHRONOS, 2021, vol.  6 (1), pp. 29–31. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44549200
  3. Borg S., Alshumaimeri Y. Language learner autonomy in a tertiary context: Teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Teaching Research, 2019, vol. 23 (1), pp. 9–38. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362168817725759
  4. Zhankina B. Zh., Kostina E. A., Zhetpisbayeva B.A., Kargin S.T. Basic factors of developing learner autonomy in foreign language education (with the main focus on Kazakhstan). Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9 (2), pp. 126–139. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1902.09 ULR: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38191469
  5. Putistina O. V. Teaching of foreign language discourse in the development concepts of educational autonomy of students. Izvestia Volgograd State Pedagogical University, 2021, no. 4, pp. 52–59. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46184653
  6. Kergroach S. Industry 4.0: new challenges and opportunities for the labor market. Foresight and STI Governance, 2017, vol. 11 (4), pp. 6–8. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2017.4.6.8   URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30776500
  7. Ignashina Z. N., Rybakova I. A. Increasing student motivation in teaching foreign languages: The practical aspect. Modern Pedagogical Education, 2021, no. 4, pp. 146–149. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45788583
  8. Pregowska A., Masztalerz K., Garlińska M., Osial M. A worldwide journey through distance education – from the post office to virtual, augmented and mixed realities, and education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 2021, vol. 11 (3), pp. 118. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI11030118
  9. Valverde-Berrocoso, J., Garrido-Arroyo Md. C., Burgos-Videla C., Morales-Cevallos M. B. Trends in educational research about e-learning: A systematic literature review (2009–2018). Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12 (12), pp. 51–53. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12125153
  10. Ostrovsky A. V., Kudina M. V. New educational paradigm in the era of state digital transformation. Public Administration. Electronic Bulletin, 2020, no. 78, pp. 299–244. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24411/2070-1381-2020-10041 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42471926
  11. Sánchez-Caballé A., Gisbert-Cervera M., Esteve-Mon F. Integrating digital competence in higher education curricula: An institutional analysis. Educar, 2021, vol. 57 (1), pp. 241–258. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.1174
  12. Maximova O. I. Computer assisted language learning. Bulletin of the Financial University, 2017, vol. 21 (2), pp. 154–157. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2017-21-2-154-157  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29274719
  13. Ghanizadeh A., Razavi A., Jahedizadeh S. Technology-enhanced language learning (TELL): A review of resourses and upshots. International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy, 2015, vol. 54, pp. 73–87. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18052/WWW.SCIPRESS.COM/ILCPA.54.73
  14. Golonka E. M., Bowles A. R., Frank V. M., Richardson D. L., Freynik S. Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2014, vol. 27 (1), pp. 70–105. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.700315
  15. Shadiev R., Yang M. Review of Studies on Technology-Enhanced Language Learning and Teaching. Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12 (2), pp. 524. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12020524
  16. Igumnova O. V. The possibilities of using LMS moodle for organizing extracurricular reading in the discipline “foreign language” at non-linguistic faculties of educational institutions of higher education. Theory and Practice of Sociohumanitary Sciences, 2021, no. 1, pp. 18–24. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46262431
  17. Khakhalina M. S., Shcherba O. Yu., Poryaz N. V. Some problems of using moodle platform when teaching ESL to university students of non-linguistic departments majoring in education science. Language Research and Modern Humanitarian Knowledge, 2021, vol. 3 (1), pp. 97–105. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33910/2686-830X-2021-3-1-97-105 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45704038
  18. Krylova E. A. Blended learning in higher education. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2020, no. 1, pp. 86–93. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23951/1609-624X-2020-1-86-93  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41722368
  19. Cramer F. What Is «Post-digital»? In: D. M. Berry, M. Dieter (Eds) Postdigital Aesthetics: Art, Computation and Design, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015, pp. 12–26. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137437204_2
  20. Belpaeme T., Kennedy J., Ramachandran A., Scassellati B., Tanaka F. Social robots for education: A review. Science Robotics, 2018, vol. 3 (21), pp. eaat5954. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aat5954
  21. Pavlyuk E. S. Stages of formation of cognitive independence. Modern Pedagogical Education, 2018, no. 5, pp. 31–37. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36782198
  22. Dokukina I., Gumanova J. The rise of chatbots – new personal assistants in foreign language learning. Procedia Computer Science, 2020, vol. 169, pp. 542–546. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.02.212
Date of the publication 31.12.2021